The impact of ischemic intervals on neuromuscular recovery in a porcine (Sus scrofa) survival model of extremity vascular injury.

BACKGROUND Despite advances in revascularization following extremity vascular injury, the relationship between time to restoration of flow and functional limb salvage is unknown. The objectives of this study are to describe a large animal survival model of hind limb ischemia/reperfusion and define neuromuscular recovery following increasing ischemic periods. METHODS Sus scrofa swine (N = 38; weight, 87 ± 6.2 kg) were randomized to iliac artery occlusion for 0 (Control), 1 (1HR), 3 (3HR), or 6 (6HR) hours, followed by vessel repair and 14 days of recovery. Additionally, one group underwent iliac artery division with no restoration of flow (Ligation), and one group underwent iliac artery exposure only without intervention (Sham). A composite physiologic measure of recovery (PMR) was generated to assess group differences over 14 days of survival. PMR included limb function (Tarlov score) and electrophysiologic measures (compound muscle action potential amplitude, sensory nerve action potential amplitude, and nerve conduction velocity). Using the PMR and extrapolating the point at which recovery following ligation crosses the slope connecting recovery after 3 and 6 hours of ischemia, an estimate of the ischemic threshold for the hind limb is made. These results were correlated with peroneus muscle and peroneal nerve histology. RESULTS Baseline physiologic characteristics were similar between groups. Neuromuscular recovery in groups with early restoration of flow (Control, 1HR, 3HR) was similar and nearly complete (92%, 98%, and 88%, respectively; P > .45). While recovery was diminished in both 6HR and Ligation, Ligation, rather than repair, exhibited greater recovery (68% vs 53%; P < .05). These relationships correlated with the pathologic grade of degeneration, necrosis, and fibrosis (P < .05). The PMR model predicts minimal and similar persistent loss of function in groups undergoing early surgical restoration of flow (Control 8%, 1HR 1%, 3HR 12%; P > .45). In contrast, the Ligation group exhibited the greatest degree of injury early in the reperfusion period, followed by more complete recovery and at a faster rate than 6HR. Extrapolating from the PMR the point at which Ligation (68% recovery) crosses the slope connecting 3 hours (84% recovery) and 6 hours (53% recovery) of ischemia estimates the ischemic threshold to be 4.7 hours. Restoration of flow at ischemic intervals exceeding this are associated with less physiologic recovery than ligation. CONCLUSION In this model, surgical and therapeutic adjuncts to restore extremity perfusion early (1-3 hours) after extremity vascular injury are most likely to provide outcomes benefit compared with delayed restoration of flow or ligation. Furthermore, the ischemic threshold of the extremity after which neuromuscular recovery is significantly diminished is less than 5 hours. Additional studies are necessary to determine the effect of other factors such as shock or therapeutic measures on this ischemic threshold.

[1]  N M Rich,et al.  Acute arterial injuries in Vietnam: 1,000 cases. , 1970, The Journal of trauma.

[2]  E. Homsher,et al.  Differential recovery of skeletal muscle and peripheral nerve function after ischemia and reperfusion. , 1989, The Journal of surgical research.

[3]  Todd E Rasmussen,et al.  Early versus delayed restoration of flow with temporary vascular shunt reduces circulating markers of injury in a porcine model. , 2009, The Journal of trauma.

[4]  Todd E Rasmussen,et al.  In-theater management of vascular injury: 2 years of the Balad Vascular Registry. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[5]  D. Feliciano,et al.  Damage control techniques for common and external iliac artery injuries: have temporary intravascular shunts replaced the need for ligation? , 2010, The Journal of trauma.

[6]  T. Burdon,et al.  A demonstration of vascular proliferation in response to arteriovenous reversal in the ischemic canine hind limb. , 1989, The Journal of surgical research.

[7]  Michael A. Peck,et al.  The use of temporary vascular shunts as a damage control adjunct in the management of wartime vascular injury. , 2006, The Journal of trauma.

[8]  M. Giraud,et al.  Basic Control of Reperfusion Effectively Protects Against Reperfusion Injury in a Realistic Rodent Model of Acute Limb Ischemia , 2008, Circulation.

[9]  Lyell K. Jones,et al.  A large animal survival model (Sus scrofa) of extremity ischemia/reperfusion and neuromuscular outcomes assessment: a pilot study. , 2010, The Journal of trauma.

[10]  T. Lindsay,et al.  Quantitation of postischemic skeletal muscle necrosis: histochemical and radioisotope techniques. , 1988, The Journal of surgical research.

[11]  R. Littell.  ANALYSIS OF REPEATED MEASURES DATA , 1990 .

[12]  E. Brogi,et al.  Therapeutic angiogenesis. A single intraarterial bolus of vascular endothelial growth factor augments revascularization in a rabbit ischemic hind limb model. , 1994, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[13]  A. Seaber,et al.  The influence of magnitude and duration of crush load on functional recovery of the peripheral nerve. , 1993, Journal of reconstructive microsurgery.

[14]  H. Ackermann,et al.  The influence of controlled limb reperfusion with PGE1 on reperfusion injury after prolonged ischemia. , 2009, The Journal of surgical research.

[15]  J. Alroy,et al.  Favorable effect of VEGF gene transfer on ischemic peripheral neuropathy , 2000, Nature Medicine.

[16]  T. Nishibe,et al.  Limb ischemia after iliac ligation in aged mice stimulates angiogenesis without arteriogenesis. , 2009, Journal of vascular surgery.

[17]  J. Michalek,et al.  From the Southern Association for Vascular Surgery Effect of temporary shunting on extremity vascular injury : An outcome analysis from the Global War on Terror vascular injury initiative , 2022 .

[18]  F. Beyersdorf,et al.  Reperfusion Injury in Skeletal Muscle: Controlled Limb Reperfusion Reduces Local and Systemic Complications after Prolonged Ischaemia , 1994, Cardiovascular surgery.

[19]  Michael A. Peck,et al.  Penetrating femoropopliteal injury during modern warfare: experience of the Balad Vascular Registry. , 2008, Journal of vascular surgery.

[20]  A. Gawande,et al.  Casualties of war--military care for the wounded from Iraq and Afghanistan. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  L. Eriksson,et al.  A porcine model of acute quadriplegic myopathy: a feasibility study , 2006, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[22]  K. Scheffler,et al.  Invasive and non-invasive evaluation of spontaneous arteriogenesis in a novel porcine model for peripheral arterial obstructive disease. , 2003, Atherosclerosis.

[23]  K. Peters,et al.  Preclinical models of human peripheral arterial occlusive disease: implications for investigation of therapeutic agents. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.

[24]  G. Moneta.  Damage Control Techniques for Common and External Iliac Artery Injuries: Have Temporary Intravascular Shunts Replaced the Need for Ligation? , 2011 .

[25]  Raymond Fang,et al.  Complications after fasciotomy revision and delayed compartment release in combat patients. , 2008, The Journal of trauma.

[26]  G. Nikiforidis,et al.  Thrombin promotes arteriogenesis and hemodynamic recovery in a rabbit hindlimb ischemia model. , 2009, Journal of vascular surgery.

[27]  M. Debakey,et al.  Battle injuries of the arteries in World War II. , 1946, Bulletin of the U.S. Army Medical Department. United States. Army. Medical Department.