Mating periodicity and post-mating refractory period in the zoophytophagous plant bug Macrolophus caliginosus (Heteroptera: Miridae)

The zoophytophagous mirid bug Macrolophus caliginosus is an important biocontrol agent of whiteflies in the Mediterra- nean region. Periods of low productivity in commercial breeding units and unsuccessful establishment in greenhouses prompted this study of mating behaviour. Here we describe copulation behaviour, the diel mating periodicity and post-copulatory refractory period. A natural plant substrate needs to be provided if one wants to observe the copulatory behaviour of M. caliginosus in the laboratory. There was no apparent directional orientation in the approach of the two sexes, instead males pursued females after "accidentally" contacting them. Males mounted females from above, very rapidly, and without any obvious courtship behaviour, and copulation duration was very consistent (286.33 ± 4.23 s, mean ± SE). Observations over a 24-h period showed that mating was most frequent in the 8-h scotophase and first half of the 16-h photophase than in the second half of the photophase. Mated females became strongly unreceptive to new male mounting attempts, shaking their abdomen and leaving the plant if harassed. To determine the duration of the post-mating refractory period mating receptivity of females that had mated 1 or 2 weeks earlier was compared with that of virgin females of similar age. Mated females remained unreceptive even 2 weeks after mating, whereas half of the virgin females of equiva- lent age mated. Mated females were more likely to abandon a plant than virgin females when harassed by a male. Most males remated a few minutes after mating for the first time. M. caliginosus is atypical among mirids in that females apparently mate only once.

[1]  T. Miyatake,et al.  Effect of oviposition substrate on female remating in Callosobruchus chinensis (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) , 2006 .

[2]  J. McNeil,et al.  Impact of male mating history on the postmating resumption of sexual receptivity and lifetime reproductive success in Choristoneura rosaceana females , 2006 .

[3]  Qiao Wang,et al.  Females Remate for Sperm Replenishment in a Seed Bug: Evidence from Offspring Viability , 2006, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[4]  J. Malausa,et al.  Etude en laboratoire des principales caracteristiques biologiques deMacrolophus caliginosus [Heteroptera: Miridae] , 1987, Entomophaga.

[5]  T. Miyatake,et al.  Heritable variation in polyandry in Callosobruchus chinensis , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  C. Castañé,et al.  Rearing the predatory bug Macrolophus caliginosus on a meat-based diet , 2005 .

[7]  J. Cross,et al.  Attraction of Male European Tarnished Plant Bug, Lygus rugulipennis to Components of the Female Sex Pheromone in the Field , 2005, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[8]  M. McMinn,et al.  Larval food source promotes cyclic seasonal variation in polyandry in the moth Lobesia botrana , 2005 .

[9]  Michael D. Jennions,et al.  Male mating history and female fecundity in the Lepidoptera: do male virgins make better partners? , 2005, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[10]  Ò. Alomar,et al.  Colonization of tomato greenhouses by the predatory mirid bugs Macrolophus caliginosus and Dicyphus tamaninii , 2004 .

[11]  J. R. Aldrich,et al.  Pheromones of Milkweed Bugs (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae) Attract Wayward Plant Bugs: Phytocoris Mirid Sex Pheromone , 2003, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[12]  J. Zanuncio,et al.  Effects of sequential mating by males on reproductive output of the stinkbug predator, Podisus nigrispinus , 2001, BioControl.

[13]  R. L. Rodríguez Possible Female Choice During Copulation in Ozophora baranowskii (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae): Female Behavior, Multiple Copulations, and Sperm Transfer , 1998, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[14]  T. V. van Beek,et al.  Mate location in the green capsid bug, Lygocoris pabulinus , 2003 .

[15]  J. Stockel,et al.  Heritable variation for female remating in Lobesia botrana, a usually monandrous moth , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  R. Albajes,et al.  Colonisation of tomato fields by predatory mirid bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) in northern Spain , 2002 .

[17]  A. G. Wheeler Biology of the plant bugs (Hemiptera: Miridae): pests, predators, opportunists. , 2001 .

[18]  A. Groot Sexual behaviour of the green capsid bug , 2000 .

[19]  J. C. van Lenteren,et al.  Integrated Pest and Disease Management in Greenhouse Crops , 2020 .

[20]  T. A. Beek,et al.  Copulation behaviour of Lygocoris pabulinus under laboratory conditions , 1998 .

[21]  H. Sugie,et al.  Attraction of Males to Females in the Rice Leaf Bug, Trigonotylus caelestialium (KIRKALDY) (Heteroptera: Miridae). , 1997 .

[22]  J. Ringo Sexual receptivity in insects. , 1996, Annual review of entomology.

[23]  J. R. Aldrich Chemical Communication in the True Bugs and Parasitoid Exploitation , 1995 .

[24]  Bérengère Constant Etude des modalités de ponte de la punaise prédatrice Macrolophus caliginosus (Heteroptera : Miridae) en vue de l'élaboration d'un support artificiel , 1994 .

[25]  J. Alcock Postinsemination Associations Between Males and Females in Insects: The Mate-Guarding Hypothesis , 1994 .

[26]  C. A. Viraktamath,et al.  Biology of the Sorghum Earhead Bug, Calocoris Angustatus (Hemiptera: Miridae) with Description of Various Stages , 1992 .

[27]  J. Borden,et al.  FECUNDITY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE MULLEIN BUG, CAMPYLOMMA VERBASCI (MEYER) (HETEROPTERA: MIRIDAE) , 1991 .

[28]  J. Borden,et al.  EVIDENCE FOR A SEX PHEROMONE IN THE MULLEIN BUG, CAMPYLOMMA VERBASCI (MEYER) (HETEROPTERA: MIRIDAE) , 1989, The Canadian Entomologist.

[29]  M. Ridley MATING FREQUENCY AND FECUNDITY IN INSECTS , 1988 .

[30]  J. R. Aldrich Chemical Ecology of the Heteroptera , 1988 .

[31]  T. Nishida,et al.  Observations on Some Aspects of the Biology of Cyrtorhinus lividipennis Reuter (Heteroptera: Miridae) , 1985 .

[32]  William J. Bell,et al.  Chemical Ecology of Insects , 1985, Springer US.

[33]  R. Thornhill,et al.  The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems , 1983 .

[34]  N. Stork The structure and function of the adhesive organs on the antennae of male Harpocera thoracica (Fallen) (Miridae; Hemiptera) , 1981 .

[35]  Philip N. Lehner,et al.  Handbook of ethological methods , 1979 .

[36]  F. Strong,et al.  Reproductive biology of Lygus hesperus Knight: I. Laboratory studies on lygus reproduction , 1970 .

[37]  F. Strong,et al.  Reproductive biology of Lygus hesperus Knight: II. Biology of the lygus bug sex pheromone , 1970 .