Negative and positive congruence effects in letters and shapes

In six experiments in which a binary classification task was used, letter and nonletter (geometrical shapes, pseudoletters, or rotated letters) targets were presented either in isolation or surrounded by a geometrical shape. The surrounding shape could be congruent or incongruent with the target. When the classification required a distinction between letters and nonletters, either explicitly (Experiments 1–3) or implicitly (Experiment 4), a negative congruence effect was obtained for letters, contrasting with a regular, positive congruence effect for nonletters. When no distinction was to be made, letters and nonletters invariably showed a positive congruence effect (Experiments 5 and 6). In particular, between Experiments 1–4 and Experiments 5 and 6, the occurrence of negative or positive congruence effects for the same stimuli depended on the task. Feature interaction, target selection, and response competition explanations were tested against a feature integration approach. The results are explained in terms of different feature integration strategies for letters and nonletters.

[1]  J G Rueckl,et al.  On the locus of redundancy effects in a letter-detection task , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  A F Sanders,et al.  The Eriksen flanker effect revisited. , 2002, Acta psychologica.

[3]  O. Turnbull,et al.  Hemispheric Asymmetry for Global and Local Processing: Language Is Less Important Than One Might Think , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[4]  T W Deacon Evolutionary perspectives on language and brain plasticity. , 2000, Journal of communication disorders.

[5]  A. Kramer,et al.  Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Neural Activation During Response Competition , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  R Kimchi,et al.  The Role of Wholistic/Configural Properties versus Global Properties in Visual Form Perception , 1994, Perception.

[8]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  Visual cortical mechanisms of perceptual grouping: interacting layers, networks, columns, and maps , 2000, Neural Networks.

[9]  S. Dubé,et al.  Local and global factors of similarity in visual search , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  Terry Shikano,et al.  Divided attention and visual search for simple versus complex features , 2003, Vision Research.

[11]  John R. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and visual attention , 1985 .

[12]  M Mason,et al.  Recognition time for letters and nonletters: effects of serial position, array size, and processing order. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Goodness of pattern and pattern uncertainty. , 1963 .

[14]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[15]  L. E. Krueger,et al.  Effect of letter orientation and sequential redundancy on the speed of letter search , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[16]  T. Nazir,et al.  Lateral masking: Limitations of the feature interaction account , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  J. Rouder,et al.  Flanker and negative flanker effects in letter identification , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  Jeff F. Miller The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: A search for boundary conditions , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  H Pashler,et al.  Coordinate frame for symmetry detection and object recognition. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  L. E. Krueger The word-superiority effect: Is its locus visual-spatial or verbal? , 1975 .

[21]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Preemption effects in visual search: evidence for low-level grouping. , 1995, Psychological review.

[22]  Thomas Lachmann,et al.  Reversals in the Context of the Functional Coordination Deficit Model , 2001 .

[23]  G. M. Reicher Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[24]  Ronald G. Shapiro,et al.  Letter detection with rapid serial visual presentation: evidence against word superiority at feature extraction. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  Christine Deruelle,et al.  Positive and negative compatibility effects , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  N. Lavie Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  James R. Pomerantz,et al.  Attention and object perception. , 1989 .

[28]  Selective attention to global and local structure of objects: Alternative measures of nontarget processing , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  A. Friederici,et al.  From language to reading and reading disability: Cognitive functions and their neural basis , 2002 .

[30]  C. Leeuwen,et al.  Context influence on the perception of figures as conditional upon perceptual organization strategies , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  M. G. Eley,et al.  Identifying rotated letter-like symbols , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[32]  Elizabeth L Bjork,et al.  On the nature of input channels in visual processing. , 1977, Psychological review.

[33]  Anna Brooks,et al.  The Role of ON- and OFF-Channel Processing in the Detection of Bilateral Symmetry , 2002, Perception.

[34]  C. van Leeuwen,et al.  Visual search strategy and perceptual organization covary with individual preference and structural complexity. , 1997, Acta psychologica.

[35]  J. R. Pomerantz,et al.  Emergent features, attention, and perceptual glue in visual form perception. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  D J Mewhort,et al.  Blank characters in tachistoscopic recognition: space has both a symbolic and a sensory role. , 1982, Canadian journal of psychology.

[37]  David J. Field,et al.  Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field” , 1993, Vision Research.

[38]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[39]  S J Leat,et al.  Crowding in central and eccentric vision: the effects of contour interaction and attention. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[40]  A. van der Heijden,et al.  Target-noise separation in visual selective attention. , 1986, Acta psychologica.

[41]  J. Ridley Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions , 2001 .

[42]  William P. Banks,et al.  Visual detection accuracy and target-noise proximity , 1974 .

[43]  D. Besner,et al.  The myth of ballistic processing: Evidence from Stroop’s paradigm , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[44]  William K. Estes,et al.  Interactions of signal and background variables in visual processing , 1972 .

[45]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Basic functions of language, reading and reading disability , 2002 .

[46]  C. Leeuwen,et al.  Stroop can occur without Garner interference: Strategic and mandatory influences in multidimensional stimuli , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[47]  What has happened to Prägnanz? Coding, stability, or resonance. , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[48]  L. Paquet,et al.  Evidence for early selection: Precuing target location reduces interference from same-category distractors , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[49]  T. Lachmann Reading Disability as a Deficit in Functional Coordination , 2001 .

[50]  D. Sagi,et al.  Top-Down Modulation of Lateral Interactions in Early Vision Does Attention Affect Integration of the Whole or Just Perception of the Parts? , 2003, Current Biology.

[51]  A. Friederici,et al.  From Language to Reading and Reading Disability , 2002 .

[52]  I Kovács,et al.  A closed curve is much more than an incomplete one: effect of closure in figure-ground segmentation. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  Lester E. Kreuger Effect of irrelevant surrounding material on speed of same-different judgment of two adjacent letters. , 1973 .

[54]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[55]  van Leeuwen C,et al.  Stability and Intermittency in Large-Scale Coupled Oscillator Models for Perceptual Segmentation , 1997, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[56]  H. Egeth,et al.  Goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in cross-dimensional texture segregation , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[57]  J. Wolfe,et al.  The Psychophysical Evidence for a Binding Problem in Human Vision , 1999, Neuron.

[58]  J. Joseph,et al.  Shared and dissociated cortical regions for object and letter processing. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[59]  B Julesz,et al.  Binocular Disappearance of Monocular Symmetry , 1966, Science.

[60]  S. T. Orton WORD-BLINDNESS IN SCHOOL CHILDREN , 1925 .

[61]  J. Baron,et al.  An analysis of the word-superiority effect☆ , 1973 .

[62]  P J Keuss,et al.  Focused attention reduces the effect of lateral interference in multi-element arrays , 2001, Psychological research.

[63]  A F Kramer,et al.  Strategic effects on object-based attentional selection. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[64]  G. Kanizsa Seeing and thinking. , 1985, Acta psychologica.

[65]  L E Krueger,et al.  Effect of irrelevant surrounding material on speed of same-different judgment of two adjacent letters. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[66]  E Fox,et al.  Perceptual grouping and visual selective attention , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[67]  H. BOUMA,et al.  Interaction Effects in Parafoveal Letter Recognition , 1970, Nature.

[68]  C. Leeuwen,et al.  Scale-invariant fluctuations of the dynamical synchronization in human brain electrical activity , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[69]  G. Geiger,et al.  Visual Recognition in the Peripheral Field: Letters versus Symbols and Adults versus Children , 1993, Perception.

[70]  D. Levi,et al.  The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafovea , 1992, Vision Research.

[71]  M. Posner Chronometric explorations of mind , 1978 .

[72]  William Prinzmetal,et al.  Configurational effects in visual information processing , 1976 .

[73]  J. Duncan Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[74]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[75]  Thomas Lachmann,et al.  Letter Reversals in Dyslexia: Is the Case Really Closed? A Critical Review and Conclusions , 2003 .

[76]  P. Bigsby The visual processor module and normal adult readers. , 1988, British journal of psychology.

[77]  U. Polat,et al.  Lateral interactions between spatial channels: Suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking experiments , 1993, Vision Research.

[78]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[79]  Cees van Leeuwen,et al.  Nonlinearity in giant depolarizing potentials , 2003 .

[80]  W. Estes,et al.  Similarity-related channel interactions in visual processing. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[81]  Howard E. Egeth,et al.  Conceptual and perceptual components of interletter inhibition. , 1981 .