A data-driven approach to prostate cancer detection from dynamic contrast enhanced MRI

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), particularly dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) imaging, has shown great potential in prostate cancer diagnosis and staging. In the current practice of DCE-MRI, diagnosis is based on quantitative parameters extracted from the series of T1-weighted images acquired after the injection of a contrast agent. To calculate these parameters, a pharmacokinetic model is fitted to the T1-weighted intensities. Most models make simplistic assumptions about the perfusion process. Moreover, these models require accurate estimation of the arterial input function, which is challenging. In this work we propose a data-driven approach to characterization of the prostate tissue that uses the time series of DCE T1-weighted images without pharmacokinetic modeling. This approach uses a number of model-free empirical parameters and also the principal component analysis (PCA) of the normalized T1-weighted intensities, as features for cancer detection from DCE MRI. The optimal set of principal components is extracted with sparse regularized regression through least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). A support vector machine classifier was used with leave-one-patient-out cross validation to determine the ability of this set of features in cancer detection. Our data is obtained from patients prior to radical prostatectomy and the results are validated based on histological evaluation of the extracted specimens. Our results, obtained on 449 tissue regions from 16 patients, show that the proposed data-driven features outperform the traditional pharmacokinetic parameters with an area under ROC of 0.86 for LASSO-isolated PCA parameters, compared to 0.78 for pharmacokinetic parameters. This shows that our novel approach to the analysis of DCE data has the potential to improve the multiparametric MRI protocol for prostate cancer detection.

[1]  D. Parkin,et al.  Global cancer statistics in the year 2000. , 2001, The Lancet. Oncology.

[2]  G. Parker,et al.  Prostate cancer: evaluation of vascular characteristics with dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging--initial experience. , 2004, Radiology.

[3]  M. Knopp,et al.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast‐enhanced t1‐weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbols , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  Piotr Kozlowski,et al.  Device for sectioning prostatectomy specimens to facilitate comparison between histology and in vivo MRI , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  Piotr Kozlowski,et al.  Combined prostate diffusion tensor imaging and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI at 3T--quantitative correlation with biopsy. , 2010, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[6]  H. Degani,et al.  Principal component analysis of breast DCE‐MRI adjusted with a model‐based method , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  Yongyi Yang,et al.  Supervised and unsupervised methods for prostate cancer segmentation with multispectral MRI. , 2010, Medical physics.

[8]  D P Dearnaley,et al.  Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of prostate cancer: correlation with morphology and tumour stage, histological grade and PSA. , 2000, Clinical radiology.

[9]  Mehdi Moradi,et al.  Improved parameter extraction and classification for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of prostate , 2014, Medical Imaging.

[10]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[11]  Jing Fang,et al.  Computerized characterization of prostate cancer by fractal analysis in MR images , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  Henkjan J Huisman,et al.  Discrimination of prostate cancer from normal peripheral zone and central gland tissue by using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. , 2003, Radiology.

[13]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent. , 2010, Journal of statistical software.

[14]  John Platt,et al.  Probabilistic Outputs for Support vector Machines and Comparisons to Regularized Likelihood Methods , 1999 .

[15]  A. Jackson,et al.  Experimentally‐derived functional form for a population‐averaged high‐temporal‐resolution arterial input function for dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  R W Veltri,et al.  Analysis of repeated biopsy results within 1 year after a noncancer diagnosis. , 2000, Urology.

[17]  B. Nicolas Bloch,et al.  3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate with combined pelvic phased-array and endorectal coils; Initial experience(1). , 2004, Academic radiology.

[18]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Microvascular invasion in prostate cancer correlates with pathologic stage. , 1995, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[19]  A Heerschap,et al.  Fast dynamic gadolinium‐enhanced MR imaging of urinary bladder and prostate cancer , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  H. Abdi,et al.  Principal component analysis , 2010 .

[21]  E W Steyerberg,et al.  Prediction of indolent prostate cancer: validation and updating of a prognostic nomogram. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[22]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[23]  P. Carroll,et al.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: present and future , 2008, Current opinion in urology.

[24]  A. Levy,et al.  Prostate Cancer: Local Staging at 3-T Endorectal MR Imaging—Early Experience , 2006 .

[25]  R B Jeffrey,et al.  Prostatic carcinoma: staging by clinical assessment, CT, and MR imaging. , 1987, Radiology.

[26]  M J Bronskill,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate. , 1985, Radiology.

[27]  A. Jackson,et al.  Comparative study into the robustness of compartmental modeling and model‐free analysis in DCE‐MRI studies , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[28]  Heng Tao Shen,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[29]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics , 2011 .

[30]  A R Padhani,et al.  Probing tumor microvascularity by measurement, analysis and display of contrast agent uptake kinetics , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[31]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Prostate cancer: multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and staging. , 2011, Radiology.

[32]  Mehdi Moradi,et al.  Multiparametric MRI maps for detection and grading of dominant prostate tumors , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[33]  B. Nicolas Bloch,et al.  Principal Component Analysis of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI in Human Prostate Cancer , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[34]  Stephan E Maier,et al.  Multiparametric MRI of prostate cancer: An update on state‐of‐the‐art techniques and their performance in detecting and localizing prostate cancer , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[35]  H. Huisman,et al.  Computerized whole slide quantification shows increased microvascular density in pT2 prostate cancer as compared to normal prostate tissue , 2009, The Prostate.

[36]  K. Pummer,et al.  Accuracy of 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging for the staging of prostate cancer in comparison to the partin tables , 2009, Acta radiologica.

[37]  P S Tofts,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Gd‐DTPA Enhancement in Breast Tumors Using a Permeability Model , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[38]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  Probability Estimates for Multi-class Classification by Pairwise Coupling , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[39]  Jurgen J Fütterer,et al.  Accuracy of multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection: a meta-analysis. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[40]  Erez Eyal,et al.  Model‐based and model‐free parametric analysis of breast dynamic‐contrast‐enhanced MRI , 2009, NMR in biomedicine.

[41]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  elastix: A Toolbox for Intensity-Based Medical Image Registration , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[42]  Piotr Kozlowski,et al.  Comparison between population average and experimentally measured arterial input function in predicting biopsy results in prostate cancer. , 2010, Academic radiology.