Reduced Sensitivity to Visual Looming Inflates the Risk Posed by Speeding Vehicles When Children Try to Cross the Road

Almost all locomotor animals respond to visual looming or to discrete changes in optical size. The need to detect and process looming remains critically important for humans in everyday life. Road traffic statistics confirm that children up to 15 years old are overrepresented in pedestrian casualties. We demonstrate that, for a given pedestrian crossing time, vehicles traveling faster loom less than slower vehicles, which creates a dangerous illusion in which faster vehicles may be perceived as not approaching. Our results from perceptual tests of looming thresholds show strong developmental trends in sensitivity, such that children may not be able to detect vehicles approaching at speeds in excess of 20 mph. This creates a risk of injudicious road crossing in urban settings when traffic speeds are higher than 20 mph. The risk is exacerbated because vehicles moving faster than this speed are more likely to result in pedestrian fatalities.

[1]  D. Regan,et al.  Binocular and monocular stimuli for motion in depth: Changing-disparity and changing-size feed the same motion-in-depth stage , 1979, Vision Research.

[2]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Microcomputer-based estimation of psychophysical thresholds: The Best PEST , 1982 .

[3]  E R Hoffmann Estimation of Time to Vehicle Arrival—Effects of Age on Use of Available Visual Information , 1994, Perception.

[4]  Paul Wilkinson,et al.  Effect of 20 mph traffic speed zones on road injuries in London, 1986-2006: controlled interrupted time series analysis , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  James R. Tresilian,et al.  Increasing confidence in vergence as a cue to distance , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  John P. Wann,et al.  Perceiving Time to Collision Activates the Sensorimotor Cortex , 2005, Current Biology.

[7]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[8]  H. Ross,et al.  Optic-Flow and Cognitive Factors in Time-to-Collision Estimates , 1983, Perception.

[9]  B. Frost,et al.  Computation of different optical variables of looming objects in pigeon nucleus rotundus neurons , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  E R Hoffmann,et al.  Children's Estimates of Vehicle Approach Times , 1980, Human factors.

[11]  S. Peron,et al.  Spike frequency adaptation mediates looming stimulus selectivity in a collision-detecting neuron , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  W Schiff,et al.  Information Used in Judging Impending Collision , 1979, Perception.

[13]  R. Norton,et al.  Effect of environmental factors on risk of injury of child pedestrians by motor vehicles: a case-control study , 1995, BMJ.

[14]  V Cavallo,et al.  Visual Information and Skill Level in Time-To-Collision Estimation , 1988, Perception.