Two is better than one: Physical interactions improve motor performance in humans

How do physical interactions with others change our own motor behavior? Utilizing a novel motor learning paradigm in which the hands of two - individuals are physically connected without their conscious awareness, we investigated how the interaction forces from a partner adapt the motor behavior in physically interacting humans. We observed the motor adaptations during physical interactions to be mutually beneficial such that both the worse and better of the interacting partners improve motor performance during and after interactive practice. We show that these benefits cannot be explained by multi-sensory integration by an individual, but require physical interaction with a reactive partner. Furthermore, the benefits are determined by both the interacting partner's performance and similarity of the partner's behavior to one's own. Our results demonstrate the fundamental neural processes underlying human physical interactions and suggest advantages of interactive paradigms for sport-training and physical rehabilitation.

[1]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[2]  G. Csibra Action mirroring and action understanding: an alternative account , 1993 .

[3]  S. Baron-Cohen Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind , 1997 .

[4]  A. Goldman,et al.  Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  Robert A. Henning,et al.  Can Teams Outperform Individuals in a Simulated Dynamic Control Task? , 2000 .

[6]  J. Decety,et al.  From the perception of action to the understanding of intention , 2001, Nature reviews. Neuroscience.

[7]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[8]  K. Doya,et al.  A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[9]  G. Knoblich,et al.  Action coordination in groups and individuals: learning anticipatory control. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  R. Adolphs Cognitive neuroscience: Cognitive neuroscience of human social behaviour , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[11]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning , 2004, Nature.

[12]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[13]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Mental state inference using visual control parameters. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[14]  Andrew A G Mattar,et al.  Motor Learning by Observing , 2005, Neuron.

[15]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Joint action: bodies and minds moving together , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  V. Gallese Before and below ‘theory of mind’: embodied simulation and the neural correlates of social cognition , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  Jurjen Bosga,et al.  Joint-action coordination of redundant force contributions in a virtual lifting task. , 2007, Motor control.

[18]  C. Frith,et al.  The role of social cognition in decision making , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  C. Urgesi,et al.  Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  Ruud G. J. Meulenbroek,et al.  Anatomical substrates of cooperative joint-action in a continuous motor task: Virtual lifting and balancing , 2008, NeuroImage.

[21]  Kyle B. Reed,et al.  Physical Collaboration of Human-Human and Human-Robot Teams , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[22]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[23]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Inside the brain of an elite athlete: the neural processes that support high achievement in sports , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[24]  E. Burdet,et al.  Robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function. , 2010, Current opinion in neurology.

[25]  A. Endress,et al.  The Social Sense: Susceptibility to Others’ Beliefs in Human Infants and Adults , 2010, Science.

[26]  P. Latham,et al.  References and Notes Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S11 References Movie S1 Optimally Interacting Minds R�ports , 2022 .

[27]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[28]  Y. Rossetti,et al.  Seeing Your Error Alters My Pointing: Observing Systematic Pointing Errors Induces Sensori-Motor After-Effects , 2011, PloS one.

[29]  Robrecht P R D van der Wel,et al.  Let the force be with us: dyads exploit haptic coupling for coordination. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  Karen Zentgraf,et al.  Simulation during observation of human actions – Theories, empirical studies, applications , 2011, Vision Research.

[31]  野嶌 一平 Human motor plasticity induced by mirror visual feedback , 2012 .

[32]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Interpersonal body and neural synchronization as a marker of implicit social interaction , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[33]  Hidenao Fukuyama,et al.  Human Motor Plasticity Induced by Mirror Visual Feedback , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.