System Design Through Subsystem Selection Using Physical Programming

Thedesign ofcomplex systemscan involvethe selection of several subsystem designs. Weinvestigatetheproblem of selecting discrete concepts from multiple, coupled subsystems. This problem is one where measures of merit for both subsystem (local) and system (global) levels are present. An approach is developed to obtain the sets of preferred subsystem design concepts. Graph theory is used to represent the coupled selection problem where the nodes of the graph are the subsystem design choices and the arcs connecting the nodes indicate the relationships between the subsystems. Optimization techniques from graph theory and physical programming are combined to form an approach to model and solve this problem. This approach can be used to identify a given number of successful, or feasible, subsystem combinations that represent design alternatives. Once the promising subsystem designs are obtained at the conceptual design stage, focus can be restricted to these chosen design alternatives for further testing and ree nement at a later embodiment design stage. Although the examples presented in this paper involve conceptual design, the presented approach can be used with any coupled discrete selection problem.

[1]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Interactive physical programming : Tradeoff analysis and decision making in multicriteria optimization , 2000 .

[2]  Wayne L. Winston.  Introduction to Mathematical Programming: Applications and Algorithms , 1990 .

[3]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  Foraging-directed Adaptive Linear Programming (FALP): A hybrid algorithm for discrete/continuous design problems , 1999 .

[4]  Achille Messac,et al.  From Dubious Construction of Objective Functions to the Application of Physical Programming , 2000 .

[5]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[6]  A. Messac,et al.  Mathematical and Pragmatic Perspectives of Physical Programming , 2001 .

[7]  Achille Messac,et al.  From the dubious art of constructing objective functions to the application of physical programming , 1996 .

[8]  S. N. Kramer,et al.  An Augmented Lagrange Multiplier Based Method for Mixed Integer Discrete Continuous Optimization and Its Applications to Mechanical Design , 1994 .

[9]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  A hierarchical evaluation process for multiple attribute design selection with uncertainty , 1993 .

[10]  E. Sandgren,et al.  Nonlinear Integer and Discrete Programming in Mechanical Design Optimization , 1990 .

[11]  Leonard Bridgeman,et al.  Jane's All the World's Aircraft , 1970 .

[12]  Daniel P. Raymer,et al.  Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach , 1989 .

[13]  Achille Messac,et al.  Physical programming - Effective optimization for computational design , 1996 .

[14]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  Conceptual design of a complex engineering system through coupled selection , 1998 .

[15]  G. Hazelrigg.  Systems Engineering: An Approach to Information-Based Design , 1996 .

[16]  Chun Zhang,et al.  ON MIXED-DISCRETE NONLINEAR OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY , 1995 .

[17]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  Multiattribute decision making using hypothetical equivalents , 2002, DAC 2002.

[18]  David W. Rosen,et al.  On combinatorial design spaces for the configuration design of product families , 2001, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.