Anatomic renal artery branch microdissection to facilitate zero-ischemia partial nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND Robot-assisted and laparoscopic partial nephrectomies (PNs) for medial tumors are technically challenging even with the hilum clamped and, until now, were impossible to perform with the hilum unclamped. OBJECTIVE Evaluate whether targeted vascular microdissection (VMD) of renal artery branches allows zero-ischemia PN to be performed even for challenging medial tumors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A prospective cohort evaluation of 44 patients with renal masses who underwent robot-assisted or laparoscopic zero-ischemia PN either with anatomic VMD (group 1; n=22) or without anatomic VMD (group 2; n=22) performed by a single surgeon from April 2010 to January 2011. INTERVENTION Zero-ischemia PN with VMD incorporates four maneuvers: (1) preoperative computed tomographic reconstruction of renal arterial branch anatomy, (2) anatomic dissection of targeted, tumor-specific tertiary or higher-order renal arterial branches, (3) neurosurgical aneurysm microsurgical bulldog clamp(s) for superselective tumor devascularization, and (4) transient, controlled reduction of blood pressure, if necessary. MEASUREMENTS Baseline, perioperative, and postoperative data were collected prospectively. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Group 1 tumors were larger (4.3 vs 2.6 cm; p=0.011), were more often hilar (41% vs 9%; p=0.09), were medial (59% and 23%; p=0.017), were closer to the hilum (1.46 vs 3.26 cm; p=0.0002), and had a lower C index score (2.1 vs 3.9; p=0.004) and higher RENAL nephrometry scores (7.7 vs 6.2; p=0.013). Despite greater complexity, no group 1 tumor required hilar clamping, and perioperative outcomes were similar to those of group 2: operating room time (4.7 and 4.1h), median blood loss (200 and 100ml), surgical margins for cancer (all negative), major complications (0% and 9%), and minor complications (18% and 14%). The median serum creatinine level was similar 2 mo postoperatively (1.2 and 1.3mg/dl). The study was limited by the relatively small sample size. CONCLUSIONS Anatomic targeted dissection and superselective control of tumor-specific renal arterial branches facilitate zero-ischemia PN. Even challenging medial and hilar tumors can be excised without hilar clamping. Global surgical renal ischemia has been eliminated for most patients undergoing PN at our institution.

[1]  Louis R Kavoussi,et al.  Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[2]  I. Gill,et al.  Halving ischemia time during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[3]  N. Shah,et al.  Reducing warm ischaemia time during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a prospective comparison of two renal closure techniques. , 2007, European urology.

[4]  Robert G Uzzo,et al.  The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[5]  Monish Aron,et al.  800 Laparoscopic partial nephrectomies: a single surgeon series. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[6]  I. Gill,et al.  Decreased complications of contemporary laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: use of a standardized reporting system. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[7]  Chao Qin,et al.  Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with segmental renal artery clamping: technique and clinical outcomes. , 2011, European urology.

[8]  I. Gill,et al.  Clinical practice. Small renal mass. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  E. Salvati,et al.  Hypotensive epidural anesthesia for total hip arthroplasty: a review. , 1996, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[10]  Inderbir S Gill,et al.  Kidney tumor location measurement using the C index method. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[11]  R. Thompson,et al.  The impact of ischemia time during open nephron sparing surgery on solitary kidneys: a multi-institutional study. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[12]  S. Donat Standards for surgical complication reporting in urologic oncology: time for a change. , 2007, Urology.

[13]  J. Boldt,et al.  THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN RETRACTED Acute phase response to nitroprusside‐induced controlled hypotension in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy , 2000, Anaesthesia.

[14]  J. Hanson,et al.  Induced hypotension with epidural/general anesthesia reduces transfusion in radical prostate surgery , 2006, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[15]  V. Campese,et al.  "Zero ischemia" partial nephrectomy: novel laparoscopic and robotic technique. , 2011, European urology.

[16]  L. Kavoussi,et al.  Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: effect of warm ischemia on serum creatinine. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[17]  Inderbir S Gill,et al.  5-Year outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[18]  G. Piccoli,et al.  Is renal warm ischemia over 30 minutes during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy possible? One-year results of a prospective study. , 2007, European urology.

[19]  Adrian F. Hernandez,et al.  C-index is associated with functional outcomes after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[20]  Guilherme Godoy,et al.  Effect of warm ischemia time during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy on early postoperative glomerular filtration rate. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[21]  Inderbir S Gill,et al.  Every minute counts when the renal hilum is clamped during partial nephrectomy. , 2010, European urology.

[22]  A. Wagner,et al.  Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: early unclamping technique. , 2011, Journal of endourology.

[23]  S. Raja,et al.  Intraoperative blood loss during radical retropubic prostatectomy: epidural versus general anesthesia. , 1995, Urology.

[24]  T. Ahlering,et al.  Controlled hypotensive anesthesia to reduce blood loss in radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. , 1983, The Journal of urology.