Robust optimization of system compliance for physical interaction in uncertain scenarios

Compliance in robot design and control is often introduced to improve the robot performance in tasks where interaction with environment or human is required. However a rigorous method to choose the correct level of compliance is still not available. In this work we use robust optimization as a tool to select the optimal compliance value in a robotenvironment interaction scenario under uncertainties. We propose an approach that can be profitably applied on a variety of tasks, e.g.manipulation tasks or locomotion tasks. The aim is to minimize the forces of interaction considering model constraints and uncertainties. Numerical results show that: i) in case of perfect knowledge of the environment stiff robots behave better in terms of force minimization, ii) in case of uncertainties the optimal stiffness of the robot is lower than the previous case and optimal solutions provide a faster task accomplishment, iii) the optimal stiffness decreases as a function of the uncertainty measure. Experiments are carried out in a realistic set-up in case of bi-manual object handover.

[1]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Fast and "soft-arm" tactics [robot arm design] , 2004, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[2]  Matthew M. Williamson,et al.  Series elastic actuators , 1995, Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots.

[3]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  VSA-CubeBot: A modular variable stiffness platform for multiple degrees of freedom robots , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[4]  Sadao Kawamura,et al.  Resonance-based motion control method for multi-joint robot through combining stiffness adaptation and iterative learning control , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[5]  Xu Andy Sun,et al.  Adaptive Robust Optimization With Dynamic Uncertainty Sets for Multi-Period Economic Dispatch Under Significant Wind , 2015 .

[6]  Norbert Krüger,et al.  Robust optimization of robotic pick and place operations for deformable objects through simulation , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[7]  Stefano Stramigioli,et al.  Performance Comparison of a Planar Bipedal Robot with Rigid and Compliant Legs , 2011 .

[8]  Kris K. Hauser,et al.  Robust Trajectory Optimization Under Frictional Contact with Iterative Learning , 2015, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[9]  Elizabeth A. Croft,et al.  A human-inspired object handover controller , 2013, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[10]  Qi Zhang,et al.  An adjustable robust optimization approach to scheduling of continuous industrial processes providing interruptible load , 2016, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[11]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Soft-actuators in cyclic motion: Analytical optimization of stiffness and pre-load , 2013, 2013 13th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids).

[12]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Optimality principles in variable stiffness control: The VSA hammer , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[13]  Jörn Malzahn,et al.  A modular compliant actuator for emerging high performance and fall-resilient humanoids , 2015, 2015 IEEE-RAS 15th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids).

[14]  G. Oriolo,et al.  Robotics: Modelling, Planning and Control , 2008 .

[15]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  Adaptive synergies for the design and control of the Pisa/IIT SoftHand , 2014, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[16]  Alin Albu-Schaffer,et al.  Optimal Control for Maximizing Link Velocity of Robotic Variable Stiffness Joints , 2011 .

[17]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Soft robotics: what Cartesian stiffness can obtain with passively compliant, uncoupled joints? , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[18]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation , 1984, 1984 American Control Conference.

[19]  Constantine Caramanis,et al.  Theory and Applications of Robust Optimization , 2010, SIAM Rev..

[20]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Dealing with the Safety-Performance Tradeoff in Robot Arms Design and Control , 2004 .

[21]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  Variable impedance actuators: A review , 2013, Robotics Auton. Syst..