Social inequality and assortative mating: Cause or consequence?

Johnsonet al. (Behav. Genet.17:1–7, 1987) have interpreted an apparent decline in assortative mating for educational attainment in Hawaii as being a consequence of increased social mobility and increased access to higher education. Data on the educational attainments of adult twin pairs and their spouses from the Virginia twin registry are reported which give no indication of a major decline in the intensity of assortative mating. A previous study of a Norwegian population (Heathet al., Behav. Genet.15:349–369, 1985), in which an increase in equality of educational opportunity had been documented (Heathet al., Nature314:734–736, 1985), observed remarkable constancy of the marital correlation for educational attainment. There is thus little evidence that decreases in social inequality in a society lead to a decline in assortative mating.

[1]  L. Eaves,et al.  Education policy and the heritability of educational attainment , 2016, Nature.

[2]  A. Heath,et al.  No decline in assortative mating for educational level , 1985, Behavior genetics.

[3]  R. Fisher.  XV.—The Correlation between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance. , 1919, Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh.

[4]  M. Bulmer.  The biology of twinning in man , 1970 .

[5]  S. Scarr-Salapatek.  Unknowns in the IQ Equation. (Book Reviews: Environment, Heredity, and Intelligence. Compiled from the Harvard Educational Review; The IQ Argument. Race, Intelligence and Education) , 1971 .

[6]  P. Magnus,et al.  Predicting zygosity in Norwegian twin pairs born 1915–1960 , 1983, Clinical genetics.

[7]  F. Jones.  Occupational Achievement in Australia and the United States: A Comparative Path Analysis , 1971, American Journal of Sociology.

[8]  F. Ahern,et al.  Secular change in degree of assortative mating for ability? , 1980, Behavior genetics.

[9]  T Reich,et al.  Multifactorial inheritance with cultural transmission and assortative mating. I. Description and basic properties of the unitary models. , 1978, American journal of human genetics.

[10]  R. C. Johnson,et al.  Family background, cognitive ability, and personality as predictors of educational and occupational attainment. , 1983, Social biology.

[11]  Ulf Olsson,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coefficient , 1979 .

[12]  O. D. Duncan,et al.  The American Occupational Structure , 1967 .

[13]  F. Ahern,et al.  A reply to heathet al. on assortative mating for educational level , 1987, Behavior genetics.

[14]  R. Cole,et al.  Generational differences in spouse similarity in education attainment , 1983, Behavior genetics.

[15]  O. D. Duncan.  Ability and achievement. , 1968, Eugenics quarterly.

[16]  S Scarr-Salapatek,et al.  Race, social class, and IQ. , 1971, Science.

[17]  L. Eaves,et al.  Resolving the effects of phenotype and social background on mate selection , 1985, Behavior genetics.