Performance of mobile networks with UAVs: Can flying base stations substitute ultra-dense small cells?

A crucial challenge for future mobile networks is to enable wide range of scenarios and use cases for different devices spanning from simple sensors to advanced machines or users devices. Such requirements call for highly flexible and scalable radio access network (RAN). To provide high flexibility and scalability in dynamic scenarios, flying base stations (FlyBSs), i.e., base stations mounted on general unmanned aerial vehicles, can be integrated into RAN. In this paper, implementation and operational issues related to the FlyBSs are discussed. Additionally scenarios where the FlyBS can be profitable are outlined. Furthermore, we define the architecture of a flying RAN (FlyRAN) encompassing the FlyBSs and enabling real-time control of whole RAN so that it can dynamically adapt to users' movement and changes in their communication activity. Our results show the superior efficiency of FlyBSs comparing to an ultra-dense deployment of static base stations (BSs) for a realistic scenario with moving users. Our simulations suggest that one FlyBS can provide throughput comparable to static BSs deployed with density corresponding to inter-site distance of 45 meters. At the same time, energy efficiency of the communication for the user equipment can be improved more than 5-times. This indicates that integration of the FlyBSs into mobile networks can be an efficient alternative to ultra-dense small cell deployment, especially in scenarios with users moving in crowds.

[1]  Sofie Pollin,et al.  LTE in the sky: trading off propagation benefits with interference costs for aerial nodes , 2016, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[2]  Troels B. Sorensen,et al.  An Empirical LTE Smartphone Power Model with a View to Energy Efficiency Evolution , 2014 .

[3]  Halim Yanikomeroglu,et al.  The New Frontier in RAN Heterogeneity: Multi-Tier Drone-Cells , 2016, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[4]  David Gesbert,et al.  Learning radio maps for UAV-aided wireless networks: A segmented regression approach , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[5]  Rui Zhang,et al.  Wireless communications with unmanned aerial vehicles: opportunities and challenges , 2016, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[6]  Cheng-Xiang Wang,et al.  5G Ultra-Dense Cellular Networks , 2015, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[7]  Karina Mabell Gomez,et al.  Designing and implementing future aerial communication networks , 2016, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[8]  Gabriel M. Rebeiz,et al.  Millimeter-wave large-scale phased-arrays for 5G systems , 2015, 2015 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium.

[9]  David Gesbert,et al.  Optimal positioning of flying relays for wireless networks: A LOS map approach , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[10]  Yuehong Gao,et al.  Performance Evaluation on Cell Clustering Interference Mitigation and CoMP in Multi-Pico Network with Dynamic TDD , 2015, 2015 IEEE 81st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[11]  Kandeepan Sithamparanathan,et al.  Optimal LAP Altitude for Maximum Coverage , 2014, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[12]  Walid Saad,et al.  Drone Small Cells in the Clouds: Design, Deployment and Performance Analysis , 2014, 2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[13]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Fronthaul-constrained cloud radio access networks: insights and challenges , 2015, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[14]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Broadband Millimeter-Wave Propagation Measurements and Models Using Adaptive-Beam Antennas for Outdoor Urban Cellular Communications , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[15]  Christian Wietfeld,et al.  Interference Aware Positioning of Aerial Relays for Cell Overload and Outage Compensation , 2012, 2012 IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall).

[16]  Fumiyuki Adachi,et al.  Radio Resource Allocation for Low-Medium-Altitude Aerial Platform Based TD-LTE Networks against Disaster , 2012, 2012 IEEE 75th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[17]  Halim Yanikomeroglu,et al.  Efficient 3-D placement of an aerial base station in next generation cellular networks , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[18]  Michael S. Berger,et al.  Cloud RAN for Mobile Networks—A Technology Overview , 2015, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[19]  Siyi Wang,et al.  Performance analysis of micro unmanned airborne communication relays for cellular networks , 2014, 2014 9th International Symposium on Communication Systems, Networks & Digital Sign (CSNDSP).

[20]  Luiz A. DaSilva,et al.  Deployment of UAV-mounted access points according to spatial user locations in two-tier cellular networks , 2016, 2016 Wireless Days (WD).

[21]  Lav Gupta,et al.  Survey of Important Issues in UAV Communication Networks , 2016, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[22]  Ioannis Karamouzas,et al.  Universal power law governing pedestrian interactions. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[23]  Xiang-Gen Xia,et al.  Enabling UAV cellular with millimeter-wave communication: potentials and approaches , 2016, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[24]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Radio propagation path loss models for 5G cellular networks in the 28 GHZ and 38 GHZ millimeter-wave bands , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[25]  Walid Saad,et al.  Optimal transport theory for power-efficient deployment of unmanned aerial vehicles , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).