The worldwide leaf economics spectrum

Bringing together leaf trait data spanning 2,548 species and 175 sites we describe, for the first time at global scale, a universal spectrum of leaf economics consisting of key chemical, structural and physiological properties. The spectrum runs from quick to slow return on investments of nutrients and dry mass in leaves, and operates largely independently of growth form, plant functional type or biome. Categories along the spectrum would, in general, describe leaf economic variation at the global scale better than plant functional types, because functional types overlap substantially in their leaf traits. Overall, modulation of leaf traits and trait relationships by climate is surprisingly modest, although some striking and significant patterns can be seen. Reliable quantification of the leaf economics spectrum and its interaction with climate will prove valuable for modelling nutrient fluxes and vegetation boundaries under changing land-use and climate.

[1]  N. A. Maksimov,et al.  The plant in relation to water : a study of the physiological basis of drought resistance , 1929 .

[2]  R. Knight.  The Plant in Relation to Water , 1932, Nature.

[3]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[4]  R. Whittaker.  Communities and Ecosystems , 1975 .

[5]  Gordon H. Orians,et al.  A Cost-Income Model of Leaves and Roots with Special Reference to Arid and Semiarid Areas , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[6]  G. Campbell,et al.  An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics , 1977 .

[7]  Sokal Rr,et al.  Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research 2nd edition. , 1981 .

[8]  Roger G. Barry,et al.  Mountain weather and climate , 1982 .

[9]  P. Coley,et al.  HERBIVORY AND DEFENSIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF TREE SPECIES IN A LOWLAND TROPICAL FOREST , 1983 .

[10]  H. Mooney,et al.  Resource Limitation in Plants-An Economic Analogy , 1985 .

[11]  Thomas J. Givnish,et al.  On the economy of plant form and function. , 1988 .

[12]  P. Reich,et al.  Leaf Life‐Span in Relation to Leaf, Plant, and Stand Characteristics among Diverse Ecosystems , 1992 .

[13]  J. P. Grime.  1 – The Role of Plasticity in Exploiting Environmental Heterogeneity , 1994 .

[14]  E. Schulze,et al.  Relationships among Maximum Stomatal Conductance, Ecosystem Surface Conductance, Carbon Assimilation Rate, and Plant Nitrogen Nutrition: A Global Ecology Scaling Exercise , 1994 .

[15]  D. F. Parkhurst,et al.  Diffusion of CO2 and other gases inside leaves. , 1994, The New phytologist.

[16]  W. Koerselman,et al.  The vegetation N:P ratio: a new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation , 1996 .

[17]  K. Thompson,et al.  Integrated screening validates primary axes of specialisation in plants , 1997 .

[18]  Bhaskar J. Choudhury,et al.  Global Pattern of Potential Evaporation Calculated from the Penman-Monteith Equation Using Satellite and Assimilated Data , 1997 .

[19]  P. Reich,et al.  From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  K. Hikosaka,et al.  Photosynthetic nitrogen‐use efficiency in leaves of woody and herbaceous species , 1998 .

[21]  P. Reich,et al.  Relationships of leaf dark respiration to leaf nitrogen, specific leaf area and leaf life-span: a test across biomes and functional groups , 1998, Oecologia.

[22]  P. Jones,et al.  REPRESENTING TWENTIETH CENTURY SPACE-TIME CLIMATE VARIABILITY. , 1998 .

[23]  Hans Lambers,et al.  Plant Physiological Ecology , 1998, Springer New York.

[24]  Peter B. Reich,et al.  Leaf structure (specific leaf area) modulates photosynthesis–nitrogen relations: evidence from within and across species and functional groups , 1998 .

[25]  Richard J. Williams,et al.  Carbon and nitrogen isotope discrimination and nitrogen nutrition of trees along a rainfall gradient in northern Australia , 1998 .

[26]  John R. Evans,et al.  Photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency of species that differ inherently in specific leaf area , 1998, Oecologia.

[27]  P. Reich,et al.  Generality of leaf trait relationships: a test across six biomes: Ecology , 1999 .

[28]  Andrew G. Peterson,et al.  Reconciling the apparent difference between mass- and area-based expressions of the photosynthesis-nitrogen relationship , 1999, Oecologia.

[29]  P. Jones,et al.  Representing Twentieth-Century Space–Time Climate Variability. Part I: Development of a 1961–90 Mean Monthly Terrestrial Climatology , 1999 .

[30]  P. D. Körner.  Alpine Plant Life , 1999, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[31]  Ülo Niinemets,et al.  Research review. Components of leaf dry mass per area – thickness and density – alter leaf photosynthetic capacity in reverse directions in woody plants , 1999 .

[32]  J. H. M. Thornley,et al.  Modelling the Components of Plant Respiration: Some Guiding Principles , 2000 .

[33]  Jacob McC. Overton,et al.  Shifts in trait‐combinations along rainfall and phosphorus gradients , 2000 .

[34]  T. Sharkey,et al.  Photosynthesis : physiology and metabolism , 2000 .

[35]  P. Reich,et al.  SEED SIZE, NITROGEN SUPPLY, AND GROWTH RATE AFFECT TREE SEEDLING SURVIVAL IN DEEP SHADE , 2000 .

[36]  F. Loreto,et al.  Acquisition and Diffusion of CO2 in Higher Plant Leaves , 2000 .

[37]  Mark Westoby,et al.  The Time Value of Leaf Area , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[38]  P. Mazliak.  “Alpine Plant Life Functional Plant Ecology of high mountain ecosystems”, Christian Korner. Springer (1999), 338, et 4 planches de photographies en couleurs , 2000 .

[39]  E. Johnson,et al.  Alpine Plant Life: Functional Plant Ecology of High Mountain Ecosystems , 2001 .

[40]  E. Kruger,et al.  Light-mediated constraints on leaf function correlate with leaf structure among deciduous and evergreen tree species. , 2001, Tree physiology.

[41]  Ülo Niinemets,et al.  GLOBAL-SCALE CLIMATIC CONTROLS OF LEAF DRY MASS PER AREA, DENSITY, AND THICKNESS IN TREES AND SHRUBS , 2001 .

[42]  P. Reich,et al.  Strategy shifts in leaf physiology, structure and nutrient content between species of high‐ and low‐rainfall and high‐ and low‐nutrient habitats , 2001 .

[43]  R. Villar,et al.  Comparison of leaf construction costs in woody species with differing leaf life-spans in contrasting ecosystems. , 2001, The New phytologist.

[44]  J. Elser,et al.  Ecological Stoichiometry: The Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere , 2002 .

[45]  Keith W. Oleson,et al.  Landscapes as patches of plant functional types: An integrating concept for climate and ecosystem models , 2002 .

[46]  M. Westoby,et al.  Leaves at low versus high rainfall: coordination of structure, lifespan and physiology. , 2002, The New phytologist.

[47]  P. Reich,et al.  Least‐Cost Input Mixtures of Water and Nitrogen for Photosynthesis , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[48]  G. Farquhar,et al.  Optimal stomatal control in relation to leaf area and nitrogen content , 2002 .

[49]  P. Reich,et al.  Nutrient conservation increases with latitude of origin in European Pinus sylvestris populations , 2003, Oecologia.

[50]  M. Westoby,et al.  Nutrient concentration, resorption and lifespan: leaf traits of Australian sclerophyll species , 2003 .

[51]  Hendrik Poorter,et al.  Inherent Variation in Growth Rate Between Higher Plants: A Search for Physiological Causes and Ecological Consequences , 1992 .

[52]  D. Ackerly,et al.  Leaf dynamics, self-shading and carbon gain in seedlings of a tropical pioneer tree , 1995, Oecologia.

[53]  P. Reich,et al.  Photosynthesis-nitrogen relations in Amazonian tree species , 1994, Oecologia.

[54]  John L. Harper,et al.  The value of a leaf , 1989, Oecologia.

[55]  M. P.R.,et al.  A METHOD FOR SCALING VEGETATION DYNAMICS: THE ECOSYSTEM DEMOGRAPHY MODEL (ED) , 2022 .