Using diel movement behavior to infer foraging strategies related to ecological and social factors in elephants

BackgroundAdaptive movement behaviors allow individuals to respond to fluctuations in resource quality and distribution in order to maintain fitness. Classically, studies of the interaction between ecological conditions and movement behavior have focused on such metrics as travel distance, velocity, home range size or patch occupancy time as the salient metrics of behavior. Driven by the emergence of very regular high frequency data, more recently the importance of interpreting the autocorrelation structure of movement as a behavioral metric has become apparent. Studying movement of a free ranging African savannah elephant population, we evaluated how two movement metrics, diel displacement (DD) and movement predictability (MP - the degree of autocorrelated movement activity at diel time scales), changed in response to variation in resource availability as measured by the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index. We were able to capitalize on long term (multi-year) yet high resolution (hourly) global positioning system tracking datasets, the sample size of which allows robust analysis of complex models. We use optimal foraging theory predictions as a framework to interpret our results, in particular contrasting the behaviors across changes in social rank and resource availability to infer which movement behaviors at diel time scales may be optimal in this highly social species.ResultsBoth DD and MP increased with increasing forage availability, irrespective of rank, reflecting increased energy expenditure and movement predictability during time periods of overall high resource availability. However, significant interactions between forage availability and social rank indicated a stronger response in DD, and a weaker response in MP, with increasing social status.ConclusionsRelative to high ranking individuals, low ranking individuals expended more energy and exhibited less behavioral movement autocorrelation during lower forage availability conditions, likely reflecting sub-optimal movement behavior. Beyond situations of contest competition, rank status appears to influence the extent to which individuals can modify their movement strategies across periods with differing forage availability. Large-scale spatiotemporal resource complexity not only impacts fine scale movement and optimal foraging strategies directly, but likely impacts rates of inter- and intra-specific interactions and competition resulting in socially based movement responses to ecological dynamics.

[1]  John F. Wilmshurst,et al.  PREDICTIVE MODELS OF MOVEMENT BY SERENGETI GRAZERS , 2004 .

[2]  Brian D. Ripley,et al.  Modern applied statistics with S, 4th Edition , 2002, Statistics and computing.

[3]  William F. Fagan,et al.  Search and navigation in dynamic environments – from individual behaviors to population distributions , 2008 .

[4]  Gordon B. Stenhouse,et al.  Temporal autocorrelation functions for movement rates from global positioning system radiotelemetry data , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  G. Pyke.  Optimal Foraging Theory: A Critical Review , 1984 .

[6]  W. Getz,et al.  Hierarchical dominance structure and social organization in African elephants, Loxodonta africana , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  Walter Krämer,et al.  Review of Modern applied statistics with S, 4th ed. by W.N. Venables and B.D. Ripley. Springer-Verlag 2002 , 2003 .

[8]  C. Hawkes,et al.  Linking movement behaviour, dispersal and population processes: is individual variation a key? , 2009, The Journal of animal ecology.

[9]  Vito M. R. Muggeo,et al.  Animal Perception of Seasonal Thresholds: Changes in Elephant Movement in Relation to Rainfall Patterns , 2012, PloS one.

[10]  E. Charnov.  Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.

[11]  F. D. de Waal,et al.  Types of dominance in a chimpanzee colony. , 1980, Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology.

[12]  W. Lampert.  The adaptive significance of die 1 vertical migration of zooplankton , 2008 .

[13]  R. Wrangham.  An Ecological Model of Female-Bonded Primate Groups , 1980 .

[14]  Samuel A. Cushman,et al.  Elephants in space and time , 2005 .

[15]  Leo Polansky,et al.  From moonlight to movement and synchronized randomness: Fourier and wavelet analyses of animal location time series data. , 2010, Ecology.

[16]  W. Getz,et al.  The socioecology of elephants: analysis of the processes creating multitiered social structures , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  J Kurths,et al.  Nonstationary Gaussian processes in wavelet domain: synthesis, estimation, and significance testing. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  I. Norscia,et al.  Influence of Dry Season and Food Quality and Quantity on Behavior and Feeding Strategy of Propithecus verreauxi in Kirindy, Madagascar , 2006, International Journal of Primatology.

[19]  Leo Polansky,et al.  A framework for understanding the architecture of collective movements using pairwise analyses of animal movement data , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[20]  Leo Polansky,et al.  Disentangling the effects of forage, social rank, and risk on movement autocorrelation of elephants using Fourier and wavelet analyses , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  J. B. Calhoun.  Diel Activity Rhythms of the Rodents, Microtus Ochrogaster and Sigmodon Hispidus Hispidus , 1945 .

[22]  G. Wittemyer,et al.  The impact of ecological variability on the reproductive endocrinology of wild female African elephants , 2007, Hormones and Behavior.

[23]  F. Vollrath,et al.  Social dominance, seasonal movements, and spatial segregation in African elephants: a contribution to conservation behavior , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[24]  C. Thouless.  Feeding competition between grazing red deer hinds , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  W. Getz,et al.  A likely ranking interpolation for resolving dominance orders in systems with unknown relationships , 2006 .

[26]  Douglas Maraun,et al.  Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics , 2000 .

[27]  H. Landau.  On dominance relations and the structure of animal societies: I. Effect of inherent characteristics , 1951 .

[28]  E. Revilla,et al.  A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  E. Laca,et al.  Mechanisms that result in large herbivore grazing distribution patterns. , 1996 .

[30]  G. Closs,et al.  Diel activity and home range size in relation to food supply in a drift-feeding stream fish , 2005 .

[31]  Wayne M Getz,et al.  Inferring ecological and behavioral drivers of African elephant movement using a linear filtering approach. , 2011, Ecology.

[32]  R. Byrne,et al.  Elephant cognition in primate perspective , 2009 .

[33]  George Wittemyer,et al.  Predicting time-specific changes in demographic processes using remote-sensing data , 2006 .

[34]  Robert D. Holt,et al.  Landscape scale, heterogeneity, and the viability of Serengeti grazers , 2005 .

[35]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[36]  George Wittemyer,et al.  Comparative Demography of an At-Risk African Elephant Population , 2013, PloS one.

[37]  Mollie E. Brooks,et al.  Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[38]  J. M. Fryxell,et al.  Foraging theory upscaled: the behavioural ecology of herbivore movement , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  Christina Gloeckner,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics With S , 2003 .

[40]  D. Brillinger,et al.  An exploratory data analysis (EDA) of the paths of moving animals , 2004 .

[41]  W. Lampert.  The adaptive significance of diel vertical migrations , 1989 .

[42]  C. Torrence,et al.  A Practical Guide to Wavelet Analysis. , 1998 .

[43]  Nils Bunnefeld,et al.  Understanding scales of movement: animals ride waves and ripples of environmental change. , 2013, The Journal of animal ecology.

[44]  Jonathon D Crystal,et al.  Metacognition in animals. , 2009, Comparative cognition & behavior reviews.