The Relative Importance of Vulnerability and Efficiency in COVID-19 Contact Tracing Programmes: A Discrete Choice Experiment

Objectives: This study aims to assess the trade-offs between vulnerability and efficiency attributes of contact tracing programmes based on preferences of COVID-19 contact tracing practitioners, researchers and other relevant stakeholders at the global level. Methods: We conducted an online discrete choice experiment (DCE). Respondents were recruited globally to explore preferences according to country income level and the prevailing epidemiology of COVID-19 in the local setting. The DCE attributes represented efficiency (timeliness, completeness, number of contacts), vulnerability (vulnerable population), cooperation and privacy. A mixed-logit model and latent class analysis were used. Results: The number of respondents was 181. Timeliness was the most important attribute regardless of country income level and COVID-19 epidemiological condition. Vulnerability of contacts was the second most important attribute for low-to-lower-middle-income countries and third for upper-middle-to-high income countries. When normalised against conditional relative importance of timeliness, conditional relative importance of vulnerability ranged from 0.38 to 0.42. Conclusion: Vulnerability and efficiency criteria were both considered to be important attributes of contact tracing programmes. However, the relative values placed on these criteria varied significantly between epidemiological and economic context.

[1]  John C Mubangizi Poor Lives Matter: COVID-19 and the Plight of Vulnerable Groups with Specific Reference to Poverty and Inequality in South Africa , 2021, Journal of African Law.

[2]  Dominik Rehse,et al.  Fostering participation in digital contact tracing , 2021, Information Economics and Policy.

[3]  H. Al Zabadi,et al.  Assessment of Quarantine Understanding and Adherence to Lockdown Measures During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Palestine: Community Experience and Evidence for Action , 2021, Frontiers in Public Health.

[4]  David W. S. Wong,et al.  Spreading of COVID-19: Density matters , 2020, PloS one.

[5]  D. Lewis Why many countries failed at COVID contact-tracing — but some got it right , 2020, Nature.

[6]  R. Siegel,et al.  The Impact of COVID-19 on Vulnerable Populations and Implications for Children and Health Care Policy , 2020, Clinical pediatrics.

[7]  Tadele Girum,et al.  Global strategies and effectiveness for COVID-19 prevention through contact tracing, screening, quarantine, and isolation: a systematic review , 2020, Tropical Medicine and Health.

[8]  G. Rubin,et al.  Facilitators and barriers to engagement with contact tracing during infectious disease outbreaks: A rapid review of the evidence , 2020, PloS one.

[9]  K. Peleg,et al.  Income assurances are a crucial factor in determining public compliance with self-isolation regulations during the COVID-19 outbreak – cohort study in Israel , 2020, Israel Journal of Health Policy Research.

[10]  R. de Groot,et al.  COVID-19 response in low- and middle-income countries: Don’t overlook the role of mobile phone communication , 2020, International Journal of Infectious Diseases.

[11]  E. Shadmi,et al.  Health equity and COVID-19: global perspectives , 2020, International Journal for Equity in Health.

[12]  Christl A. Donnelly,et al.  The impact of COVID-19 and strategies for mitigation and suppression in low- and middle-income countries , 2020, Science.

[13]  Jemima A. Frimpong,et al.  Financial Incentives for Downloading COVID–19 Digital Contact Tracing Apps , 2020 .

[14]  J. Veldwijk,et al.  COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps: Predicted Uptake in the Netherlands Based on a Discrete Choice Experiment , 2020, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[15]  World Health Organization Contact tracing in the context of COVID-19. Interim guidance , 2020, Pediatria i Medycyna Rodzinna.

[16]  David C Christiani,et al.  Work-related COVID-19 transmission in six Asian countries/areas: A follow-up study , 2020, PloS one.

[17]  Tony Kirby,et al.  Evidence mounts on the disproportionate effect of COVID-19 on ethnic minorities , 2020, The Lancet Respiratory Medicine.

[18]  Caroline Wiertz,et al.  Predicted Adoption Rates of Contact Tracing App Configurations - Insights from a Choice-Based Conjoint Study with a Representative Sample of the UK population , 2020 .

[19]  G. Rubin,et al.  How to improve adherence with quarantine: rapid review of the evidence , 2020, Public Health.

[20]  J. Gagné Literature Review , 2018, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[21]  Shrivastava Saurabh,et al.  Role of contact tracing in containing the 2014 Ebola outbreak: a review. , 2017, African health sciences.

[22]  Stavros Petrou,et al.  Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Review of the Literature , 2014, PharmacoEconomics.

[23]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[24]  V. Featherstone,et al.  A RAPID REVIEW OF THE EVIDENCE , 2014 .

[25]  Deborah Marshall,et al.  Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force. , 2013, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[26]  Mandy Ryan,et al.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. , 2012, Health economics.

[27]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[28]  Andrew Lloyd,et al.  Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. , 2011, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[29]  Barbara McPake,et al.  How to do (or not to do) ... Designing a discrete choice experiment for application in a low-income country. , 2009, Health policy and planning.

[30]  Michel Champagne,et al.  To do or not to do. , 2007, International journal of orthodontics.

[31]  A. R.,et al.  Review of literature , 1951, American Potato Journal.

[32]  P Speck,et al.  Global perspectives , 1999, Palliative medicine.

[33]  I. Krinsky,et al.  On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities , 1986 .

[34]  Robert C. Wolpert,et al.  A Review of the , 1985 .

[35]  C. Paúl,et al.  Education, leisure activities and cognitive and functional ability of Alzheimer's disease patients: A follow-up study , 2013, Dementia & neuropsychologia.