Pattern classification of terrain during amputee walking

In this thesis I study the role of extrinsic versus intrinsic sensing and determine a robust set of sensors from physical and reliability constraints for a terrain adaptation in a robotic ankle prosthesis. Further, during this thesis I collect a novel data-set that contains seven able-bodied participants walking over 19 terrain transitions and 7 non-amputees walking over 9 transitions, forming the largest collection of transitions to date using an exhaustive set of sensors: inertial measurement units, gyroscopes, kinematics from motion capture, and electromyography from 16 sites on the lower limbs for non-amputee subjects and 9 sites or amputee subjects. This work extends previous work [3] by using more conditions, a larger subject group, and more sensors on amputees, and includes non-amputees. I present a novel machine learning algorithm that uses sensor data during rapid transitions from pre-foothold to just prior to post-foothold to predict different terrain boundaries. This advances the field of biomechatronics, our understanding of terrain adaptation in people both with and without amputations, contributes to the development of a fully terrain adaptive robotic ankle prosthesis, and improves the quality of life for the physically challenged. Specifically we set out to prove between pre and post-foothold the ankle and knee positions calculated using an IMU attached to an amputees powered prosthetic ankle can discriminate with greater than 99% accuracy between 9 conditions. Our results suggest that myography as a non-volitional sensing modality for terrain adaptive protheses was not needed. Thesis Supervisor: Hugh Herr Title: Associate Professor of Media Arts and Sciences, Program in Media Arts and Sciences

[1]  N. Hogan,et al.  Probability density of the surface electromyogram and its relation to amplitude detectors , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  He Huang,et al.  A Strategy for Identifying Locomotion Modes Using Surface Electromyography , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Raghavaiah Kanakamedala,et al.  Anatomic Guide for the Electromyographer: The Limbs , 1982 .

[4]  Scott E Crouter,et al.  Accuracy and reliability of 10 pedometers for measuring steps over a 400-m walk. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[5]  Pascal Fua,et al.  Estimation and visualization of sagittal kinematics of lower limbs orientation using body-fixed sensors , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Chao Sima,et al.  Performance of Feature Selection Methods , 2009, Current genomics.

[7]  G Van der Perre,et al.  Development of EMG-based mode and intent recognition algorithms for a computer-controlled above-knee prosthesis. , 1990, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[8]  G E Loeb,et al.  BION system for distributed neural prosthetic interfaces. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.

[9]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Design and Control of a Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis , 2008, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[10]  Woodie Claude Flowers A man-interactive simulator system for above-knee prosthetics studies. , 1973 .

[11]  Kamiar Aminian,et al.  Spatio-temporal parameters of gait measured by an ambulatory system using miniature gyroscopes. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  Huosheng Hu,et al.  Myoelectric control systems - A survey , 2007, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[13]  Hugh M. Herr,et al.  Powered ankle-foot prosthesis to assist level-ground and stair-descent gaits , 2008, Neural Networks.

[14]  Guanglin Li,et al.  Performance of various EMG features in identifying ARM movements for control of multifunctional prostheses , 2009, 2009 IEEE Youth Conference on Information, Computing and Telecommunication.

[15]  Pedro M. Domingos,et al.  On the Optimality of the Simple Bayesian Classifier under Zero-One Loss , 1997, Machine Learning.

[16]  R N Scott Myoelectric control of prostheses. , 1966, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  Kevin B. Englehart,et al.  A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  Eduardo Rocon de Lima,et al.  Design and implementation of an inertial measurement unit for control of artificial limbs: Application on leg orthoses , 2006 .

[19]  T W Williams,et al.  Practical methods for controlling powered upper-extremity prostheses. , 1990, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[20]  S. Miyazaki,et al.  Long-term unrestrained measurement of stride length and walking velocity utilizing a piezoelectric gyroscope , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Jichuan Zhang,et al.  Terrain Identification for Prosthetic Knees Based on Electromyographic Signal Features , 2006 .

[22]  K.B. Englehart,et al.  Multiple Binary Classifications via Linear Discriminant Analysis for Improved Controllability of a Powered Prosthesis , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[23]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  A pneumatically powered knee-ankle-foot orthosis (KAFO) with myoelectric activation and inhibition , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[24]  R.N. Scott,et al.  A new strategy for multifunction myoelectric control , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  James Llinas,et al.  An introduction to multisensor data fusion , 1997, Proc. IEEE.