Production of hyperpolarized [1,4-13C2]malate from [1,4-13C2]fumarate is a marker of cell necrosis and treatment response in tumors

Dynamic nuclear polarization of 13C-labeled cell substrates has been shown to massively increase their sensitivity to detection in NMR experiments. The sensitivity gain is sufficiently large that if these polarized molecules are injected intravenously, their spatial distribution and subsequent conversion into other cell metabolites can be imaged. We have used this method to image the conversion of fumarate to malate in a murine lymphoma tumor in vivo after i.v. injection of hyperpolarized [1,4-13C2]fumarate. In isolated lymphoma cells, the rate of labeled malate production was unaffected by coadministration of succinate, which competes with fumarate for transport into the cell. There was, however, a correlation with the percentage of cells that had lost plasma membrane integrity, suggesting that the production of labeled malate from fumarate is a sensitive marker of cellular necrosis. Twenty-four hours after treating implanted lymphoma tumors with etoposide, at which point there were significant levels of tumor cell necrosis, there was a 2.4-fold increase in hyperpolarized [1,4-13C2]malate production compared with the untreated tumors. Therefore, the formation of hyperpolarized 13C-labeled malate from [1,4-13C2]fumarate appears to be a sensitive marker of tumor cell death in vivo and could be used to detect the early response of tumors to treatment. Given that fumarate is an endogenous molecule, this technique has the potential to be used clinically.

[1]  M. Okada,et al.  [New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours-revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)]. , 2009, Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy.

[2]  Ferdia A Gallagher,et al.  A comparison between radiolabeled fluorodeoxyglucose uptake and hyperpolarized (13)C-labeled pyruvate utilization as methods for detecting tumor response to treatment. , 2009, Neoplasia.

[3]  R. Gold,et al.  Fumaric Acid and its Esters: An Emerging Treatment for Multiple Sclerosis , 2009, Current neuropharmacology.

[4]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[5]  F. Gleeson,et al.  The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of oesophageal carcinoma. , 2008, Clinical radiology.

[6]  J. Medema,et al.  Apoptosis and non-apoptotic deaths in cancer development and treatment response. , 2008, Cancer treatment reviews.

[7]  Albert P. Chen,et al.  Hyperpolarized 13C lactate, pyruvate, and alanine: noninvasive biomarkers for prostate cancer detection and grading. , 2008, Cancer research.

[8]  F. Gallagher,et al.  13C MR spectroscopy measurements of glutaminase activity in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells using hyperpolarized 13C‐labeled glutamine , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  Pernille R. Jensen,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of pH in vivo using hyperpolarized 13C-labelled bicarbonate , 2008, Nature.

[10]  M. Verheij Clinical biomarkers and imaging for radiotherapy-induced cell death , 2008, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[11]  Peter Magnusson,et al.  Cardiac metabolism measured noninvasively by hyperpolarized 13C MRI , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  H. Schöder,et al.  PET imaging for response assessment in lymphoma: potential and limitations. , 2008, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[13]  Kevin Brindle,et al.  New approaches for imaging tumour responses to treatment , 2008, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[14]  Sanjiv S Gambhir,et al.  Molecular imaging techniques in body imaging. , 2007, Radiology.

[15]  Jan Wolber,et al.  Detecting tumor response to treatment using hyperpolarized 13C magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy , 2007, Nature Medicine.

[16]  S. Linder,et al.  Cytokeratin-18 Is a Useful Serum Biomarker for Early Determination of Response of Breast Carcinomas to Chemotherapy , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[17]  D. Collins,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  Jan Henrik Ardenkjaer-Larsen,et al.  Metabolic imaging by hyperpolarized 13C magnetic resonance imaging for in vivo tumor diagnosis. , 2006, Cancer research.

[19]  Xiangao Sun,et al.  Selective Induction of Necrotic Cell Death in Cancer Cells by β-Lapachone through Activation of DNA Damage Response Pathway , 2006, Cell cycle.

[20]  A. Tardivon,et al.  Monitoring therapeutic efficacy in breast carcinomas , 2006, European Radiology.

[21]  Jonathan E. Schmitz,et al.  1H MRS‐visible lipids accumulate during apoptosis of lymphoma cells in vitro and in vivo , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  Seeing into cells , 2005 .

[23]  E. Wright,et al.  Specificity of the transport system for tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates in renal brush borders , 1980, The Journal of Membrane Biology.

[24]  Khusru Asadullah,et al.  Dimethylfumarate for psoriasis: more than a dietary curiosity. , 2005, Trends in molecular medicine.

[25]  Seeing into cells. The promise of in vivo molecular imaging in oncology. , 2005, EMBO reports.

[26]  J. Ardenkjær-Larsen,et al.  Increase in signal-to-noise ratio of > 10,000 times in liquid-state NMR , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  D. Valenti,et al.  The role of mitochondrial transport in energy metabolism. , 2003, Mitochondrion.

[28]  M. Frydenberg,et al.  Investigations with FDG-PET Scanning in Prostate Cancer Show Limited Value for Clinical Practice , 2002, Acta oncologica.

[29]  Ming Zhao,et al.  Non-invasive detection of apoptosis using magnetic resonance imaging and a targeted contrast agent , 2001, Nature Medicine.

[30]  Marcel Leist,et al.  Four deaths and a funeral: from caspases to alternative mechanisms , 2001, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[31]  V. Ganapathy,et al.  Primary Structure and Functional Characteristics of a Mammalian Sodium-coupled High Affinity Dicarboxylate Transporter* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[32]  R. Davis,et al.  In vivo detection and imaging of phosphatidylserine expression during programmed cell death. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  N. Chirgadze,et al.  Purification, characterization and preliminary X-ray study of fumarase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1992, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[34]  S. Wolffram,et al.  Characterization of the transport of tri- and dicarboxylates by pig intestinal brush-border membrane vesicles. , 1992, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Comparative physiology.

[35]  G K Radda,et al.  The use of NMR spectroscopy for the understanding of disease. , 1986, Science.

[36]  D. Donnelly,et al.  The subcellular distribution of fumarase isozymes in rat liver. , 1985, The International journal of biochemistry.

[37]  K. Hiraga,et al.  Intracellular distribution of fumarase in various animals. , 1984, Journal of biochemistry.

[38]  E. Wright,et al.  Interactions between lithium and renal transport of Krebs cycle intermediates. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  E. Wright,et al.  Stoichiometry of Na+-succinate cotransport in renal brush-border membranes. , 1982, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[40]  E. Wright,et al.  Transport of tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates by membrane vesicles from renal brush border. , 1979, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  H. Bergmeyer Methods of Enzymatic Analysis , 2019 .