Environmental Impact Assessment and Management: An Underexplored Relationship

In this paper the existing body of theory is reviewed to highlight the need for further attention to be paid to the EIA/management relationship. In particular it is shown that the majority of the literature to date has concentrated on the influence of EIA leading up to and including the decision to proceed or not with the proposed action. Less attention has been paid to the extension of the influence of EIA beyond this point to inform the process of ongoing environmental management.This relationship is then explored by reference to the Western Australian EIA system. One of the strengths of this system is its focus upon the implementation and management of proposed developments. The outcome of EIA is generally an approval to proceed with the development subject to meeting a suite of environmental design and management objectives.

[1]  David P. McCaffrey,et al.  Making Bureaucracies Think: The Environmental Impact Statement Strategy of Administrative Reform. , 1986 .

[2]  Valerie Hobbs,et al.  A proposed framework and database for EIA auditing , 1990 .

[3]  IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND DEMOCRATIC POLITICS , 1988 .

[4]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources , 1986 .

[5]  Allan F. Wichelman.  Administrative agency implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969: a conceptual framework for explaining differential response , 1976 .

[6]  L. Caldwell,et al.  Science and the National Environmental Policy Act : redirecting policy through procedural reform , 1984 .

[7]  J. Boggs.  Procedural vs. substantive in the NEPA law: Cutting the Gordian knot , 1993 .

[8]  L. Caldwell,et al.  Science and the National Environmental Policy Act: Redirecting Policy through Procedural Reform , 1983 .

[9]  Leonard Ortolano,et al.  Speculations on when and why EIA is effective , 1987 .

[10]  R. Liroff.  NEPA—Where Have We Been and Where are We Going? , 1980 .

[11]  R. Andrews.  Agency responses to NEPA: a comparison and implications. [Civil Works Program of Army Corps of Engineers and Small Watersheds Program of Soil Conservation Service] , 1976 .

[12]  Valerie Hobbs,et al.  Environmental auditing: Artificial waterway developments in Western Australia , 1992 .

[13]  Leonard Ortolano,et al.  Controls on project proponents and environmental impact assessment effectiveness , 1993 .

[14]  Michel Gariepy,et al.  Toward a dual-influence system: Assessing the effects of public participation in environmental impact assessment for hydro-Quebec projects , 1991 .

[15]  Robert V. Bartlett.  Ecological Rationality: Reason and Environmental Policy , 1986 .

[16]  E. Wilson,et al.  Strategic Environmental Assessment , 1992 .

[17]  Lynton K. Caldwell,et al.  ANALYSIS-ASSESSMENT-DECISION: THE ANATOMY OF RATIONAL POLICYMAKING , 1991 .

[18]  L. Ortolano,et al.  Strategies for managing uncertainties imposed by environmental impact assessment analysis of a Kenyan river development authority , 1991 .

[19]  Christopher Wood,et al.  Predominance and independence in environmental impact assessment: The Western Australia model , 1994 .

[20]  James J. Kennedy,et al.  Legislative Confrontation of Groupthink in US Natural Resource Agencies , 1988, Environmental Conservation.

[21]  A L Brown,et al.  From Environmental Impact Assessment to Environmental Design and Planning , 1995 .

[22]  L. G. Smith,et al.  Impact Assessment and Sustainable Resource Management , 1993 .