J-SAP study 1-2: outcomes of patients with stable high-risk coronary artery disease receiving medical-preceding therapy in Japan.

BACKGROUND Stable coronary artery disease (CAD) is classified into 2 types: high-risk (ie, 3-vessel disease, left main trunk lesions, or ostial lesions of the left anterior descending (LAD)) and low-risk (1- or 2-vessel disease other than ostial lesions of the LAD). Generally, the former is treated with coronary artery bypass grafting-preceding therapy (CABG), but not medical-preceding therapy (Medical); however, this is based on evidence from 30 years ago or more and does not reflect the recent progression of Medical and CABG. In addition, a randomized study has not been performed in Japan. METHODS AND RESULTS In high-risk CAD, the long-term outcomes of 77 Medical patients and age-, sex-, coronary-lesion-, symptom- and risk-factor-matched 99 CABG patients were surveyed over 3 years (mean: 3.4 years) starting in 2000 at 37 nationwide hospitals. The incidences of cardiac death and cardiac death+non-fatal acute coronary syndrome (9.1% and 11.7% in Medical, and 2.0% and 3.0% in CABG, respectively) were significantly higher and the improvement in clinical symptoms was significantly lower in Medical than CABG. CONCLUSIONS CABG is recommended in patients with high-risk CAD from the view of long-term prognosis; however, it should be remembered that the long-term outcome in Medical has considerably improved.

[1]  Cass Principal Investigators and Their Associates Coronary artery surgery study (CASS): a randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Comparability of entry characteristics and survival in randomized patients and nonrandomized patients meeting randomization criteria. , 1984, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Conservative Therapy in Nonacute Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis , 2005, Circulation.

[3]  K. Nishigaki,et al.  Assessment of Coronary Intervention in Japan From the Japanese Coronary Intervention Study (JCIS) Group : Comparison Between 1997 and 2000 , 2004 .

[4]  W. Peart,et al.  A university hospital. , 1970, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[5]  K. Nishigaki,et al.  Outcomes of patients with stable low-risk coronary artery disease receiving medical- and PCI-preceding therapies in Japan: J-SAP study 1-1. , 2006, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[6]  E. Varnauskas Survival, myocardial infarction, and employment status in a prospective randomized study of coronary bypass surgery. , 1985, Circulation.

[7]  Y. Tomizawa,et al.  Survival Benefit of Exclusive Use of In Situ Arterial Conduits Over Combined Use of Arterial and Vein Grafts for Multiple Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting , 2005, Circulation.

[8]  P. Peduzzi,et al.  Long-term mortality and morbidity results of the Veterans Administration randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. , 1985, Circulation.

[9]  J. Légaré,et al.  Composite arterial grafts versus conventional grafting for coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2004, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[10]  Sankey V. Williams,et al.  ACC/AHA/ACP-ASIM guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: executive summary and recommendations. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients with Chronic Stable Angina). , 1999, Circulation.

[11]  Lippincott Williams Wilkins,et al.  Coronary artery surgery study (CASS): a randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Survival data. , 1983, Circulation.