Racial and age differences in colon examination surveillance following a diagnosis of colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE The purpose of this analysis is to describe factors associated with colorectal surveillance following diagnosis and treatment of nonmetastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS Subjects were identified as part of the HMO Cancer Research Network's study of colorectal cancer survivors. To be eligible for the main study, patients had to be part of the staff model components of health maintenance organizations in southeastern Michigan and Minnesota. Using computerized databases, individuals were identified who were 40 years or older with incident nonmetastatic colorectal cancer diagnosed between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2000. Using data current through 2002, we analyzed the cohort using chi-square test statistics, life tables, and Cox proportional hazards models to understand variations in posttreatment surveillance practices. Subjects were followed up from date of diagnosis to date of recurrence, death, disenrollment from the health plan, or loss to follow-up, which ever came first. We assessed factors associated with colorectal surveillance at 1, 3, and 5 years after treatment. We also included an analysis comparing those who received an exam and those who didn't regardless of exam timing. RESULTS A total of 908 patients were eligible for the main study. Of these, we excluded subjects who were not white or African American (n = 27), resulting in an analytic sample of 881 (97% of the eligible cohort). Twenty-five percent of subjects were African American, 43% were female, and 48% were aged 70 years or older. The proportion who received an exam at 1 year was 18%, at 3 years was 60%, and at 5 years was 67%. Chi-square tests showed that African Americans were statistically significantly less likely than whites to receive an exam at all three time points. The Cox proportional hazards model for examinations regardless of timing and adjusted for confounders showed that African Americans were still less likely than whites to receive an exam (hazard ratio = 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.51 to 0.75). The same trend in undersurveillance was also observed for those 80 years of age or older at diagnosis, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.39 (95% CI = 0.26 to 0.57). CONCLUSION Our data indicate that colorectal cancer survivors who are African American or aged 80 years or more at diagnosis are less likely to receive posttreatment colorectal surveillance. Whether these differences are due to system or patient level barriers needs further study.

[1]  C. Redmond,et al.  Determinants of black/white differences in colon cancer survival. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  M. Mcfall,et al.  Colonoscopic surveillance after curative colorectal resection: Results of an empirical surveillance programme , 2003, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[3]  A. Chak,et al.  Geographic and patient variation among Medicare beneficiaries in the use of follow‐up testing after surgery for nonmetastatic colorectal carcinoma , 1999, Cancer.

[4]  K. Knopf,et al.  Racial differences in the receipt of bowel surveillance following potentially curative colorectal cancer surgery. , 2003, Health services research.

[5]  W. Atkin,et al.  Surveillance guidelines after removal of colorectal adenomatous polyps , 2002, Gut.

[6]  M. Egger,et al.  Impact on survival of intensive follow up after curative resection for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  Z. Yuan,et al.  Racial disparity in the incidence and case-fatality of colorectal cancer: analysis of 329 United States counties. , 1997, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[8]  T. Ben-Menachem,et al.  Sociodemographic Differences in the Receipt of Colorectal Cancer Surveillance Care Following Treatment With Curative Intent , 2001, Medical care.

[9]  G. Samsa,et al.  Race, treatment, and survival among colorectal carcinoma patients in an equal‐access medical system , 1998, Cancer.

[10]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2005 , 2005, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[11]  W. Longo,et al.  The preoperative assessment and postoperative surveillance of patients with colon and rectal cancer. , 2002, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[12]  M. Somerfield,et al.  2000 update of American Society of Clinical Oncology colorectal cancer surveillance guidelines. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  E. Feuer,et al.  Bowel surveillance patterns after a diagnosis of colorectal cancer in Medicare beneficiaries. , 2001, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[14]  S. Hindle,et al.  Management of colorectal liver metastases , 2001, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[15]  E. Wagner,et al.  Clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with colon surveillance among patients with a history of colorectal cancer. , 2004, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[16]  B. Davidson,et al.  Management of colorectal liver metastases , 2003, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[17]  P. Engstrom NCCN COLORECTAL CANCER PRACTICE GUIDELINES , 1996 .

[18]  M. Reed,et al.  The need for targeted research into breast cancer in the elderly , 2003, The British journal of surgery.

[19]  C. Mulrow,et al.  Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. , 1997, Gastroenterology.

[20]  W T McGivney,et al.  The National Comprehensive Cancer Network , 1998, Cancer.

[21]  A. Vernava,et al.  Current follow-up strategies after resection of colon cancer , 1994, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[22]  J. Doroshow,et al.  NCCN Colorectal Cancer Practice Guidelines. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network. , 1996, Oncology.

[23]  S. Woolf,et al.  Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-Update based on new evidence. , 2003, Gastroenterology.

[24]  Björn Ohlsson,et al.  Follow-up after Colorectal Cancer Surgery , 2003, Acta oncologica.

[25]  A. Kinsella,et al.  Management strategies for colorectal liver metastases--Part I. , 1997, Surgical oncology.

[26]  L. Hutchins,et al.  Racial differences in the outcome of patients with colorectal carcinoma , 2003, Cancer.

[27]  A. Lacy,et al.  Value of postoperative surveillance after radical surgery for colorectal cancer , 1998, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[28]  M. Somerfield,et al.  Recommended colorectal cancer surveillance guidelines by the American Society of Clinical Oncology. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.