An $H_{\infty} $ LPV Design for Sampling Varying Controllers: Experimentation With a T-Inverted Pendulum

This brief deals with the adaptation of a real-time controller's sampling period to account for the available computing resource variations. The design of such controllers requires a parameter-dependent discrete-time model of the plant, where the parameter is the sampling period. A polytopic approach for linear parameter varying (LPV) systems is then developed to get an H∞ sampling period dependent controller. A reduction of the polytope size is here performed which drastically reduces the conservatism of the approach and makes easier the controller implementation. Some experimental results on a T-inverted pendulum are provided to show the efficiency of the approach.

[1]  Astrom Computer Controlled Systems , 1990 .

[2]  A. Packard Gain scheduling via linear fractional transformations , 1994 .

[3]  Anton Cervin,et al.  Feedback scheduling of control tasks , 2000, Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.00CH37187).

[4]  Carlos Canudas de Wit,et al.  Friction Models and Friction Compensation , 1998, Eur. J. Control.

[5]  Olivier Sename,et al.  A reduced polytopic LPV synthesis for a sampling varying controller: Experimentation with a T inverted pendulum , 2007, 2007 European Control Conference (ECC).

[6]  Karl-Erik Årzén,et al.  Feedback–Feedforward Scheduling of Control Tasks , 2002, Real-Time Systems.

[7]  Kan Tan,et al.  Output-feedback control of LPV sampled-data systems , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 American Control Conference. ACC (IEEE Cat. No.00CH36334).

[8]  O. R. Natale,et al.  Inverted pendulum stabilization through the Ethernet network, performance analysis , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference.

[9]  Karl Johan Åström,et al.  Computer-controlled systems (3rd ed.) , 1997 .

[10]  Olivier Sename,et al.  Robust control/scheduling co-design: application to robot control , 2005, 11th IEEE Real Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium.

[11]  Olivier Sename,et al.  SAMPLING PERIOD DEPENDENT RST CONTROLLER USED IN CONTROL/SCHEDULING CO-DESIGN , 2005 .

[12]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[13]  J. Geromel,et al.  Extended H 2 and H norm characterizations and controller parametrizations for discrete-time systems , 2002 .

[14]  Karl-Erik Årzén,et al.  A FEEDBACK SCHEDULER FOR REAL-TIME CONTROLLER TASKS , 2000 .

[15]  P. Apkarian,et al.  Advanced gain-scheduling techniques for uncertain systems , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 American Control Conference (Cat. No.97CH36041).

[16]  Antonio Sala,et al.  Computer control under time-varying sampling period: An LMI gridding approach , 2005, Autom..

[17]  Olivier Sename,et al.  Synthesis of a sampling period dependent controller using LPV approach , 2006 .

[18]  Pierre Apkarian,et al.  Self-scheduled H∞ control of linear parameter-varying systems: a design example , 1995, Autom..