Research Report: Better Theory Through Measurement-Developing a Scale to Capture Consensus on Appropriation

Proper measurement is critical to the advancement of theory (Blalock 1979). Adaptive Structuration Theory (AST) is rapidly becoming an important theoretical paradigm for comprehending the impacts of advanced information technologies (DeSanctis and Poole 1994). Intended as a complement to the faithfulness of appropriation scale developed by Chin et al. (1997), this research note describes the development of an instrument to capture the AST construct of consensus on appropriation. Consensus on appropriation (COA) is the extent to which group participants perceive that they have agreed on how to adopt and use a technology. While consensus on appropriation is an important component of AST, no scale is currently available to capture this construct. This research note develops a COA instrument in the context of electronic meeting systems use. Initial item development, statistical analyses, and validity assessment (convergent, discriminant, and nomological) are described here in detail. The contribution of this effort is twofold: First, a scale is provided for an important construct from AST. Second, this report serves as an example of rigorous scale development using structural equation modeling. Employing rigorous procedures in the development of instruments to capture AST constructs is critical if the sound theoretical base provided by AST is to be fully exploited in understanding phenomena related to the use of advanced information technologies.

[1]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Transforming a Lean CMC Medium into a Rich One: An Empirical Investigation in Small Groups , 1996, ICIS.

[2]  Suprateek Sarker,et al.  Using a case study to test the role of three key social enablers in ERP implementation , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[3]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Facilitation, GSS, and Training as Sources of Process Restrictiveness and Guidance for Structured Group Decision Making: An Empirical Assessment , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  Marshall Scott,et al.  Microlevel Structuration in Computer-Supported Group Decision Making , 1992 .

[5]  R. Kanter.  Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  P. Bentler.  Comparative Fit Indices in Structural Models , 1990 .

[7]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  The Effects of Group Attitudes Toward Alternative GDSS Designs on the Decision‐making Performance of Computer‐Supported Groups* , 1994 .

[8]  L. Tucker,et al.  A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis , 1973 .

[9]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  The Effects of Variations in Capabilities of GDSS Designs on Management of Cognitive Conflict in Groups , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Advancing the Theory of Adaptive Structuration: The Development of a Scale to Measure Faithfulness of Appropriation , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Adoption intention in GSS: relative importance of beliefs , 1995, DATB.

[13]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  S. Green,et al.  The effects of three social decision schemes on decision group process , 1980 .

[15]  S LeeAllen.  Electronic mail as a medium for rich communication , 1994 .

[16]  P. Bentler,et al.  Evaluating model fit. , 1995 .

[17]  Mark S. Silver,et al.  Decision Support Systems: Directed and Nondirected Change , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  Brian E. Mennecke,et al.  Restrictive Group Support Systems as a Source of Process Structure for High and Low Procedural Order Groups , 1993 .

[19]  P. Berger,et al.  Social Construction of Reality , 1991, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society.

[20]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[21]  H. Blalock.  The Presidential Address: Measurement and Conceptualization Problems: The Major Obstacle to Integrating Theory and Research , 1979 .

[22]  Weidong Chen,et al.  Declarative updates of relational databases , 1995, TODS.

[23]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Channel Expansion Theory and the Experiential Nature of Media Richness Perceptions , 1999 .

[24]  K. Jöreskog,et al.  Intraclass Reliability Estimates: Testing Structural Assumptions , 1974 .

[25]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[26]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[27]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness of fit. , 1990 .

[28]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Information Technology to Support Electronic Meetings , 1988, MIS Q..

[29]  K. Bollen.  Sample size and bentler and Bonett's nonnormed fit index , 1986 .

[30]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[31]  Allen S. Lee.  Electronic Mail as a Medium for Rich Communication: An Empirical Investigation Using Hermeneutic Interpretation , 1994, MIS Q..

[32]  C. Steinfield,et al.  A Social Influence Model of Technology use , 1990 .

[33]  S. Asch.  Effects of Group Pressure Upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgments , 1951 .

[34]  M. Markus,et al.  The Magic Bullet Theory in IT-Enabled Transformation , 1997 .