Retrospective analysis of photographic evaluation of burn depth.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Evaluation of burn depth is an essential and difficult step that conditions surgical or non-surgical treatment. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the opportunity to diagnose burn depth only with initial photography of the burn. METHOD For all patients admitted to our burn unit between January 2002 and March 2008, we performed a retrospective analysis of burn depth based on a photographic evaluation. Blinded photos were submitted to three experienced surgeons who were asked if the burns required a graft or not. The diagnosis done by photography evaluation was then compared to initial diagnosis and treatment. MAIN FINDINGS Out of 911 patients photography analysed, the photographic evaluation was equivalent to clinical evaluation in 76% of the cases. The sensitivity and specificity of the photographic evaluation were, respectively, 0.77 and 0.75. The main evaluation errors were in intermediate burns (29.6% of errors) and were more often due to overestimation of the depth. In 75% of cases, there was a full agreement between 3 surgeons (683/911). A secondary analysis excluding electrical and chemical injuries showed an improvement of predictability. CONCLUSION Even though a photographic analysis cannot replace clinical examination, photographic evaluation may be one option to consider for an early distance diagnosis.

[1]  A H Roberts,et al.  Burn depth and its histological measurement. , 2001, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[2]  M. Baxi,et al.  A retrospective analysis of early excision and skin grafting from 1993-1995. , 1998, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[3]  A. Papp,et al.  The progression of burn depth in experimental burns: a histological and methodological study. , 2004, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[4]  Nabil Wasif,et al.  Diabetes and burns: retrospective cohort study. , 2002, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[5]  D. McGill,et al.  Assessment of burn depth: a prospective, blinded comparison of laser Doppler imaging and videomicroscopy. , 2007, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[6]  L. Nanney,et al.  Progressive burn injury documented with vimentin immunostaining. , 1996, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[7]  A. V. Forage THE HISTORY OF THE CLASSIFICATION OF BURNS (DIAGNOSIS OF DEPTH). , 1963, British journal of plastic surgery.

[8]  D. Cass,et al.  Laser Doppler imaging prediction of burn wound outcome in children. , 2002, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[9]  D. Heimbach,et al.  The optimal time for early excision in major burn injury. , 2006, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet.

[10]  M. Mittlböck,et al.  Progression of burn wound depth by systemical application of a vasoconstrictor: an experimental study with a new rabbit model. , 1999, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[11]  J. Jeng,et al.  Repetitive Ischemia–Reperfusion Injury: A Plausible Mechanism for Documented Clinical Burn-Depth Progression After Thermal Injury , 2007, Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association.