Auditory temporal resolution and open speech recognition in cochlear implant recipients.

The recognition of speech events depends, among other factors, on the resolution function. The present study was conducted to evaluate the auditory temporal resolution function in cochlear implant (CI) subjects by a gap detection threshold (GDT) test. Fourteen postlingual deaf subjects who used the Nucleus 22 Channel CI system participated in the study. They were divided into two subgroups: (1) six patients who did not achieve a significant open speech recognition score; and (2) eight patients who obtained different levels of open speech recognition ability (OSRA). Gap detection thresholds were found for six noise burst durations: 85, 65, 52, 36, 25 and 10 msec. Absolute values of GDT in the CI group were longer compared with those obtained from normal-hearing subjects. The CI values varied in consistence with burst duration; namely, as burst duration decreased, GD increased. This trend was found in CI recipients with OSRA only. Examination of the relationship between GDT and OSRA indicated that the majority of CI recipients who had OSRA showed lower GDT.

[1]  Q Summerfield,et al.  Psychoacoustic and phonetic temporal processing in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  R. J. Irwin,et al.  Temporal acuity in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1981, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[3]  S. Waltzman,et al.  Performance of cochlear implant patients as a function of time. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[4]  C Muchnik,et al.  Minimal time interval in auditory temporal resolution. , 1985, The Journal of auditory research.

[5]  R. Tyler,et al.  Temporal-gap detection by cochlear prosthesis users. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[6]  R. Tyler,et al.  Intensity operating range measures as predictors of word-recognition ability in cochlear implant subjects. , 1990, Scandinavian audiology.

[7]  M. Pelizzone,et al.  Indication of a Relation between Speech Perception and Temporal Resolution for Cochlear Implantees , 1991, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[8]  B C Moore,et al.  Gap detection with sinusoids and noise in normal, impaired, and electrically stimulated ears. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  The effect of marker variability on the discrimination of temporal intervals , 1976 .

[10]  Kiyoshi Honda,et al.  Factors Contributing to Phoneme Recognition Ability of Users of the 22-Channel Cochlear Implant System , 1992, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[11]  F K Kuk,et al.  Performance of some of the better cochlear-implant patients. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[12]  R V Shannon,et al.  Detection of gaps in sinusoids and pulse trains by patients with cochlear implants. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Dianne Mecklenburg,et al.  An Overview of the Nucleus Cochlear Implant Program , 1985 .