Learning faces from variability

There are large behavioural differences in the perception of familiar and unfamiliar faces. However, little is known about face learning - how faces make the transition from unfamiliar to familiar. Most experimental work on this topic examines the effects of study time, and systematic variation of exposure (changes in pose etc). We have argued that a critical component of face learning is within-person variability - i.e. exposure to the range of naturally-occurring variations which are idiosyncratic for a particular face. Here, we present two experiments which manipulate the degree of variability to which viewers are exposed during face learning. Participants learned name and face associations for twenty unfamiliar identities presented with high and low within-person variability. Stimuli were ambient images, showing faces 'in the wild'. We show more accurate performance on a speeded name verification task for identities learned in high compared to low variability. We go on to show that exposure to high variability across just two images improves performance on a face matching task. The results demonstrate the critical role of variability in face learning. Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2015.

[1]  Rob Jenkins,et al.  Arguments Against a Configural Processing Account of Familiar Face Recognition , 2015, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[2]  Ahmed M. Megreya,et al.  Hits and false positives in face matching: A familiarity-based dissociation , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  V. Bruce Changing faces: visual and non-visual coding processes in face recognition. , 1982, British journal of psychology.

[4]  Alberta Ipser,et al.  Exemplar Variance Supports Robust Learning of Facial Identity , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Ahmed M. Megreya,et al.  Unfamiliar faces are not faces: Evidence from a matching task , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[6]  John R. Vokey,et al.  Changing photos of faces: effects of exposure duration and photo similarity on recognition and the accuracy−confidence relationship , 1990 .

[7]  A. Burton,et al.  Passport Officers’ Errors in Face Matching , 2014, PloS one.

[8]  F. Fang,et al.  Learning to discriminate face views. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Roy S. Malpass,et al.  Race, arousal, attention, exposure and delay: An examination of factors moderating face recognition. , 2001 .

[10]  S. Penrod,et al.  Meta-analysis of facial identification studies. , 1986 .

[11]  W. L. Braje Illumination encoding in face recognition: effect of position shift. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[12]  A. Burton,et al.  Redesigning photo-ID to improve unfamiliar face matching performance. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[13]  Ahmed M Megreya,et al.  Matching faces to photographs: poor performance in eyewitness memory (without the memory). , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[14]  Allison B. Sekuler,et al.  Perceptual learning modifies inversion effects for faces and textures , 2009, Vision Research.

[15]  G. Pike,et al.  When Seeing should not be Believing: Photographs, Credit Cards and Fraud , 1997 .

[16]  V. Bruce,et al.  Face Recognition in Poor-Quality Video: Evidence From Security Surveillance , 1999 .

[17]  A. Burton,et al.  Mental representations of familiar faces. , 2011, British journal of psychology.

[18]  A. Mike Burton,et al.  Why has research in face recognition progressed so slowly? The importance of variability , 2013, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  V. Bruce,et al.  Recognition of unfamiliar faces , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  Frances L. Krouse Effects of pose, pose change, and delay on face recognition performance. , 1981 .

[21]  R. Johnston,et al.  Exploring Levels of Face Familiarity by Using an Indirect Face-Matching Measure , 2002, Perception.

[22]  M. Fahle Perceptual learning: specificity versus generalization , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[23]  Jie Sui,et al.  Transfer between pose and illumination training in face recognition. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  Kathy Pezdek,et al.  Face recognition memory: The effects of exposure duration and encoding instruction , 1992 .

[25]  R. Johnston,et al.  Matching as an index of face familiarity , 2004 .

[26]  Andrew W. Young,et al.  Social inferences from faces: Ambient images generate a three-dimensional model , 2013, Cognition.

[27]  Andrew W Young,et al.  Learning faces from photographs. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  A. Burton,et al.  Variability in photos of the same face , 2011, Cognition.

[29]  David White,et al.  Identity-level representations affect unfamiliar face matching performance in sequential but not simultaneous tasks , 2015, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[30]  G. Hole,et al.  Effects of Geometric Distortions on Face-Recognition Performance , 2002, Perception.

[31]  V. Bruce,et al.  Matching identities of familiar and unfamiliar faces caught on CCTV images. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[32]  R. Johnston,et al.  Demonstrating how unfamiliar faces become familiar using a face matching task , 2005 .

[33]  Paul Miller,et al.  Verification of face identities from images captured on video. , 1999 .

[34]  Rob Jenkins,et al.  Identity From Variation: Representations of Faces Derived From Multiple Instances , 2016, Cogn. Sci..