A Decision Model for Data Sharing

Data-driven innovation has great potential for the development of innovative services that not only have economic value, but that help to address societal challenges. Many of these challenges can only be addressed by data sharing of public and privately owned data. These public-private data sharing collaborations require data governance rules. Data governance can address many barriers, for example by deploying a decision model to guide choices regarding data sharing resulting in interventions supported by a data sharing platform. Based on a literature review of data governance and three use cases for data sharing in the logistics sector, we have developed a data sharing decision model from the perspective of a data provider. The decision model addresses technical as well as ownership, privacy, and economical barriers to sharing publicly and privately owned data and subsequently proposes interventions to address these barriers. We found that the decision model is useful for identifying and addressing data sharing barriers as it is applicable to amongst others privacy and commercial sensitive data.

[1]  Frank Bannister,et al.  Barriers to open data release: A view from the top , 2014, Inf. Polity.

[2]  J. Manyika Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity , 2011 .

[3]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Creating Open Government Ecosystems: A Research and Development Agenda , 2012, Future Internet.

[4]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[5]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Participation and Data Quality in Open Data use: Open Data Infrastructures Evaluated , 2015, ECEG 2015.

[6]  Rhoda C. Joseph,et al.  Big Data and Transformational Government , 2013, IT Professional.

[7]  Katleen Janssen,et al.  The influence of the PSI directive on open government data: An overview of recent developments , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[8]  Carlo Batini,et al.  Data Quality: Concepts, Methodologies and Techniques , 2006, Data-Centric Systems and Applications.

[9]  Tom Heath,et al.  Open Data Commons, a License for Open Data , 2008, LDOW.

[10]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Doing interpretive research , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Tim Berners-Lee,et al.  Linked Data - The Story So Far , 2009, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[12]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[13]  T. P. Bakker,et al.  Thriving and surviving in a data-driven society , 2013 .

[14]  Robert J. Connor,et al.  Data challenges and opportunities , 2014 .

[15]  P. Weill,et al.  IT Governance , 2017 .

[16]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Transparency and technological change: Ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[17]  Niels Bjørn-Andersen,et al.  Generating Value from Open Government Data , 2013, ICIS.

[18]  Wout Hofman,et al.  A global IT infrastructure improving container security by data completion , 2012 .

[19]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Special Issue on Innovation through Open Data - A Review of the State-of-the-Art and an Emerging Research Agenda: Guest Editors' Introduction , 2014, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[20]  John Mingers,et al.  Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government , 2012, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[22]  Boris Otto,et al.  One Size Does Not Fit All---A Contingency Approach to Data Governance , 2009, JDIQ.

[23]  Tim Berners-Lee,et al.  Linked data , 2020, Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist.