Psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire and the Cochin Hand Function Scale in patients with systemic sclerosis

Objectives: To translate the visual analogue scales (VAS) in the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SSc HAQ) and the Cochin Hand Function Scale (CHFS) and to examine the reliability and validity of the Swedish versions of the instruments. Method: The reproducibility, internal consistency, acceptability, and validity of the instruments were evaluated. Eighty-three consecutive patients participated in the evaluation of the SSc HAQ and 56 in the CHFS. Sixty-six per cent fulfilled the criteria for limited systemic sclerosis (lcSSc) and 29% for diffuse systemic sclerosis (dcSSc). The patients were assessed regarding disease parameters, hand involvement, and quality of life, the latter using the 36-item short form health survey (SF-36). Results: The reproducibility in the HAQ Disability Index (HAQ-DI), the VAS of pulmonary, digital ulcer, and overall disease severity, and in the CHFS was good (intra-class correlation coefficients, ICCs ≥ 0.75). The internal consistency was high in the HAQ-DI and the CHFS but lower in the VAS. The HAQ-DI showed higher correlations coefficients with physical-related scores in the SF-36 (rs = –0.600) than with mental-related dimensions (rs = –0.235). All VAS showed significant correlation with the item for general health (p < 0.05). The CHFS showed high correlation to hand-related items in the HAQ (rs = 0.858) and moderate correlation to the physical summary score in SF-36 (rs = –0.521). The instruments could not discriminate between lcSSc and dcSSc, although significant correlations between the CHFS and hand involvement (p < 0.05) indicate the ability of the CHFS to discriminate between mild and severe hand involvement. Conclusions: The Swedish version of the SSc HAQ and the CHFS meet the requirements of reproducibility and concurrent validity. More studies are needed to examine the capacity of these instruments to discriminate between disease severities.

[1]  L. Portney,et al.  Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice , 2015 .

[2]  B. Thombs,et al.  Frequency and impact of symptoms experienced by patients with systemic sclerosis: results from a Canadian National Survey. , 2011, Rheumatology.

[3]  K. Eberhardt,et al.  Hand deformities are important signs of disease severity in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. , 2009, Rheumatology.

[4]  P. Boracchi,et al.  Reliability and validity of the Italian version of the hand functional disability scale in patients with systemic sclerosis , 2008, Clinical Rheumatology.

[5]  M. Revel,et al.  Assessing disability and quality of life in systemic sclerosis: construct validities of the Cochin Hand Function Scale, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Systemic Sclerosis HAQ, and Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey. , 2007, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[6]  O. Chassany,et al.  Validation of French version of the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SSc HAQ) , 2005, Clinical Rheumatology.

[7]  J. Poole,et al.  Reliability and validity of the Duruoz Hand Index in persons with systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). , 2004, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[8]  U. Nordenskiöld,et al.  Daily activities and hand function in women with scleroderma , 2004, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology.

[9]  A. Herrick,et al.  Systemic sclerosis: patients' perceptions of their condition. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[10]  T. Medsger,et al.  Criteria for the classification of early systemic sclerosis. , 2001, The Journal of rheumatology.

[11]  M. Eklund,et al.  Hand Mobility in Scleroderma (HAMIS) test: the reliability of a novel hand function test. , 2000, Arthritis care and research : the official journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association.

[12]  M. Eklund,et al.  Validity of HAMIS: a test of hand mobility in scleroderma. , 2000, Arthritis care and research : the official journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association.

[13]  T. Medsger,et al.  Severe organ involvement in systemic sclerosis with diffuse scleroderma. , 2000, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[14]  J. Poole,et al.  Reliability and validity of the Arthritis Hand Function Test in adults with systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). , 2000, Arthritis care and research : the official journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association.

[15]  P. Tugwell,et al.  The OMERACT filter for Outcome Measures in Rheumatology. , 1998, The Journal of rheumatology.

[16]  T. Medsger,et al.  The value of the Health Assessment Questionnaire and special patient-generated scales to demonstrate change in systemic sclerosis patients over time. , 1997, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[17]  D. Altman,et al.  Statistics notes: Cronbach's alpha , 1997 .

[18]  J Fermanian,et al.  Development and validation of a rheumatoid hand functional disability scale that assesses functional handicap. , 1996, The Journal of rheumatology.

[19]  J. Ware,et al.  The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey--I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. , 1995, Social science & medicine.

[20]  Clements Pj Measuring disease activity and severity in scleroderma. , 1995, Current opinion in rheumatology.

[21]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .

[22]  Catherine L. Backman,et al.  Arthritis Hand Function Test: Development of a Standardized Assessment Tool , 1991 .

[23]  J. Poole,et al.  The use of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) to determine physical disability in systemic sclerosis. , 1991, Arthritis care and research : the official journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association.

[24]  A. Masi Preliminary criteria for the classification of systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). , 1980, Bulletin on the rheumatic diseases.

[25]  Leslie G. Portney Dpt PhD Fapta,et al.  Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice , 2015 .

[26]  G. Grimby,et al.  Grip force in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and fibromyalgia and in healthy subjects. A study with the Grippit instrument. , 1993, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology.

[27]  Ware J.E.Jr.,et al.  THE MOS 36- ITEM SHORT FORM HEALTH SURVEY (SF- 36) CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK AND ITEM SELECTION , 1992 .

[28]  C. Ekdahl,et al.  Assessing disability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Use of a Swedish version of the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire. , 1988, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology.

[29]  B. Munro Statistical methods for health care research , 1986 .

[30]  H. Holman,et al.  Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. , 1980, Arthritis and rheumatism.