Measuring information content from observations for data assimilation: relative entropy versus shannon entropy difference

ABSTRACT The relative entropy is compared with the previously used Shannon entropy difference as a measure of the amount of information extracted from observations by an optimal analysis in terms of the changes in the probability density function (pdf) produced by the analysis with respect to the background pdf. It is shown that the relative entropy measures both the signal and dispersion parts of the information content from observations, while the Shannon entropy difference measures only the dispersion part. When the pdfs are Gaussian or transformed to Gaussian, the signal part of the information content is given by a weighted inner-product of the analysis increment vector and the dispersion part is given by a non-negative definite function of the analysis and background covariance matrices. When the observation space is transformed based on the singular value decomposition of the scaled observation operator, the information content becomes separable between components associated with different singular values. Densely distributed observations can be then compressed with minimum information loss by truncating the components associate with the smallest singular values. The differences between the relative entropy and Shannon entropy difference in measuring information content and information loss are analysed in details and illustrated by examples.

[1]  C.E. Shannon,et al.  Communication in the Presence of Noise , 1949, Proceedings of the IRE.

[2]  Pengfei Zhang,et al.  Identifying Doppler Velocity Contamination Caused by Migrating Birds. Part I: Feature Extraction and Quantification , 2005 .

[3]  Andrew J. Majda,et al.  Predictability in a Model of Geophysical Turbulence , 2005 .

[4]  J. R. Eyre,et al.  The information content of data from satellite sounding systems: A simulation study , 1990 .

[5]  R. Kleeman Measuring Dynamical Prediction Utility Using Relative Entropy , 2002 .

[6]  R. Hodur The Naval Research Laboratory’s Coupled Ocean/Atmosphere Mesoscale Prediction System (COAMPS) , 1997 .

[7]  N. Roberts,et al.  Numerical aspects of the application of recursive filters to variational statistical analysis with spatially inhomogeneous covariance , 2001 .

[8]  M. Xue Analysis and Impact of Super-obbed Doppler Radial Velocity in the NCEP Grid-point Statistical Interpolation (GSI) Analysis System , 2005 .

[9]  J. Whitaker,et al.  Ensemble Data Assimilation without Perturbed Observations , 2002 .

[10]  Ming Xue,et al.  Background error covariance functions for vector wind analyses using Doppler‐radar radial‐velocity observations , 2006 .

[11]  G. Peckham The information content of remote measurements of atmospheric temperature by satellite infra‐red radiometry and optimum radiometer configurations , 1974 .

[12]  Andrew J. Majda,et al.  A mathematical framework for quantifying predictability through relative entropy , 2002 .

[13]  Pengfei Zhang,et al.  Identifying Doppler velocity contamination caused by migrating birds. Part II: Bayes identification and probability tests , 2005 .

[14]  R. Purser,et al.  Three-Dimensional Variational Analysis with Spatially Inhomogeneous Covariances , 2002 .

[15]  Progress in Doppler radar data assimilation , 2005 .

[16]  H. L. Huang,et al.  Objective measures of the information density of satellite data , 1996 .

[17]  P. Houtekamer,et al.  A Sequential Ensemble Kalman Filter for Atmospheric Data Assimilation , 2001 .

[18]  R. Daley Atmospheric Data Analysis , 1991 .

[19]  M. Kendall,et al.  Kendall's advanced theory of statistics , 1995 .

[20]  Li Wei,et al.  An innovation method for estimating radar radial‐velocity observation error and background wind error covariances , 2007 .

[21]  Andrew J. Majda,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamics and Statistical Theories for Basic Geophysical Flows , 2006 .

[22]  John G. Proakis,et al.  Probability, random variables and stochastic processes , 1985, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[23]  Andrew F. Bennett,et al.  Inverse Methods in Physical Oceanography: Frontmatter , 1992 .

[24]  R. Purser,et al.  Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service National Centers for Environmental Prediction 5200 Auth Road Camp Springs , MD 20746-4304 Office Note 430 METEOROLOGICAL OBSERVATIONAL DATA COMPRESSION ; AN ALTERNATIVE TO CONVENTIONAL " SUPER-OBBING " , 2022 .

[25]  D. Zrnic,et al.  Doppler Radar and Weather Observations , 1984 .

[26]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 2b: Bayesian Inference. , 1996 .

[27]  Andrew J. Majda,et al.  Quantifying predictability through information theory: small sample estimation in a non-Gaussian framework , 2005 .

[28]  Qin Xu,et al.  A Three-Step Dealiasing Method for Doppler Velocity Data Quality Control , 2003 .

[29]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Constructing Three-Dimensional Multiple-Radar Reflectivity Mosaics: Examples of Convective Storms and Stratiform Rain Echoes , 2005 .