Event Tracking for Real-Time Unaware Sensitivity Analysis (EventTracker)

This paper introduces a platform for online Sensitivity Analysis (SA) that is applicable in large scale real-time data acquisition (DAQ) systems. Here, we use the term real-time in the context of a system that has to respond to externally generated input stimuli within a finite and specified period. Complex industrial systems such as manufacturing, healthcare, transport, and finance require high-quality information on which to base timely responses to events occurring in their volatile environments. The motivation for the proposed EventTracker platform is the assumption that modern industrial systems are able to capture data in real-time and have the necessary technological flexibility to adjust to changing system requirements. The flexibility to adapt can only be assured if data is succinctly interpreted and translated into corrective actions in a timely manner. An important factor that facilitates data interpretation and information modeling is an appreciation of the affect system inputs have on each output at the time of occurrence. Many existing sensitivity analysis methods appear to hamper efficient and timely analysis due to a reliance on historical data, or sluggishness in providing a timely solution that would be of use in real-time applications. This inefficiency is further compounded by computational limitations and the complexity of some existing models. In dealing with real-time event driven systems, the underpinning logic of the proposed method is based on the assumption that in the vast majority of cases changes in input variables will trigger events. Every single or combination of events could subsequently result in a change to the system state. The proposed event tracking sensitivity analysis method describes variables and the system state as a collection of events. The higher the numeric occurrence of an input variable at the trigger level during an event monitoring interval, the greater is its impact on the final analysis of the system state. Experiments were designed to compare the proposed event tracking sensitivity analysis method with a comparable method (that of Entropy). An improvement of 10 percent in computational efficiency without loss in accuracy was observed. The comparison also showed that the time taken to perform the sensitivity analysis was 0.5 percent of that required when using the comparable Entropy-based method.

[1]  Antonio Ambrosetti,et al.  Nonlinear Analysis and Semilinear Elliptic Problems: Contents , 2007 .

[2]  Florian Pappenberger,et al.  Multi‐method global sensitivity analysis (MMGSA) for modelling floodplain hydrological processes , 2008 .

[3]  John H. Seinfeld,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis—a computational implementation of the Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test (FAST) , 1982 .

[4]  R. Rhinehart,et al.  Correlation , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  Bernard De Baets,et al.  Unravelling the output uncertainty of a tree water flow and storage model using several global sensitivity analysis methods , 2008 .

[6]  S. Isukapalli UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS OF TRANSPORT-TRANSFORMATION MODELS , 1999 .

[7]  Hong Yue,et al.  Improving Data Fitting of a Signal Transduction Model by Global Sensitivity Analysis , 2007, 2007 American Control Conference.

[8]  Ronald W. Shonkwiler,et al.  Explorations in Monte Carlo Methods , 2009 .

[9]  Edward A. Pohl,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of availability estimates to input data characterization using design of experiments , 1998 .

[10]  Andrea Saltelli,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis for Importance Assessment , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[11]  George Z. Gertner,et al.  A general first-order global sensitivity analysis method , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[12]  K.,et al.  Nonlinear sensitivity analysis of multiparameter model systems , 1977 .

[13]  R. Lowry,et al.  Concepts and Applications of Inferential Statistics , 2014 .

[14]  Christian P. Robert,et al.  Monte Carlo Statistical Methods , 2005, Springer Texts in Statistics.

[15]  Antonio Ambrosetti,et al.  Nonlinear Analysis and Semilinear Elliptic Problems , 2007 .

[16]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  A Quantitative Model-Independent Method for Global Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output , 1999, Technometrics.

[17]  I. Sobola,et al.  Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates , 2001 .

[18]  D. Aunis,et al.  CORRELATION BETWEEN CATECHOLAMINE SECRETION FROM BOVINE ISOLATED CHROMAFFIN CELLS AND [3H]‐OUABAIN BINDING TO PLASMA MEMBRANES , 1981, British journal of pharmacology.

[19]  Roger D. Braddock,et al.  The New Morris Method: an efficient second-order screening method , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[20]  Emanuele Borgonovo,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis in inventory management , 2007 .

[21]  P. Level,et al.  Neumann expansion for fuzzy finite element analysis , 1999 .

[22]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  A comparison of sensitivity analysis techniques for complex models for environmental management , 2005 .

[23]  Alessandro Lo Schiavo,et al.  Nonlinear distortion analysis via perturbation method , 2010, Int. J. Circuit Theory Appl..

[24]  Roger David Braddock,et al.  Application of the Morris algorithm for sensitivity analysis of the REALM model for the Goulburn irrigation system , 2006 .

[25]  Bernard Krzykacz-Hausmann An approximate sensitivity analysis of results from complex computer models in the presence of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[26]  Gregory Beylkin,et al.  Fast algorithms for Helmholtz Green's functions , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[27]  Randall P. Sadowski,et al.  Simulation with Arena , 1998 .

[28]  Siamak Tavakoli,et al.  A generic framework for real-time discrete event simulation (DES) modelling , 2008, 2008 Winter Simulation Conference.