Determining the shape of the productivity function for mechanized felling and felling-processing

Productivity studies in forest operations are often carried out on new equipment, or on equipment being used in new conditions. Understanding how stand and terrain parameters impact the productivity of harvesting machines is important for determining their optimum use. Such information is normally presented as a productivity or efficiency function; that is, a regression equation that best represents the data. Most studies establish that piece size is the dominant predictor that impacts overall productivity. A common concept known as the “piece-size law” is that productivity increases at a decreasing rate with increasing piece size. What is not well understood is the upper limit to this piece-size law. That is, as the trees get “too” large, we can expect the machine to start to struggle, resulting in a decrease in productivity. Four different data sets—two based in New Zealand and two in Italy—are presented that clearly show an “optimum” piece size for maximum productivity. On average, productivity tended to decrease gradually, not drop off suddenly beyond the optimum. Using more complex statistical functions, it was possible to correctly correlate piece size to productivity.

[1]  N. Magagnotti,et al.  The effects of introducing modern technology on the financial, labour and energy performance of forest operations in the Italian Alps , 2011 .

[2]  Jori Uusitalo,et al.  Characteristics and Significance of a Harvester Operators’ Working Technique in Thinnings , 2004 .

[3]  Lars Eliasson,et al.  Simulation study of a single-grip harvester in thinning from below and thinning from above , 1999 .

[4]  Natascia Magagnotti,et al.  Performance and cost of a new mini-forwarder for use in thinning operations , 2010, Journal of Forest Research.

[5]  T. Evanson,et al.  Productivity Measurements of Two Waratah 234 Hydraulic Tree Harvesters in Radiata Pine in New Zealand , 1996 .

[6]  Jennifer L Bell,et al.  Changes in logging injury rates associated with use of feller-bunchers in West Virginia. , 2002, Journal of safety research.

[7]  Matthew A. Holtzscher,et al.  Tree diameter effects on cost and productivity of cut-to-length systems , 1997 .

[8]  Glen Murphy,et al.  Modelling the economics of extended shift and 4/7 forest harvesting * , 2007 .

[9]  Bruce R. Hartsough,et al.  Productivity standards for harvesters and processors in Italy. , 2010 .

[10]  Han-Sup Han,et al.  Productivity and cost of cut-to-length and whole-tree harvesting in a mixed-conifer stand , 2007 .

[11]  Dan Glade,et al.  Single- and Double-Grip Harvesters – Productive Measurements in Final Cutting of Shelterwood , 2013 .

[12]  Matti Sirén,et al.  Productivity and Costs of Thinning Harvesters and Harvester-Forwarders , 2003 .

[13]  Anders Grönlund,et al.  Assessing the role of the harvester within the forestry-wood chain , 2001 .

[14]  Dag Fjeld,et al.  Single-tree and Group Selection in Montane Norway Spruce Stands: Factors Influencing Operational Efficiency , 2001 .

[15]  Jori Uusitalo,et al.  Time consumption analysis of the mechanized cut-to-length harvesting system , 2006 .

[16]  Karl Stampfer,et al.  Cable Extraction of Harvester-Felled Thinnings: An Austrian Case Study , 2013 .

[17]  M. Nakagawa,et al.  Effect of tree size on time of each work element and processing productivity using an excavator-based single-grip harvester or processor at a landing , 2010, Journal of Forest Research.

[18]  Metsäteho Oy,et al.  Productivity and Cutting Costs of Thinning Harvesters , 2004 .

[19]  Masahiko Nakagawa,et al.  Effect of Tree Size on Productivity and Time Required for Work Elements in Selective Thinning by a Harvester , 2007 .

[21]  Lars Eliasson,et al.  Simulation of thinning with a single-grip harvester , 1999 .

[22]  Karl Stampfer,et al.  Tree-length system evaluation of second thinning in a loblolly pine plantation , 2003 .

[23]  Raffaele Spinelli,et al.  Analyzing and Estimating Delays in Harvester Operations , 2008 .

[24]  Raffaele Spinelli,et al.  Productivity and cost of CTL harvesting of Eucalyptus globulus stands using excavator-based harvesters , 2002 .

[25]  Jingxin Wang,et al.  Production analysis of an excavator-based harvester: A case study in Finnish forest operations , 2002 .