Which family physician should I choose? The analytic hierarchy process approach for ranking of criteria in the selection of a family physician

BackgroundChoosing the most appropriate family physician (FP) for the individual, plays a fundamental role in primary care. The aim of this study is to determine the selection criteria for the patients in choosing their family doctors and priority ranking of these criteria by using the multi-criteria decision-making method of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) model.MethodsThe study was planned and conducted in two phases. In the first phase, factors affecting the patients’ decisions were revealed with a qualitative research. In the next phase, the priorities of FP selection criteria were determined by using AHP model. Criteria were compared in pairs. 96 patient were asked to fill the information forms which contains comparison scores in the Family Health Centres.ResultsAccording to the analysis of focus group discussions FP selection criteria were congregated in to five groups: Individual Characteristics, Patient-Doctor relationship, Professional characteristics, the Setting, and Ethical Characteristics.For each of the 96 participants, comparison matrixes were formed based on the scores of their information forms. Of these, models of only 5 (5.2 %) of the participants were consistent, in other words, they have been able to score consistent ranking. The consistency ratios (CR) were found to be smaller than 0.10. Therefore the comparison matrix of this new model, which was formed based on the medians of scores only given by these 5 participants, was consistent (CR = 0.06 < 0.10).According to comparison results; with a 0.467 value-weight, the most important criterion for choosing a family physician is his/her ‘Professional characteristics’.ConclusionsSelection criteria for choosing a FP were put in a priority order by using AHP model. These criteria can be used as measures for selecting alternative FPs in further researches.

[1]  Catherine Hudon,et al.  Family physician enabling attitudes: a qualitative study of patient perceptions , 2013, BMC Family Practice.

[2]  Mike Pringle,et al.  Primary care : core values , 1998 .

[3]  N. Bickell,et al.  The relationship between continuity and patient satisfaction: a systematic review. , 2010, Family practice.

[4]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[5]  I R McWhinney,et al.  Primary care: core values Core values in a changing world , 1998, BMJ.

[6]  Bruce Guthrie,et al.  Bmc Family Practice Personal Continuity and Access in Uk General Practice: a Qualitative Study of General Practitioners' and Patients' Perceptions of When and How They Matter , 2022 .

[7]  Angela Bate,et al.  Preferences for access to the GP: a discrete choice experiment. , 2006, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[8]  Vildan Mevsim,et al.  Aile hekimliği çekirdek yeterlilikleri hastaların beklentileri ile uyuşmakta mıdır , 2012 .

[9]  David McDonald,et al.  Realworld Evaluation: Working under Budget, Time, Data, and Political Constraints , 2007 .

[10]  George K Freeman,et al.  Progress with relationship continuity 2012, a British perspective , 2012, International journal of integrated care.

[11]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2012 .

[12]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  DECISION MAKING WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS , 2008 .

[13]  Nicola Mead,et al.  Setting standards based on patients' views on access and continuity: secondary analysis of data from the general practice assessment survey , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  Tomoya Okubo,et al.  Population-level preferences for primary care physicians' characteristics in Japan: a structural equation modeling. , 2010, Internal medicine.

[15]  Yildirim Bayazit,et al.  A novel computer based expert decision making model for prostate cancer disease management. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[16]  Glyn Lewis,et al.  The patient-doctor relationship: a synthesis of the qualitative literature on patients' perspectives. , 2009, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[17]  Glyn Elwyn,et al.  Involving patients in primary care consultations: assessing preferences using discrete choice experiments. , 2006, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[18]  Maarten Joost IJzerman,et al.  A Comparison of Analytic Hierarchy Process and Conjoint Analysis Methods in Assessing Treatment Alternatives for Stroke Rehabilitation , 2012, The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.

[19]  F Asghari,et al.  What Do Patients Expect from Their Physicians? , 2010, Iranian journal of public health.

[20]  M. Bohanec,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2004 .

[21]  P. Bower,et al.  What Patients Want From Primary Care Consultations: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Identify Patients’ Priorities , 2008, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[22]  J G Dolan,et al.  Using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to develop and disseminate guidelines. , 1992, QRB. Quality review bulletin.

[23]  S. Woolf,et al.  Patient Reports of Preventable Problems and Harms in Primary Health Care , 2004, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[24]  P. Sloane,et al.  Patient perceptions of mistakes in ambulatory care. , 2010, Archives of internal medicine.

[25]  Kurt C Stange,et al.  Continuity of Primary Care: To Whom Does It Matter and When? , 2003, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[26]  Kimbroe J. Carter,et al.  Sequential Test Selection in the Analysis of Abdominal Pain , 1996, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[27]  Ami Schattner,et al.  Information and shared decision-making are top patients' priorities , 2006, BMC Health Services Research.