Evaluating Resilience-Centered Development Interventions with Remote Sensing

Natural disasters are projected to increase in number and severity, in part due to climate change. At the same time a growing number of disaster risk reduction (DRR) and climate change adaptation measures are being implemented by governmental and non-governmental organizations, and substantial post-disaster donations are frequently pledged. At the same time there has been increasing demand for transparency and accountability, and thus evidence of those measures having a positive effect. We hypothesized that resilience-enhancing interventions should result in less damage during a hazard event, or at least quicker recovery. In this study we assessed recovery over a 3 year period of seven municipalities in the central Philippines devastated by Typhoon Haiyan in 2013. We used very high resolution optical images (<1 m), and created detailed land cover and land use maps for four epochs before and after the event, using a machine learning approach with extreme gradient boosting. The spatially and temporally highly variable recovery maps were then statistically related to detailed questionnaire data acquired by DEval in 2012 and 2016, whose principal aim was to assess the impact of a 10 year land-planning intervention program by the German agency for technical cooperation (GIZ). The survey data allowed very detailed insights into DRR-related perspectives, motivations and drivers of the affected population. To some extent they also helped to overcome the principal limitation of remote sensing, which can effectively describe but not explain the reasons for differential recovery. However, while a number of causal links between intervention parameters and reconstruction was found, the common notion that a resilient community should recover better and more quickly could not be confirmed. The study also revealed a number of methodological limitations, such as the high cost for commercial image data not matching the spatially extensive but also detailed scale of field evaluations, the remote sensing analysis likely overestimating damage and thus providing incorrect recovery metrics, and image data catalogues especially for more remote communities often being incomplete. Nevertheless, the study provides a valuable proof of concept for the synergies resulting from an integration of socio-economic survey data and remote sensing imagery for recovery assessment.

[1]  Edoardo Pasolli,et al.  Post-Disaster Building Database Updating Using Automated Deep Learning: An Integration of Pre-Disaster OpenStreetMap and Multi-Temporal Satellite Data , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[2]  Frank Odhiambo,et al.  Unpacking the determinants of entrepreneurship development and economic empowerment for women in Kenya , 2019 .

[3]  J. Friedman Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. , 2001 .

[4]  Lu Wang,et al.  Land-use scene classification using multi-scale completed local binary patterns , 2015, Signal, Image and Video Processing.

[5]  Tianqi Chen,et al.  XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System , 2016, KDD.

[6]  Katharine R. E. Sims,et al.  The Ecological Footprint of Poverty Alleviation: Evidence from Mexico's Oportunidades Program , 2010, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[7]  Junko Mochizuki,et al.  Reflecting Disaster Risk in Development Indicators , 2019, Sustainability.

[8]  Ariel BenYishay,et al.  A Primer on Geospatial Impact Evaluation Methods , Tools , and Applications , 2017 .

[9]  A. Lagmay,et al.  Devastating storm surges of Typhoon Haiyan , 2015 .

[10]  Sabine Vanhuysse,et al.  Very High Resolution Object-Based Land Use–Land Cover Urban Classification Using Extreme Gradient Boosting , 2018, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[11]  Akira Mano,et al.  Evaluation of the Characteristics of Human Loss and Building Damage and Reasons for the Magnification of Damage Due to Typhoon Haiyan , 2016 .

[12]  Monika Kuffer,et al.  Post-Disaster Recovery Assessment with Machine Learning-Derived Land Cover and Land Use Information , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[13]  Jörg Peters,et al.  Alleviating Deforestation Pressures? Impacts of Improved Stove Dissemination on Charcoal Consumption in Urban Senegal , 2013, Land Economics.

[14]  Anupam Anand,et al.  Improving International Development Evaluation through Geospatial Data and Analysis , 2018 .

[15]  R. Tol The Economic Impacts of Climate Change , 2018, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[16]  Claire B. Rubin,et al.  Community recovery from a major natural disaster , 1985 .

[17]  Norman Kerle,et al.  Collaborative damage mapping for emergency response: the role of Cognitive Systems Engineering , 2013 .

[18]  Rohan Sadler,et al.  Comparing supervised algorithms in Land Use and Land Cover classification of a Landsat time-series , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS).

[19]  George Vosselman,et al.  Detection of seismic façade damages with multi-temporal oblique aerial imagery , 2020 .

[20]  R. Spence,et al.  Using High-Resolution Satellite Images for Post-Earthquake Building Damage Assessment: A Study following the 26 January 2001 Gujarat Earthquake , 2004 .

[21]  A. Vetrivel,et al.  UAV-BASED STRUCTURAL DAMAGE MAPPING – RESULTS FROM 6 YEARS OF RESEARCH IN TWO EUROPEAN PROJECTS , 2019, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences.

[22]  K. Fagiewicz,et al.  Introducing nature-based solutions into urban policy – facts and gaps. Case study of Poznań , 2019, Land Use Policy.

[23]  Solomon Hsiang,et al.  Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States , 2017, Science.

[24]  Andrea Taramelli,et al.  Monitoring Green Infrastructure for Natural Water Retention Using Copernicus Global Land Products , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[25]  Sabine Vanhuysse,et al.  Less is more: optimizing classification performance through feature selection in a very-high-resolution remote sensing object-based urban application , 2018 .

[26]  Esther Duflo,et al.  Peer Effects, Teacher Incentives, and the Impact of Tracking: Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation in Kenya , 2008 .

[27]  Menandro N. Acda Fuel pellets from downed coconut (Cocos nucifera) in super typhoon Haiyan , 2015 .

[28]  Norman Kerle,et al.  Remote Sensing-Based Proxies for Urban Disaster Risk Management and Resilience: A Review , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[29]  Clay Westrope,et al.  Groundtruthing OpenStreetMap building damage assessment , 2014 .

[30]  Bo Du,et al.  Scene Classification via a Gradient Boosting Random Convolutional Network Framework , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[31]  Yi Zhu,et al.  Land use classification using convolutional neural networks applied to ground-level images , 2015, SIGSPATIAL/GIS.

[32]  Alfred Stein,et al.  Urban social vulnerability assessment with physical proxies and spatial metrics derived from air- and spaceborne imagery and GIS data , 2009 .

[33]  Jianhua Li,et al.  A Novel Image Classification Method with CNN-XGBoost Model , 2017, IWDW.

[34]  Norman Kerle,et al.  Satellite-based damage mapping following the 2006 Indonesia earthquake - How accurate was it? , 2010, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[35]  Jiann-Yeou Rau,et al.  Dynamics Monitoring and Disaster Assessment for Watershed Management Using Time-Series Satellite Images , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[36]  Diogo Duarte,et al.  Towards Real-Time Building Damage Mapping with Low-Cost UAV Solutions , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[37]  R. Fort,et al.  The homogenization effect of land titling on investment incentives: evidence from Peru , 2008 .

[38]  Lennart Bengtsson,et al.  Storm Tracks and Climate Change , 2006 .

[39]  Christian Heipke,et al.  CLASSIFICATION OF LAND COVER AND LAND USE BASED ON CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS , 2018 .

[40]  Ren Mu,et al.  Rural Roads and Local Market Development in Vietnam , 2011 .

[41]  G. Hegerl,et al.  Changes in temperature and precipitation extremes in the IPCC ensemble of global coupled model simulations , 2007 .

[42]  Marina Mueller,et al.  Potential of High-Resolution Satellite Data in the Context of Vulnerability of Buildings , 2006 .

[43]  Damon P. Coppola Chapter 1 – The Management of Disasters , 2015 .

[44]  Robin Mills,et al.  UNCOVERING COMMUNITY DISRUPTION USING REMOTE SENSING: AN ASSESSMENT OF EARLY RECOVERY IN POST-EARTHQUAKE HAITI , 2010 .

[45]  Peijun Du,et al.  A review of supervised object-based land-cover image classification , 2017 .

[46]  Raffaele Lafortezza,et al.  Nature-based solutions: Settling the issue of sustainable urbanization. , 2019, Environmental research.

[47]  David Stein,et al.  Community vulnerability assessment tool methodology , 2002 .

[48]  Jonathan Cheung-Wai Chan,et al.  Evaluation of random forest and adaboost tree-based ensemble classification and spectral band selection for ecotope mapping using airborne hyperspectral imagery , 2008 .

[49]  Timothy A. Warner,et al.  Implementation of machine-learning classification in remote sensing: an applied review , 2018 .

[50]  Norman Kerle,et al.  TOWARDS POST-DISASTER DEBRIS IDENTIFICATION FOR PRECISE DAMAGE AND RECOVERY ASSESSMENTS FROM UAV AND SATELLITE IMAGES , 2019, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences.

[51]  Miguel Esteban,et al.  Statistics of tropical cyclone landfalls in the Philippines: unusual characteristics of 2013 Typhoon Haiyan , 2015, Natural Hazards.

[52]  Ashbindu Singh,et al.  Review Article Digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data , 1989 .

[53]  Christopher G. Burton,et al.  The Development of Metrics For Community Resilience to Natural Disasters , 2012 .

[54]  Norman Kerle Satellite imaging: Disaster mapping by citizens is limited. , 2015, Nature.

[55]  B H Morrow,et al.  Identifying and mapping community vulnerability. , 1999, Disasters.

[56]  DONOR-ASSISTED LAND-USE PLANNING IN THE PHILIPPINES: INSIGHTS FROM A MULTI-LEVEL SURVEY , 2017 .

[57]  Monika Kuffer,et al.  Slums from Space - 15 Years of Slum Mapping Using Remote Sensing , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[58]  Frederico Finan,et al.  Local Electoral Incentives and Decentralized Program Performance , 2010, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[59]  P. Berke,et al.  Recovery after disaster: achieving sustainable development, mitigation and equity. , 1993, Disasters.

[60]  Molly Reif,et al.  Post-Katrina Land-Cover, Elevation, and Volume Change Assessment along the South Shore of Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana, U.S.A. , 2011 .

[61]  Norman Kerle,et al.  Disasters : risk assessment, management, and post - disaster studies using remote sensing , 2015 .

[62]  Alfred Stein,et al.  Detection of Informal Settlements from VHR Images Using Convolutional Neural Networks , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[63]  Valentyn Tolpekin,et al.  Coherence- and Amplitude-Based Analysis of Seismogenic Damage in Bam, Iran, Using ENVISAT ASAR Data , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[64]  Malte Lech,et al.  Impact, Diffusion and Scaling-Up of a Comprehensive Land-Use Planning Approach in the Philippines: From Development Cooperation to National Policies , 2018 .

[65]  Lorenzo Busetto,et al.  Rapid Assessment of Crop Status: An Application of MODIS and SAR Data to Rice Areas in Leyte, Philippines Affected by Typhoon Haiyan , 2015, Remote. Sens..