Evaluating Pressure Swing Adsorption as a CO2 separation technique in coal-fired power plants

Abstract The paper provides with a first assessment on the suitability of Pressure Swing Adsorption (PSA) as a valid option for Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) in coal-fired power plants. A full-plant analysis of an Advanced SuperCritical (ASC) pulverized coal plant and of an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) plant, operating with a PSA unit, is presented. The systems selected aim to represent the most diffused options for coal-based power generation, respectively in a post- and pre-combustion application of CO2 separation. The definition of the PSA process is tailored for the two different scenarios considered, starting from the adsorbent selected (zeolite 5A and activated carbon, respectively for post- and pre-combustion). The objective is to investigate the competitiveness of PSA with respect to the benchmark technology for CCS, namely absorption. In order to consider the different aspects measuring the effectiveness of a CO2 separation technique, the performance of the power plants is evaluated in terms of CO2 separation performance, energy efficiency and footprint of the technology. The post-combustion scenario analysis shows that PSA can be competitive with regard to the separation and the energy performance. PSA is able to match the CO2 separation requirements, and the relative energy penalty is slightly lower than that resulting from amine-absorption. Despite that, the footprint of the PSA unit demonstrates to be way larger than that related to absorption and unlikely acceptable. PSA in the pre-combustion scenario returns more encouraging results, approaching the outcomes achieved with absorption both in terms of CO2 separation performance and plant energy efficiency. The footprint, even though significantly larger than with absorption, appears to be reasonable for actual implementation.

[1]  B. Metz IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage , 2005 .

[2]  E Gallei,et al.  Infrared spectroscopic studies of the adsorption of carbon dioxide and the coadsorption of carbon dioxide and water on CaY- and NiY-zeolites☆ , 1976 .

[3]  Douglas M. Ruthven,et al.  Principles of Adsorption and Adsorption Processes , 1984 .

[4]  Marcin Panowski,et al.  Modelling of CO2 Adsorption from Exhaust Gases , 2009 .

[5]  P. Harlick,et al.  An experimental adsorbent screening study for CO2 removal from N2 , 2004 .

[6]  Markus Haider,et al.  Optimization of CO2 compression and purification units (CO2CPU) for CCS power plants , 2012 .

[7]  Paul A. Webley,et al.  Dual mode roll-up effect in multicomponent non-isothermal adsorption processes with multilayered bed packing , 2011 .

[8]  Alírio E. Rodrigues,et al.  Bilinear Driving Force Approximation in the Modeling of a Simulated Moving Bed Using Bidisperse Adsorbents , 1999 .

[9]  Armin D. Ebner,et al.  Arithmetic approach for complex PSA cycle scheduling , 2010 .

[10]  Kee-Kahb Koo,et al.  Effect of Rinse and Recycle Methods on the Pressure Swing Adsorption Process To Recover CO2 from Power Plant Flue Gas Using Activated Carbon , 2002 .

[11]  R. T. Yang,et al.  Concentration and recovery of carbon dioxide from flue gas by pressure swing adsorption , 1993 .

[12]  R. T. Yang,et al.  Gas Separation by Adsorption Processes , 1987 .

[13]  Shigeo Uchida,et al.  Evaluation of dual-bed pressure swing adsorption for CO2 recovery from boiler exhaust gas , 2001 .

[14]  Douglas M. Ruthven,et al.  Kinetics of non‐isothermal sorption in molecular sieve crystals , 1980 .

[15]  Armin D. Ebner,et al.  State-of-the-art Adsorption and Membrane Separation Processes for Carbon Dioxide Production from Carbon Dioxide Emitting Industries , 2009 .

[16]  Soon-Haeng Cho,et al.  Performance analysis of four‐bed H2 PSA process using layered beds , 2000 .

[17]  K. Kobe The properties of gases and liquids , 1959 .

[18]  Douglas M. Ruthven,et al.  Diffusion of CO2 in 4A and 5A zeolite crystals , 1980 .

[19]  Alírio E. Rodrigues,et al.  Multi-bed Vacuum Pressure Swing Adsorption for carbon dioxide capture from flue gas , 2011 .

[20]  R. T. Yang,et al.  Bulk Gas Separation by Pressure Swing Adsorption , 1986 .

[21]  Marco Mazzotti,et al.  A parametric study of a PSA process for pre-combustion CO2 capture , 2013 .

[22]  Nabil Tlili,et al.  Carbon dioxide capture and recovery by means of TSA and/or VSA , 2009 .

[23]  Ennio Macchi,et al.  Integration of SEWGS for carbon capture in Natural Gas Combined Cycle. Part B: Reference case comparison , 2011 .

[24]  Tatsuo Kabata,et al.  Technology for removing carbon dioxide from power plant flue gas by the physical adsorption method , 1996 .

[25]  R. J. Holmes,et al.  An examination of how exposure to humid air can result in changes in the adsorption properties of activated carbons , 1988 .

[26]  R. Reid,et al.  The Properties of Gases and Liquids , 1977 .

[27]  R. T. Yang,et al.  Comparison of Activated Carbon and Zeolite 13X for CO2 Recovery from Flue-Gas by Pressure Swing Adsorption , 1995 .

[28]  Ping Li,et al.  Adsorption and Desorption of Carbon Dioxide and Nitrogen on Zeolite 5A , 2011 .

[29]  Lorenz T. Biegler,et al.  Simulation and optimal design of multiple‐bed pressure swing adsorption systems , 2004 .

[30]  James A. Ritter,et al.  Stripping PSA cycles for CO2 recovery from flue gas at high temperature using a hydrotalcite-like adsorbent , 2006 .

[31]  Lorenz T. Biegler,et al.  Optimization of Pressure Swing Adsorption and Fractionated Vacuum Pressure Swing Adsorption Processes for CO2 Capture , 2005 .

[32]  G. Froment,et al.  Chemical Reactor Analysis and Design , 1979 .

[33]  Marta G. Plaza,et al.  Post-combustion CO2 capture with a commercial activated carbon: Comparison of different regeneration strategies , 2010 .

[34]  Dianne E. Wiley,et al.  Reducing the Cost of CO2 Capture from Flue Gases Using Pressure Swing Adsorption , 2008 .

[35]  Michael C. Georgiadis,et al.  Generic Modeling Framework for Gas Separations Using Multibed Pressure Swing Adsorption Processes , 2008 .

[36]  Alírio E. Rodrigues,et al.  Enhancing Capacity of Activated Carbons for Hydrogen Purification , 2009 .

[37]  Kee-Kahb Koo,et al.  CO2 recovery from flue gas by PSA process using activated carbon , 2001 .

[38]  J. Poston,et al.  Adsorption and Desorption of CO2 on Solid Sorbents , 2001 .

[39]  Jerry Meldon,et al.  Advanced Post-Combustion CO 2 Capture , 2009 .

[40]  Ennio Macchi,et al.  Integration of SEWGS for carbon capture in natural gas combined cycle. Part A: Thermodynamic performances , 2011 .

[41]  Olav Bolland,et al.  Power generation with CO2 capture: Technology for CO2 purification , 2009 .

[42]  Carlos A. Grande,et al.  Dual Pressure Swing Adsorption Units for Gas Separation and Purification , 2012 .

[43]  Jeffrey Raymond Hufton,et al.  Why Does the Linear Driving Force Model for Adsorption Kinetics Work? , 2000 .

[44]  Douglas M. Ruthven,et al.  The Effect of Water on the Adsorption of CO2 and C3H8 on Type X Zeolites , 2004 .

[45]  Stephen E. Zitney,et al.  A Superstructure-Based Optimal Synthesis of PSA Cycles for Post-Combustion CO2 Capture , 2009 .

[46]  Chang-Ha Lee,et al.  Adsorption dynamics of a layered bed PSA for H2 recovery from coke oven gas , 1998 .

[47]  J. Giddings,et al.  NEW METHOD FOR PREDICTION OF BINARY GAS-PHASE DIFFUSION COEFFICIENTS , 1966 .

[48]  Yeong-Koo Yeo,et al.  Optimal operation of the pressure swing adsorption (PSA) process for CO2 recovery , 2003 .

[49]  P. James The future of coal , 1982 .

[50]  William H. Green,et al.  Analysis of Adsorbent-Based Warm CO2 Capture Technology for Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Power Plants , 2014 .

[51]  Alírio E. Rodrigues,et al.  Linear driving force approximation in cyclic adsorption processes: Simple results from system dynamics based on frequency response analysis , 1998 .

[52]  Vladimiros Nikolakis,et al.  Adsorption of H2, CO2, CH4, CO, N2 and H2O in Activated Carbon and Zeolite for Hydrogen Production , 2009 .

[53]  R. Siriwardane,et al.  Adsorption of CO2 on Zeolites at Moderate Temperatures , 2005 .

[54]  Alírio E. Rodrigues,et al.  A parametric study of layered bed PSA for hydrogen purification , 2008 .

[55]  Li Zhou,et al.  Comparative studies of CO2 and CH4 sorption on activated carbon in presence of water , 2008 .

[56]  Chang-Ha Lee,et al.  Separation of Hydrogen Mixtures by a Two-Bed Pressure Swing Adsorption Process Using Zeolite 5A , 1997 .

[57]  Marco Mazzotti,et al.  Precombustion CO2 Capture by Pressure Swing Adsorption (PSA): Comparison of Laboratory PSA Experiments and Simulations , 2013 .

[58]  Cheng-Tung Chou,et al.  Carbon dioxide recovery by vacuum swing adsorption , 2004 .

[59]  Alírio E. Rodrigues,et al.  Four beds pressure swing adsorption for hydrogen purification: Case of humid feed and activated carbon beds , 2009 .

[60]  Ennio Macchi,et al.  CO2 capture in integrated gasification combined cycle with SEWGS – Part A: Thermodynamic performances , 2013 .