Detection and Trapping of Intermediate States Priming Nicotinic Receptor Channel Opening

In the course of synaptic transmission in the brain and periphery, acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) rapidly transduce a chemical signal into an electrical impulse. The speed of transduction is facilitated by rapid ACh association and dissociation, suggesting a binding site relatively non-selective for small cations. Selective transduction has been thought to originate from the ability of ACh, over that of other organic cations, to trigger the subsequent channel-opening step. However, transitions to and from the open state were shown to be similar for agonists with widely different efficacies. By studying mutant AChRs, we show here that the ultimate closed-to-open transition is agonist-independent and preceded by two primed closed states; the first primed state elicits brief openings, whereas the second elicits long-lived openings. Long-lived openings and the associated primed state are detected in the absence and presence of an agonist, and exhibit the same kinetic signatures under both conditions. By covalently locking the agonist-binding sites in the bound conformation, we find that each site initiates a priming step. Thus, a change in binding-site conformation primes the AChR for channel opening in a process that enables selective activation by ACh while maximizing the speed and efficiency of the biological response.

[1]  Marco Beato,et al.  Single-Channel Behavior of Heteromeric α1β Glycine Receptors: An Attempt to Detect a Conformational Change before the Channel Opens , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Fred J. Sigworth,et al.  Fitting and Statistical Analysis of Single-Channel Records , 1983 .

[3]  J. Steinbach,et al.  Acetylcholine receptor activation by a site‐selective ligand: nature of brief open and closed states in BC3H‐1 cells. , 1986, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  Marco Beato,et al.  Single-channel behavior of heteromeric alpha1beta glycine receptors: an attempt to detect a conformational change before the channel opens. , 2004, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[5]  G. Nolan,et al.  Production of high-titer helper-free retroviruses by transient transfection. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  M B Jackson,et al.  Single‐Channel Recording , 1998, Current protocols in neuroscience.

[7]  David Colquhoun,et al.  On the nature of partial agonism in the nicotinic receptor superfamily , 2008, Nature.

[8]  B Sakmann,et al.  Fast events in single‐channel currents activated by acetylcholine and its analogues at the frog muscle end‐plate. , 1985, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  S. Sine,et al.  An Intersubunit Trigger of Channel Gating in the Muscle Nicotinic Receptor , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  B. Sakmann,et al.  Fluctuations in the microsecond time range of the current through single acetylcholine receptor ion channels , 1981, Nature.

[11]  B. Sakmann,et al.  Single-Channel Recording , 1995, Springer US.

[12]  J. Steinbach,et al.  Activation of acetylcholine receptors on clonal mammalian BC3H‐1 cells by low concentrations of agonist. , 1986, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  F. Qin,et al.  Estimating single-channel kinetic parameters from idealized patch-clamp data containing missed events. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[14]  S. Sine,et al.  Invariant Aspartic Acid in Muscle Nicotinic Receptor Contributes Selectively to the Kinetics of Agonist Binding , 2004, The Journal of general physiology.

[15]  K. Ohno,et al.  Congenital Myasthenic Syndrome Caused by Decreased Agonist Binding Affinity Due to a Mutation in the Acetylcholine Receptor ε Subunit , 1996, Neuron.

[16]  B. Sakmann,et al.  Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches , 1981, Pflügers Archiv.

[17]  S. Sine,et al.  Activation of acetylcholine receptors on clonal mammalian BC3H‐1 cells by high concentrations of agonist. , 1986, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  Bernard Katz,et al.  Interaction at end-plate receptors between different choline derivatives , 1957, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[19]  A. Auerbach,et al.  Kinetic, Mechanistic, and Structural Aspects of Unliganded Gating of Acetylcholine Receptor Channels , 2000, The Journal of general physiology.

[20]  J. Steinbach,et al.  The channel opening rate of adult‐ and fetal‐type mouse muscle nicotinic receptors activated by acetylcholine , 1998, Journal of Physiology.

[21]  A. Hawkes,et al.  On the stochastic properties of single ion channels , 1981, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[22]  Steven M. Sine,et al.  Initial Coupling of Binding to Gating Mediated by Conserved Residues in the Muscle Nicotinic Receptor , 2005, The Journal of general physiology.

[23]  K. Ohno,et al.  Mutation in the M1 Domain of the Acetylcholine Receptor α Subunit Decreases the Rate of Agonist Dissociation , 1997, The Journal of general physiology.

[24]  P. Taylor,et al.  Structures of Aplysia AChBP complexes with nicotinic agonists and antagonists reveal distinctive binding interfaces and conformations , 2005, The EMBO journal.

[25]  Nicotinic Receptor Interloop Proline Anchors β1-β2 and Cys loops in Coupling Agonist Binding to Channel Gating , 2008, The Journal of general physiology.

[26]  T. Sixma,et al.  Nicotine and Carbamylcholine Binding to Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors as Studied in AChBP Crystal Structures , 2004, Neuron.

[27]  Y. Liu,et al.  Opening rate of acetylcholine receptor channels. , 1991, Biophysical journal.

[28]  R. Gunn,et al.  Functional differences among nonerythroid anion exchangers expressed in a transfected human cell line. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[29]  F J Sigworth,et al.  Activation of Torpedo acetylcholine receptors expressed in mouse fibroblasts. Single channel current kinetics reveal distinct agonist binding affinities , 1990, The Journal of general physiology.