An Improved High-Dimensional Kriging Surrogate Modeling Method through Principal Component Dimension Reduction

The Kriging surrogate model in complex simulation problems uses as few expensive objectives as possible to establish a global or local approximate interpolation. However, due to the inversion of the covariance correlation matrix and the solving of Kriging-related parameters, the Kriging approximation process for high-dimensional problems is time consuming and even impossible to construct. For this reason, a high-dimensional Kriging modeling method through principal component dimension reduction (HDKM-PCDR) is proposed by considering the correlation parameters and the design variables of a Kriging model. It uses PCDR to transform a high-dimensional correlation parameter vector in Kriging into low-dimensional one, which is used to reconstruct a new correlation function. In this way, time consumption of correlation parameter optimization and correlation function matrix construction in the Kriging modeling process is greatly reduced. Compared with the original Kriging method and the high-dimensional Kriging modeling method based on partial least squares, the proposed method can achieve faster modeling efficiency under the premise of meeting certain accuracy requirements.

[1]  Yaohui Li,et al.  An adaptive Kriging method with double sampling criteria applied to hydrogen preparation case , 2020 .

[2]  Junjun Shi,et al.  A kriging-based adaptive global optimization method with generalized expected improvement and its application in numerical simulation and crop evapotranspiration , 2020 .

[3]  Liang Zhao,et al.  A distance correlation-based Kriging modeling method for high-dimensional problems , 2020, Knowl. Based Syst..

[4]  Zhenzhou Lu,et al.  An enhanced Kriging surrogate modeling technique for high-dimensional problems , 2020 .

[5]  Mokhtar Che Ismail,et al.  Two steps hybrid calibration algorithm of support vector regression and K-nearest neighbors , 2020 .

[6]  Wenxi Lu,et al.  Multiobjective optimization of the groundwater exploitation layout in coastal areas based on multiple surrogate models , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[7]  S. Marelli,et al.  EXTENDING CLASSICAL SURROGATE MODELING TO HIGH DIMENSIONS THROUGH SUPERVISED DIMENSIONALITY REDUCTION: A DATA-DRIVEN APPROACH , 2018, International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification.

[8]  Hao Wang,et al.  Cluster-based Kriging approximation algorithms for complexity reduction , 2017, Applied Intelligence.

[9]  Dhruv Chauhan,et al.  Review on Dimensionality Reduction Techniques , 2019 .

[10]  Mohsen Rashki,et al.  Classification correction of polynomial response surface methods for accurate reliability estimation , 2019, Structural Safety.

[11]  Junjie Li,et al.  Health diagnosis of concrete dams using hybrid FWA with RBF-based surrogate model , 2019, Water Science and Engineering.

[12]  Xiaoli Yang,et al.  An efficient uniform design for Kriging-based response surface method and its application , 2019, Computers and Geotechnics.

[13]  Liang Gao,et al.  A screening-based gradient-enhanced Kriging modeling method for high-dimensional problems , 2019, Applied Mathematical Modelling.

[14]  Xiuli Shen,et al.  An improved support vector regression using least squares method , 2018 .

[15]  Achintya Haldar,et al.  Site-specific seismic design of damage tolerant structural systems using a novel concept , 2018, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[16]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Gradient-enhanced kriging for high-dimensional problems , 2017, Engineering with Computers.

[17]  Ozgur Kisi,et al.  Comparison of four heuristic regression techniques in solar radiation modeling: Kriging method vs RSM, MARS and M5 model tree , 2018 .

[18]  Jean-Antoine Désidéri,et al.  Multifidelity surrogate modeling based on radial basis functions , 2017 .

[19]  Shigeru Obayashi,et al.  Kriging surrogate model with coordinate transformation based on likelihood and gradient , 2017, J. Glob. Optim..

[20]  Willis A. Jensen.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments 4th edition , 2017 .

[21]  Aki Vehtari,et al.  Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC , 2015, Statistics and Computing.

[22]  Joseph Morlier,et al.  An Improved Approach for Estimating the Hyperparameters of the Kriging Model for High-Dimensional Problems through the Partial Least Squares Method , 2016 .

[23]  J. Morlier,et al.  Improving kriging surrogates of high-dimensional design models by Partial Least Squares dimension reduction , 2016, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[24]  Qifu Wang,et al.  Sparsity-promoting polynomial response surface: A new surrogate model for response prediction , 2014, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[25]  Qingfu Zhang,et al.  A Gaussian Process Surrogate Model Assisted Evolutionary Algorithm for Medium Scale Expensive Optimization Problems , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[26]  Kambiz Haji Hajikolaei,et al.  High Dimensional Model Representation With Principal Component Analysis , 2014 .

[27]  B. Sudret,et al.  Reliability-based design optimization using kriging surrogates and subset simulation , 2011, 1104.3667.

[28]  Jay D. Martin,et al.  Computational Improvements to Estimating Kriging Metamodel Parameters , 2009 .

[29]  Boxin Tang,et al.  Latin Hypercube Designs , 2008 .

[30]  Irfan Kaymaz,et al.  Application Of Kriging Method To Structural Reliability Problems , 2005 .

[31]  T. Simpson,et al.  Use of Kriging Models to Approximate Deterministic Computer Models , 2005 .

[32]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .