Automated bone segmentation from large field of view 3D MR images of the hip joint

Accurate bone segmentation in the hip joint region from magnetic resonance (MR) images can provide quantitative data for examining pathoanatomical conditions such as femoroacetabular impingement through to varying stages of osteoarthritis to monitor bone and associated cartilage morphometry. We evaluate two state-of-the-art methods (multi-atlas and active shape model (ASM) approaches) on bilateral MR images for automatic 3D bone segmentation in the hip region (proximal femur and innominate bone). Bilateral MR images of the hip joints were acquired at 3T from 30 volunteers. Image sequences included water-excitation dual echo stead state (FOV 38.6 × 24.1 cm, matrix 576 × 360, thickness 0.61 mm) in all subjects and multi-echo data image combination (FOV 37.6 × 23.5 cm, matrix 576 × 360, thickness 0.70 mm) for a subset of eight subjects. Following manual segmentation of femoral (head-neck, proximal-shaft) and innominate (ilium+ischium+pubis) bone, automated bone segmentation proceeded via two approaches: (1) multi-atlas segmentation incorporating non-rigid registration and (2) an advanced ASM-based scheme. Mean inter- and intra-rater reliability Dice's similarity coefficients (DSC) for manual segmentation of femoral and innominate bone were (0.970, 0.963) and (0.971, 0.965). Compared with manual data, mean DSC values for femoral and innominate bone volumes using automated multi-atlas and ASM-based methods were (0.950, 0.922) and (0.946, 0.917), respectively. Both approaches delivered accurate (high DSC values) segmentation results; notably, ASM data were generated in substantially less computational time (12 min versus 10 h). Both automated algorithms provided accurate 3D bone volumetric descriptions for MR-based measures in the hip region. The highly computational efficient ASM-based approach is more likely suitable for future clinical applications such as extracting bone-cartilage interfaces for potential cartilage segmentation.

[1]  Torsten Rohlfing,et al.  Evaluation of atlas selection strategies for atlas-based image segmentation with application to confocal microscopy images of bee brains , 2004, NeuroImage.

[2]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  Automatic MRI Atlas-Based External Beam Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning for Prostate Cancer , 2010, Prostate Cancer Imaging.

[3]  C. Pfirrmann,et al.  Cam and pincer femoroacetabular impingement: characteristic MR arthrographic findings in 50 patients. , 2006, Radiology.

[4]  R. Buxton The physics of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) , 2013, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[5]  Hideki Yoshikawa,et al.  Three-dimensional distribution of acetabular cartilage thickness in patients with hip dysplasia: a fully automated computational analysis of MR imaging. , 2004, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[6]  Guido Gerig,et al.  User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and reliability , 2006, NeuroImage.

[7]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  MESH: measuring errors between surfaces using the Hausdorff distance , 2002, Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo.

[8]  Martin Styner,et al.  Comparison and Evaluation of Methods for Liver Segmentation From CT Datasets , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Xiaodong Wu,et al.  Simultaneous Segmentation of Multiple Closed Surfaces Using Optimal Graph Searching , 2005, IPMI.

[10]  L. R. Dice Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species , 1945 .

[11]  Stefan Zachow,et al.  Model-based Auto-Segmentation of Knee Bones and Cartilage in MRI Data , 2010 .

[12]  L. Sekhar,et al.  THREE-DIMENSIONAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY , 1989, The Lancet.

[13]  Metin Nafi Gürcan,et al.  Automatic graph-cut based segmentation of bones from knee magnetic resonance images for osteoarthritis research , 2011, Medical Image Anal..

[14]  Stuart Crozier,et al.  Automatic segmentation of the bone and extraction of the bone–cartilage interface from magnetic resonance images of the knee , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Stuart Crozier,et al.  Automatic Segmentation and Quantitative Analysis of the Articular Cartilages From Magnetic Resonance Images of the Knee , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Olivier Salvado,et al.  An atlas-based electron density mapping method for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-alone treatment planning and adaptive MRI-based prostate radiation therapy. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann,et al.  Robust statistical shape models for MRI bone segmentation in presence of small field of view , 2011, Medical Image Anal..

[18]  Stuart Crozier,et al.  Automated MR Hip Bone Segmentation , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications.

[19]  J. Hodler,et al.  The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[20]  Carlos Ortiz-de-Solorzano,et al.  Combination Strategies in Multi-Atlas Image Segmentation: Application to Brain MR Data , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  J. Gower Generalized procrustes analysis , 1975 .

[22]  J. Parvizi,et al.  Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging analysis of hip morphology in the assessment of femoral acetabular impingement. , 2011, Clinical radiology.

[23]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  N4ITK: Improved N3 Bias Correction , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  Xiaodong Wu,et al.  LOGISMOS—Layered Optimal Graph Image Segmentation of Multiple Objects and Surfaces: Cartilage Segmentation in the Knee Joint , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  Wei Li,et al.  Human Hip Joint Cartilage: MRI Quantitative Thickness and Volume Measurements Discriminating Acetabulum and Femoral Head , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  Thomas M. Link,et al.  Inter-subject comparison of MRI knee cartilage thickness , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[27]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[28]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  Fast free-form deformation using graphics processing units , 2010, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[29]  S Crozier,et al.  Automated detection, 3D segmentation and analysis of high resolution spine MR images using statistical shape models , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[31]  Josien P. W. Pluim,et al.  Patient Specific Prostate Segmentation in 3-D Magnetic Resonance Images , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[32]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Valmet: A New Validation Tool for Assessing and Improving 3D Object Segmentation , 2001, MICCAI.

[33]  E. Zaragoza,et al.  Three‐dimensional computed tomography of the hip in the assessment of femoroacetabular impingement , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[34]  C E Hutchinson,et al.  MR measurement of articular cartilage thickness distribution in the hip. , 2006, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[35]  Marc Niethammer,et al.  Automatic multi-atlas-based cartilage segmentation from knee MR images , 2012, 2012 9th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).