Can co-creation lead to better strategy? An exploratory research

In this article, we propose co-creation as a more efficient and effective way of formulating and implementing strategy. We rely on the foundations of procedural justice theory which states that when a decision making process is considered as “fair”, people to whom the process is applied demonstrate a higher level of trust and commitment. A fair process implies that people can voice their opinion and feel part of a group. These two requirements are often not considered enough in “traditional” strategy processes. We identify co-creation as a tool to address the fair process requirements of being heard and belong to a community. Taking these requirements into account will improve both the strategy formulation (e.g. because more and better ideas are generated) and the strategy implementation (e.g. because of a larger buy-in of middle management). Using an exploratory co-creation research setting we explored to what extent corporations are actually following fair process principles in their strategy creation process and what is their appetite for strategy co-creation. From this test, it appeared that major concerns exist with respect to the current strategy creation process and a strong desire to introduce co-creation principles and techniques in that process. Finally, we propose a conceptual model explaining how fair process can be applied through co-creation and lead to improved strategy selection and implementation. As such, we aim to contribute to the analyses of the drivers, the potential and the application of an “open strategy” approach.

[1]  R. Grant Contemporary Strategy Analysis , 2005 .

[2]  S. Anderson,et al.  Applying Large-Group Interaction Methods in the Planning and Implementation of Major Change Efforts. , 2000 .

[3]  Laura B. Cardinal,et al.  Strategic Planning and Firm Performance: A Synthesis of More Than Two Decades of Research , 1994 .

[4]  Joel Brockner,et al.  Why it's so hard to be fair , 2006 .

[5]  R. Mauborgne,et al.  Procedural justice, strategic decision making, and the knowledge economy , 1998 .

[6]  J. Child Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice , 1972 .

[7]  H. Chesbrough The Era of Open Innovation , 2003 .

[8]  Sarah Kaplan,et al.  The Real Value of Strategic Planning , 2003 .

[9]  D. Schweiger,et al.  Building Commitment, Attachment, and Trust in Strategic Decision-Making Teams: The Role of Procedural Justice , 1995 .

[10]  Peter J. Brews Star Trek Strategy: Real Strategy at Work , 2003 .

[11]  J. Brockner,et al.  An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  J. I. Canales,et al.  Can Strategic Planning Make Strategy More Relevant and Build Commitment Over Time? The Case of RACC , 2008 .

[13]  Henry Mintzberg The design school: Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management , 1990 .

[14]  R. Whittington,et al.  Opening Strategy: Evolution of a Precarious Profession , 2011 .

[15]  O. Bjelland,et al.  An Inside View of IBM's 'Innovation Jam' , 2008 .

[16]  Sayan Chatterjee,et al.  Democratizing Strategy: How Crowdsourcing Can Be Used for Strategy Dialogues , 2012 .

[17]  Michael C. Mankins Stop wasting valuable time. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[18]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Making Fast Strategic Decisions In High-Velocity Environments , 1989 .

[19]  David J. Collis,et al.  Can you say what your strategy is? , 2008, Harvard business review.

[20]  Andreas Herrmann,et al.  Conformity and the Crowd , 2013 .

[21]  Moshe Farjoun Towards an organic perspective on strategy , 2002 .

[22]  Ludo Van der Heyden,et al.  Why Fairness Matters , 2007 .

[23]  V. Ramaswamy Competing through co‐creation: innovation at two companies , 2010 .

[24]  Peter J. Brews,et al.  Learning to plan and planning to learn: resolving the planning school/learning school debate , 1999 .