Some thoughts on problems associated with various sampling media used for environmental monitoring

Modern analytical instrumentation is capable of measuring a variety of trace elements at concentrations down into the single or double digit parts-per-trillion (ng l–1) range. This holds for the three most common sample media currently used in environmental monitoring programs: filtered water, whole-water and separated suspended sediment. Unfortunately, current analytical capabilities have exceeded the current capacity to collect both uncontaminated and representative environmental samples. The success of any trace element monitoring program requires that this issue be both understood and addressed.The environmental monitoring of trace elements requires the collection of calendar- and event-based dissolved and suspended sediment samples. There are unique problems associated with the collection and chemical analyses of both types of sample media. Over the past 10 years, reported ambient dissolved trace element concentrations have declined. Generally, these decreases do not reflect better water quality, but rather improvements in the procedures used to collect, process, preserve and analyze these samples without contaminating them during these steps. Further, recent studies have shown that the currently accepted operational definition of dissolved constituents (material passing a 0.45 µm membrane filter) is inadequate owing to sampling and processing artifacts. The existence of these artifacts raises questions about the generation of accurate, precise and comparable ‘dissolved’ trace element data.Suspended sediment and associated trace elements can display marked short- and long-term spatial and temporal variability. This implies that spatially representative samples only can be obtained by generating composites using depth- and width-integrated sampling techniques. Additionally, temporal variations have led to the view that the determination of annual trace element fluxes may require nearly constant (e.g., high-frequency) sampling and subsequent chemical analyses. Ultimately, sampling frequency for flux estimates becomes dependent on the time period of concern (daily, weekly, monthly, yearly) and the amount of acceptable error associated with these estimates.

[1]  G. Benoit,et al.  Clean technique measurement of pb, ag, and cd in freshwater: a redefinition of metal pollution. , 1994, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  J. Nriagu,et al.  Dissolved Trace Metals in Lakes Superior, Erie, and Ontario , 1996 .

[3]  Arthur J. Horowitz,et al.  The effect of membrane filtration artifacts on dissolved trace element concentrations , 1992 .

[4]  Wim Salomons,et al.  Metals in the Hydrocycle. , 1983 .

[5]  Timothy L. Miller,et al.  Variations in suspended sediment and associated trace element concentrations in selected riverine cross sections , 1990 .

[6]  D. Carey.  Erosion and Sediment Transport Monitoring Programmes in River Basins , 1994 .

[7]  M. Thompson,et al.  A handbook of inductively coupled plasma spectrometry , 1983 .

[8]  Amy S. Ludtke,et al.  Data from selected U.S. Geological Survey national stream water-quality monitoring networks (WQN) on CD-ROM , 1996 .

[9]  G. Hall,et al.  Response to Comments on “Problems Associated with Using Filtration To Define Dissolved Trace Element Concentrations in Natural Water Samples” , 1996 .

[10]  Arthur J. Horowitz,et al.  Problems Associated with Using Filtration To Define Dissolved Trace Element Concentrations in Natural Water Samples , 1996 .

[11]  Professor Dr. Ulrich Förstner,et al.  Metal Pollution in the Aquatic Environment , 1979, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[12]  J. Norris,et al.  Water-quality data-collection activities in Colorado and Ohio; Phase II, Evaluation of 1984 field and laboratory quality-assurance practices , 1987 .

[13]  Arthur J. Horowitz,et al.  A Primer on Sediment-Trace Element Chemistry , 1991 .

[14]  Herbert L. Windom,et al.  Inadequacy of NASQAN data for assessing metal trends in the nation's rivers , 1991 .

[15]  J. C. Loon,et al.  Selected methods of trace metal analysis : biological and environmental samples / Jon C. Van Loon , 1985 .

[16]  Howard E. Taylor,et al.  Mississippi river methods comparison study: implications for water quality monitoring of dissolved trace elements. , 1995, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Arthur J. Horowitz,et al.  U.S. Geological Survey protocol for the collection and processing of surface-water samples for the subsequent determination of inorganic constituents in filtered water , 1994 .

[18]  Amy S. Ludtke,et al.  Data from selected U.S. Geological Survey National Stream Water Quality Monitoring Networks , 1998 .