Automatic Registration of Serial Cerebral Angiography: A Comparative Review

Image registration can play a major role in medical imaging as it can be used to identify changes that have occurred over a period of time, thus mirroring treatment effectiveness, recovery, and detection of diseases onset. While medical image registration algorithms have been largely evaluated on MRI and CT, less attention has been given to Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA). DSA of the brain is the method of choice for the diagnosis of numerous neurovascular conditions and is used during neurovascular surgeries. Numerous studies have relied on semi-automated registration that involve manual selection of matching features to compute the mapping between images. Nevertheless, there are currently a variety of automatic registration methods which have been developed, although the performance of these methods on DSA have not been fully explored. In this paper, we identify and review a variety of automatic registration methods, and evaluate algorithm performance in the context of serial image registration. We find that intensity-based methods are consistent in performance, while feature-based methods can perform better, but are also more variable in success. Ultimately a combined algorithm may be optimal for automatic registration, which can be applied to analyze vasculature information and improve unbiased treatment evaluation in clinical trials.

[1]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  MLESAC: A New Robust Estimator with Application to Estimating Image Geometry , 2000, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[2]  Lisa M. Brown,et al.  A survey of image registration techniques , 1992, CSUR.

[3]  Fabien Scalzo,et al.  Perfusion Angiography in Acute Ischemic Stroke , 2016, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[4]  A. Ardeshir Goshtasby,et al.  2-D and 3-D Image Registration: for Medical, Remote Sensing, and Industrial Applications , 2005 .

[5]  Julie Delon,et al.  SAR-SIFT: A SIFT-Like Algorithm for SAR Images , 2015, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[6]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  Computer Vision - Algorithms and Applications , 2011, Texts in Computer Science.

[7]  Maoguo Gong,et al.  Remote Sensing Image Registration With Modified SIFT and Enhanced Feature Matching , 2017, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[8]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[9]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  A survey of medical image registration , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[10]  J. Krupiński,et al.  Angiogenesis, Neurogenesis and Neuroplasticity in Ischemic Stroke , 2010, Current cardiology reviews.

[11]  Jean-Philippe Thirion,et al.  Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[12]  Martin Styner,et al.  Parametric estimate of intensity inhomogeneities applied to MRI , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  David R. Haynor,et al.  Nonrigid multimodality image registration , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[14]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  An Iterative Image Registration Technique with an Application to Stereo Vision , 1981, IJCAI.

[15]  B. N. Chatterji,et al.  An FFT-based technique for translation, rotation, and scale-invariant image registration , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[16]  Simon Baker,et al.  Lucas-Kanade 20 Years On: A Unifying Framework , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[17]  Tomás Pajdla,et al.  The geometric error for homographies , 2003, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[18]  Marc Niethammer,et al.  Multi-modal registration for correlative microscopy using image analogies , 2014, Medical Image Anal..

[19]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[20]  Cornelis H. Slump,et al.  MRI modalitiy transformation in demon registration , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[21]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[22]  Marc Levoy,et al.  Efficient variants of the ICP algorithm , 2001, Proceedings Third International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling.

[23]  Georgios D. Evangelidis,et al.  Parametric Image Alignment Using Enhanced Correlation Coefficient Maximization , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[24]  Michael Unser,et al.  Optimization of mutual information for multiresolution image registration , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[25]  William R. Brody,et al.  Digital Subtraction Angiography , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[26]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Understanding the "Demon's Algorithm": 3D Non-rigid Registration by Gradient Descent , 1999, MICCAI.

[27]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF) , 2008, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..