Making the case for Crew-Centered Design (CCD) in merchant shipping

Since 2003, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) has emphasised the need to address and integrate ergonomics knowledge in a concerted manner. However, there is little guidance on the application of this knowledge in the design of merchant vessels. Utilizing a mixed methods approach, the paper identifies the need for crew-centered design (CCD), highlighting the importance of using concepts derived from Human-Centred Design (HCD) to be able to design work spaces and operational procedures that facilitate the work of the crew on board. Drawing upon results obtained from accident analysis (utilising the Technique for the Retrospective and predictive Analysis of Cognitive Errors TRACEr) and 24 semi-structured interviews, this paper identifies areas in which it could be potentially beneficial to integrate end-users in the design of ships and shipborne operations. This paper further discusses why and how concepts rooted in HCD could be used to improve maritime workspace and interface design, as well as the design of procedures and shipborne operations. However, due to the specifics of the maritime domain, the authors propose that there is the need to expand the HCD perspective, making the design not only fit a single user, but to fit the crew as part of a maritime socio-technical system. The paper discusses that the case for CCD is imperative in the interest of safety, efficiency and even makes economic sense.

[1]  Margareta Lützhöft,et al.  On Your Watch: Automation on the Bridge , 2002, Journal of Navigation.

[2]  Erik Styhr Petersen,et al.  Making the Phantom Real: A Case of Applied Maritime Human Factors , 2010 .

[3]  Margareta Lützhöft,et al.  Functions, performances and perceptions of work on ships , 2014 .

[4]  Margareta Lützhöft,et al.  “Safety is everywhere”-The Constituents of Maritime Safety , 2011 .

[5]  Margareta Ljung,et al.  Function based manning and aspects of flexibility , 2010 .

[6]  Margareta Lützhöft,et al.  THE VALUES OF ERGONOMICS IN SHIP DESIGN AND OPERATION , 2014 .

[7]  William Finlay,et al.  Getting the Goods: Ports, Labor, and the Logistics Revolution , 2009 .

[8]  Barry Kirwan,et al.  Development and application of a human error identification tool for air traffic control. , 2002, Applied ergonomics.

[9]  D. L. Simms,et al.  Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies , 1986 .

[10]  Lars-Ola Bligård,et al.  Using 2D and 3D models as tools during a workplace design process – a question of how and when , 2014 .

[11]  Guilin Dai,et al.  Review of maritime transportation air emission pollution and policy analysis , 2009 .

[12]  Knud Benedict,et al.  Simulation Augmented Manoeuvring Design and Monitoring - a New Method for Advanced Ship Handling , 2014 .

[13]  Cecilia Österman,et al.  Beyond the ethic case: a value proposition of proactive human factors management , 2013 .

[14]  Bjørn Egil Asbjørnslett,et al.  Human Factors in Ship Design and Operation: A Preliminary Survey of the Theoretical Construct , 2016 .

[15]  Ah Kuan Seah,et al.  Maritime Accidents and Human Performance: the Statistical Trail , 2004 .

[16]  Gesa Praetorius,et al.  Communicating intended routes in ECDIS: evaluating technological change. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  J. Harvey Evans BASIC DESIGN CONCEPTS , 2009 .