An Approach to the Application of the Design Structure Matrix for Assessing Reconfigurability of Distributed Manufacturing Systems

In recent years, a large number of approaches to developing distributed manufacturing systems have been proposed. One of the principle reasons for these developments has been to enhance the reconfigurability of a manufacturing operation; allowing it to readily adapt to changes over time. However, to date, there has only been a limited assessment of the resulting reconfigurability properties and hence it remains inconclusive as to whether a distributed manufacturing system design approach does in fact improve reconfigurability. Recently, the "design structure matrix" has been proposed as a tool for assessing the modularity of elements in a distributed manufacturing system by Farid, A. and McFarlane, D. (2006). However, a clear and systematic approach to its application to distributed manufacturing systems has yet to be developed. This paper outlines such an approach in three phases: 1) definition of system boundary and functionality 2) identification of system components and finally 3) identification of interfaces between components. The use of the design structure matrix is illustrated in assessing a robot assembly cell designed on distributed manufacturing system principles

[1]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Integration analysis of product decompositions , 1994 .

[2]  M. Hashemian,et al.  An Integrated Modular Design Methodology for Life-Cycle Engineering , 1997 .

[3]  Sanjay E. Sarma,et al.  Auto ID systems and intelligent manufacturing control , 2003 .

[4]  D. V. Steward,et al.  The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[5]  John K. Gershenson,et al.  Product modularity: Definitions and benefits , 2003 .

[6]  John K. Gershenson,et al.  Product modularity: measures and design methods , 2004 .

[7]  John K. Gershenson,et al.  Modular Product Design: A Life-Cycle View , 1999, Trans. SDPS.

[8]  R. Nagel,et al.  Agile competitors and virtual organisations , 1995 .

[9]  Duncan McFarlane,et al.  A TOOL FOR ASSESSING RECONFIGURABILITY OF DISTRIBUTED MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS , 2006 .

[10]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  Modularity in design of products and systems , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[11]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Identifying Modular and Integrative Systems and Their Impact on Design Team Interactions , 2003 .

[12]  Duncan McFarlane,et al.  Developments in holonic production planning and control , 2000 .

[13]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Managing in an age of modularity. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[14]  Ralph Roberts Zone logic: A unique method of practical artificial intelligence , 1989 .

[15]  D. McFarlane,et al.  Holonic Manufacturing Control: Rationales, Developments and Open Issues , 2003 .

[16]  Nam P. Suh,et al.  Axiomatic Design: Advances and Applications , 2001 .