Evidence that fin whales respond to the geomagnetic field during migration.

We challenge the hypothesis that fin whales use a magnetic sense to guide migration by testing for associations between geophysical parameters and the positions where fin whales were observed over the continental shelf off the northeastern United States. Monte Carlo simulations estimated the probability that the distribution of fin whale sighting was random with respect to bottom depth, bottom slope and the intensity and gradient of the geomagnetic field. The simulations demonstrated no overall association of sighting positions with any of these four geophysical parameters. Analysis of the data by season, however, demonstrated statistically reliable associations of sighting positions with areas of low geomagnetic intensity and gradient in winter and fall, respectively, but no association of sighting positions with bathymetric parameters in any season. An attempt to focus on migrating animals by excluding those observed feeding confirmed the associations of sighting positions with low geomagnetic intensity and gradient in winter and fall, respectively, and revealed additional associations with low geomagnetic gradients in winter and spring. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that fin whales, and perhaps other mysticete species, possess a magnetic sense that they use to guide migration.

[1]  A. Kalmijn,et al.  Biophysics of geomagnetic field detection , 1981 .

[2]  E. Yorke.  Sensitivity of pigeons to small magnetic field variations. , 1981, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  W. Keeton,et al.  Magnets interfere with pigeon homing. , 1971, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  C. Walcott,et al.  Anomalies in the Earth’s Magnetic Field Increase the Scatter of Pigeons’ Vanishing Bearings , 1978 .

[5]  Michael M. Walker,et al.  Short Cummunication: Honeybees can be Trained to Respond to very Small Changes in Geomagnetic Field Intensity , 1989 .

[6]  Michael M. Walker,et al.  Short Communication Attached Magnets Impair Magnetic Field Discrimination by Honeybees , 1989 .

[7]  W. Wiltschko.  The influence of magnetic total intensity and inclination on directions preferred by migrating European robins (Erithacus rubecula) , 1972 .

[8]  William T. Keeton,et al.  Effects of magnets on pigeon homing , 1972 .

[9]  J. L. Gould,et al.  Biogenic magnetite as a basis for magnetic field detection in animals. , 1981, Bio Systems.

[10]  Durward D. Skiles,et al.  The Geomagnetic Field Its Nature, History, and Biological Relevance , 1985 .

[11]  H. Wiegand.  Pielou, E. C. An introduction to mathematical ecology. Wiley Interscience. John Wiley & Sons, New York 1969. VIII + 286 S., 32 Abb., Preis 140 s , 1971 .

[12]  Michael M. Walker,et al.  Failure of stationary but not of flying honeybees (Apis mellifera) to respond to magnetic field stimuli. , 1989 .

[13]  E. C. Pielou,et al.  An introduction to mathematical ecology , 1970 .

[14]  J. Magnuson,et al.  Temperature Discrimination by Captive Free‐Swimming Tuna, Euthynnus affinis , 1976 .

[15]  Stephen T. Emlen,et al.  Chapter 3 – MIGRATION: ORIENTATION AND NAVIGATION , 1975 .

[16]  R. Kenney,et al.  Cetacean high-use habitats of the northeast United States continental shelf , 1986 .

[17]  W. L. Goodman,et al.  An Introduction to the Use of SQUID Magnetometers in Biomagnetism , 1985 .

[18]  Joseph L. Kirschvink,et al.  Geomagnetic Sensitivity in Cetaceans: An Update With Live Stranding Records in the United States , 1990 .

[19]  C. Walcott,et al.  Orientation of Homing Pigeons Altered by a Change in the Direction of an Applied Magnetic Field , 1974, Science.

[20]  Joseph L. Kirschvink,et al.  Particle-Size Considerations for Magnetite-Based Magnetoreceptors , 1985 .

[21]  B. B. Parrish.  Fish Migration , 1968, Nature.