Awareness of greater numbers of ecosystem services affects preferences for floodplain management

Abstract People’s preferences for different habitat management scenarios determine the way that floodplain habitats are managed, and the ecosystem services that they provide. Making people aware of a greater number of ecosystem services may encourage them to design habitat management that better balances the provision of conflicting services. To investigate the impacts of ecosystem service information on people’s preferences for floodplain habitat management options, we manipulated the number of ecosystem services that participants knew about, and the level of detail of the information they were provided with. The preferences of participants differed depending on the number of services that were described. Providing people with ecosystem service information had a quantifiable effect on their preferences among different habitat management options, and increased the variability in preferences between people. These findings are consistent with the theory that ecosystem service information should encourage people to consider a wider range of benefits that nature provides, and this in turn may enable habitat management that better balances trade-offs between different services. Simply describing more ecosystem services to people had no effect on their preferences for management options, suggesting that detailed, empirical data on ecosystem services are required to affect decision making.

[1]  Tim Hess,et al.  A framework for the assessment of ecosystem goods and services; a case study on lowland floodplains in England , 2010 .

[2]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[3]  D. Gilvear,et al.  River restoration in the UK: Meeting the dual needs of the European union water framework directive and flood defence? , 2007 .

[4]  A. Green,et al.  Ecosystem services provided by waterbirds , 2014, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[5]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Ecological Thresholds: The Key to Successful Environmental Management or an Important Concept with No Practical Application? , 2006, Ecosystems.

[6]  Manasi Kumar,et al.  Valuation of the ecosystem services: A psycho-cultural perspective , 2008 .

[7]  Stephen Polasky,et al.  Mapping and Valuing Ecosystem Services as an Approach for Conservation and Natural‐Resource Management , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[8]  K. Craik An ecological perspective on environmental decision-making , 1972 .

[9]  Craig W. Thomas,et al.  What Do We Know and Need to Know about the Environmental Outcomes of Collaborative Management , 2006 .

[10]  Malte Busch,et al.  Potentials of quantitative and qualitative approaches to assessing ecosystem services , 2012 .

[11]  D. Waldman,et al.  Estimating the benefits and costs to mountain bikers of changes in trail characteristics, access fees, and site closures: choice experiments and benefits transfer. , 2002, Journal of environmental management.

[12]  J. March Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice , 1978 .

[13]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Richard M. Cowling,et al.  Let's Get Serious About Human Behavior and Conservation , 2014 .

[15]  Y. Laurans,et al.  Ecosystem services economic valuation, decision-support system or advocacy? , 2014 .

[16]  T. Marsh,et al.  A hydrological overview of the summer 2007 floods in England and Wales , 2008 .

[17]  André de Palma,et al.  Rational Choice under an Imperfect Ability to Choose , 1994 .

[18]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[19]  M. Usher,et al.  Birds on reserves: the influence of area and habitat on species richness , 1985 .

[20]  European water voles in a reconnected lowland river floodplain: habitat preferences and distribution patterns following the restoration of flooding , 2014, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[21]  P. Legendre,et al.  vegan : Community Ecology Package. R package version 1.8-5 , 2007 .

[22]  Jeffrey E. Herrick,et al.  Managing low-output agroecosystems sustainably: the importance of ecological thresholds , 1999 .

[23]  The common property issue in flood control through land use in France , 2017 .

[24]  Jung Ho Lee,et al.  Optimal location of basin-wide constructed washlands to reduce risk of flooding , 2014 .

[25]  Robert Fish,et al.  Environmental decision making and an ecosystems approach , 2011 .

[26]  J. Morris,et al.  Synergies and trade-offs in the management of lowland rural floodplains: an ecosystem services approach , 2011 .

[27]  N. Malhotra Information Load and Consumer Decision Making , 1982 .

[28]  J. R. DeShazo,et al.  Designing Choice Sets for Stated Preference Methods: The Effects of Complexity on Choice Consistency , 2002 .

[29]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  Group Composition and Decision Making: How Member Familiarity and Information Distribution Affect Process and Performance , 1996 .

[30]  Y. Laurans,et al.  Use of ecosystem services economic valuation for decision making: questioning a literature blindspot. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[31]  W. Thissen,et al.  Rationality in decision- and policy-making: implications for strategic environmental assessment , 2000 .

[32]  R. Costanza Social Goals and the Valuation of Ecosystem Services , 2000, Ecosystems.

[33]  M. Hostetler,et al.  Urban lakes and waterbirds: effects of shoreline development on avian distribution , 2004 .

[34]  K. Tockner,et al.  Riverine flood plains: present state and future trends , 2002, Environmental Conservation.

[35]  P. Winkler,et al.  Quantifying ecosystem service trade-offs: the case of an urban floodplain in Vienna, Austria. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[36]  J. F. M. Duque,et al.  Land transformation by humans: A review , 2012 .

[37]  Jonathan Aldred,et al.  Existence Value, Welfare and Altruism , 1994 .

[38]  Gerald J. Bakus,et al.  Decision making: With applications for environmental management , 1982 .

[39]  J. Morris,et al.  Watery land: the management of lowland floodplains in England , 2009 .

[40]  Bruce Tonn,et al.  A Framework for Understanding and Improving Environmental Decision Making , 2000 .

[41]  Ekin Birol,et al.  Using choice experiments to design wetland management programmes: The case of Severn Estuary Wetland, UK , 2007 .

[42]  Economic benefits of standing forests in highland areas of Borneo: quantification and policy impacts , 2009 .

[43]  J. Morris,et al.  The impact of seasonal flooding on agriculture: the spring 2012 floods in Somerset, England , 2014 .

[44]  Anil Graves,et al.  Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[45]  G. Daily,et al.  Notes from the field: Lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions , 2015 .

[46]  R. Feenstra,et al.  Estimating the Benefits and Costs of New and Disappearing Products , 2017 .

[47]  Eugene S. Edgington,et al.  Randomization Tests , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[48]  A. Tversky,et al.  Rational choice and the framing of decisions , 1990 .

[49]  M. Reed Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review , 2008 .

[50]  Kathleen Hogan,et al.  Small Groups' Ecological Reasoning While Making an Environmental Management Decision. , 2002 .

[51]  Edward Maltby,et al.  Functional Assessment of Wetlands: Towards Evaluation of Ecosystem Services , 2009 .

[52]  S. Karau,et al.  Group Decision Making: The Effects of Initial Preferences and Time Pressure , 1999 .

[53]  Keming Yang Making Sense of Statistical Methods in Social Research , 2010 .

[54]  Adrienne Grêt-Regamey,et al.  Linking GIS-based models to value ecosystem services in an Alpine region. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[55]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .