Knowledge Dynamics and Resource Efficiency in International Business Relations

Abstract Among world’s economies, the circular economy (CE) has become popular especially in the European Union and China, which opens several opportunities for sustainability leaders to gain a first-mover advantage and, consequently, to pursue organizational sustainability and growth. In spite of public policy support, since CE often requires entrepreneurial innovation among complex networks of companies, most companies are still learning how to manage knowledge dynamics at the inter-organization level. The chapter starts by defining the key characteristics of CE and identifying the peculiarities in terms of inter-firm cooperative and competitive relations, which help in delineating contributions from the green supply chain literature. The second section shows – through the discussion of term maps – how multiple- and inter-disciplinary streams of research are increasingly linked by hard (i.e., information communication technologies based) and soft (i.e., relational and organizational) aspects of knowledge management. The third section provides a discussion on key hard and soft factors that characterize four knowledge dynamics, i.e., knowledge creation, knowledge storage, knowledge transfer, and knowledge sharing that can improve the adoption and integration of circular processes within inter-organizational coopetitive strategies. Particular attention is here given to the cross-analysis of outcomes from theoretical papers, case studies, and quantitative empirical researches that contribute to shaping relations between internal and external factors that might play as predictors of a successful implementation of CE principles. Finally, the last section concludes with recommendations for improving organizational and managerial capabilities to manage inter-firm knowledge dynamics while pursuing CE objectives in international business environments. Beside this guidance for practitioners, directions for further research are suggested for each pillar of the emerging conceptual model.

[1]  C. Yeh,et al.  Trust and knowledge sharing in green supply chains , 2008 .

[2]  Francesco Testa,et al.  Environmental value chain in green SME networks: The threat of the Abilene paradox , 2014 .

[3]  Marco Frey,et al.  Life cycle thinking in sustainable supply chains: The case of rubberized asphalt pavement , 2015 .

[4]  Stephen Tallman,et al.  Resources, Transactions and Rents: Managing Value Through Interfirm Collaborative Relationships , 1998 .

[5]  Martyna Janowicz-Panjaitan,et al.  Trust, Calculation, and Interorganizational Learning of Tacit Knowledge: An Organizational Roles Perspective , 2009 .

[6]  Marco Frey,et al.  Extended producer responsibility: The impact of organizational dimensions on WEEE collection from households. , 2017, Waste management.

[7]  R. Paton,et al.  Services innovation:: Knowledge transfer and the supply chain , 2008 .

[8]  Elliot Bendoly,et al.  The Performance Effects of Complementarities Between Information Systems, Marketing, Manufacturing, and Supply Chain Processes , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Marco Frey,et al.  Environmental Management of End‐of‐Life Products: Nine Factors of Sustainability in Collaborative Networks , 2013 .

[10]  Selwyn Piramuthu,et al.  Remanufacturing with RFID item-level information: Optimization, waste reduction and quality improvement , 2013 .

[11]  Sinan Aral,et al.  I.T. Assets, Organizational Capabilities and Firm Performance: Do Resource Allocations and Organizational Differences Explain Performance Variation? , 2007 .

[12]  H. Shee,et al.  Sustainable distribution through coopetition strategy , 2015 .

[13]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  Closed - Loop Supply Chain Models with Product Remanufacturing , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[14]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[15]  Hyojin Kim,et al.  When Buyer-Driven Knowledge Transfer Activities Really Work: A Motivation-Opportunity-Ability (MOA) Perspective , 2015 .

[16]  F. Boons,et al.  Toward a research agenda for policy intervention and facilitation to enhance industrial symbiosis based on a comprehensive literature review , 2014 .

[17]  Mohanbir Sawhney,et al.  Managing and measuring relational equity in the network economy , 2002 .

[18]  V. Mabert,et al.  Special Research Focus on Supply Chain Linkages: Challenges for Design and Management in the 21st Century* , 1998 .

[19]  Rachelle C. Sampson R&D Alliances & Firm Performance: The Impact of Technological Diversity and Alliance Organization on Innovation , 2003 .

[20]  O. Shenkar,et al.  Knowledge transfer from international joint ventures to local suppliers in a developing economy , 2015 .

[21]  Robert E. Spekman,et al.  Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques , 1994 .

[22]  S. Ulgiati,et al.  A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems , 2016 .

[23]  D. Mowery,et al.  Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer , 1996 .

[24]  M. Kotabe,et al.  Gaining from vertical partnerships : Knowledge transfer, relationship duration and supplier performance improvement in the U.S. and Japanese automotive industries , 2003 .

[25]  Han Shi,et al.  Developing country experience with eco-industrial parks: a case study of the Tianjin Economic-Technological Development Area in China , 2010 .

[26]  F. Selnes,et al.  Promoting Relationship Learning , 2003 .

[27]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Knowledge management in supply chain: An empirical study from France , 2011, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Eric T. G. Wang,et al.  Interorganizational Governance Value Creation: Coordinating for Information Visibility and Flexibility in Supply Chains , 2007, Decis. Sci..

[29]  Ritu Lohtia,et al.  What constitutes a transaction-specific asset?: An examination of the dimensions and types , 1994 .

[30]  Athanasia Pouloudi,et al.  Towards an integrated approach to knowledge management: hard, soft and abstract issues , 2002 .

[31]  Maimunah Ismail,et al.  Knowledge sharing is knowledge transfer: a misconception in the literature , 2016, J. Knowl. Manag..

[32]  Sanchoy K. Das,et al.  An approach for estimating the end-of-life product disassembly effort and cost , 2000 .

[33]  A. Velenturf,et al.  Promoting Industrial Symbiosis: Using the Concept of Proximity to Explore Social Network Development , 2016 .

[34]  Matthias Finkbeiner,et al.  Organizational LCA: the new member of the LCA family—introducing the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative guidance document , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[35]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Leveraging Standard Electronic Business Interfaces to Enable Adaptive Supply Chain Partnerships , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[36]  Zuopeng Justin Zhang,et al.  The symbiosis mechanism for effective knowledge transfer , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[37]  Viet T. Dao,et al.  From green to sustainability: Information Technology and an integrated sustainability framework , 2011, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures , 2001 .

[39]  R. Klassen,et al.  Environmental management and manufacturing performance: The role of collaboration in the supply chain , 2008 .

[40]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[41]  Wei Zhou,et al.  RFID and item-level information visibility , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[42]  Yogesh Malhotra,et al.  Integrating knowledge management technologies in organizational business processes: getting real time enterprises to deliver real business performance , 2005, J. Knowl. Manag..

[43]  Ikujiro Nonaka,et al.  The knowledge-creating theory revisited: knowledge creation as a synthesizing process , 2003 .

[44]  Li Li,et al.  Managing Knowledge Transfer in Mncs: The Impact of Headquarters Control Mechanisms , 2004 .

[45]  Jao-Hong Cheng,et al.  Inter-organizational relationships and strategy quality in green supply chains — Moderated by opportunistic behavior and dysfunctional conflict , 2012 .

[46]  Varun Grover,et al.  General Perspectives on Knowledge Management: Fostering a Research Agenda , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..