Relationship of Internet Health Information Use With Patient Behavior and Self-Efficacy: Experiences of Newly Diagnosed Cancer Patients Who Contact the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service

ABSTRACT This study examines the relationship of Internet health information use with patient behavior and self-efficacy among 498 newly diagnosed cancer patients. Subjects were classified by types of Internet use: direct use (used Internet health information themselves), indirect use (used information accessed by friends or family), and non-use (never accessing Internet information). Subjects were recruited from callers of the National Cancer Institute's (NCI's) Cancer Information Service, Atlantic Region. They were classified by type of Internet use at enrollment and interviewed by telephone after 8 weeks. There were significant relationships among Internet use and key study variables: subject characteristics, patient task behavior, and self-efficacy. Subjects' Internet use changed significantly from enrollment to 8 week follow-up; 19% of nonusers and indirect users moved to a higher level of Internet use. Significant relationships also were found among Internet use and perceived patient–provider relationship, question asking, and treatment compliance. Finally, Internet use was also significantly associated with self-efficacy variables (confidence in actively participating in treatment decisions, asking physicians questions, and sharing feelings of concern). The results of this study show that patients who are newly diagnosed with cancer perceive the Internet as a powerful tool, both for acquiring information and for enhancing confidence to make informed decisions.

[1]  Ahmad Risk,et al.  Review Of Internet Health Information Quality Initiatives , 2001, Journal of medical Internet research.

[2]  Alejandro R Jadad,et al.  Examination of instruments used to rate quality of health information on the internet: chronicle of a voyage with an unclear destination , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[4]  J. Reis,et al.  Computerized Training in Breast Self‐examination: A Test in a Community Health Center , 2004, Cancer nursing.

[5]  C. Eiser,et al.  Surviving cancer; what does it mean for you? An evaluation of a clinic based intervention for survivors of childhood cancer , 2000, Psycho-oncology.

[6]  T. Merluzzi,et al.  Self‐efficacy for coping with cancer: revision of the Cancer Behavior Inventory (version 2.0) , 2001, Psycho-oncology.

[7]  L. Aiken,et al.  A psychosocial model of sun protection and sunbathing in young women: the impact of health beliefs, attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy for sun protection. , 2000, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[8]  Suzanne M. Miller,et al.  Monitoring and blunting of threatening information: Cognitive interference and facilitation in the coping process. , 1996 .

[9]  Suzanne M. Miller,et al.  Monitoring versus blunting styles of coping with cancer influence the information patients want and need about their disease. Implications for cancer screening and management , 1995, Cancer.

[10]  N. Miller,et al.  Women's initiative for nonsmoking (WINS) II: the intervention. , 2000, Heart & lung : the journal of critical care.

[11]  石川 ひろの,et al.  医療コミュニケーション分析の方法 = The Roter method of interaction process analysis system (RIAS) , 2007 .

[12]  Christian Köhler,et al.  How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  M. Cabana,et al.  Physician asthma education program improves outcomes for children of low-income families. , 2004, Chest.

[14]  T. Hyslop,et al.  African-American men and intention to adhere to recommended follow-up for an abnormal prostate cancer early detection examination result. , 2000, Urology.

[15]  Lee Rainie,et al.  The online health care revolution: how the web helps americans take better care of themselves , 2000 .

[16]  D. Buller,et al.  Using language intensity to increase the success of a family intervention to protect children from ultraviolet radiation: predictions from language expectancy theory. , 2000, Preventive medicine.

[17]  H. de Vries,et al.  Short- and long-term effects of tailored information versus general information on determinants and intentions related to early detection of cancer. , 2004, Preventive medicine.

[18]  J. Powell,et al.  Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. , 2002, JAMA.

[19]  Steven Muncer,et al.  Reliability of Health Information on the Internet: An Examination of Experts' Ratings , 2002, Journal of medical Internet research.

[20]  A. Jette,et al.  Training physicians to conduct physical activity counseling. , 1997, Preventive medicine.

[21]  P. Butow,et al.  Promoting patient participation in the cancer consultation: evaluation of a prompt sheet and coaching in question-asking , 1999, British Journal of Cancer.

[22]  M. Winker,et al.  Guidelines for medical and health information sites on the internet: principles governing AMA web sites. American Medical Association. , 2000, JAMA.

[23]  H. de Vries,et al.  Motives for protective behavior against carcinogenic substances in the workplace: a pilot study among Dutch workers. , 2000, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[24]  Susannah Fox,et al.  Internet Health Resources , 2003 .

[25]  D. Tritchler,et al.  Cancer Patients: Their Desire for Information and Participation in Treatment Decisions , 1989, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[26]  Samantha A. Adams Assessment Strategies: How Patients Cope with the Diverse Quality Levels of Websites when Searching for Health Information , 2003, AMIA.

[27]  Peter Salovey,et al.  Matching Health Messages to Information-Processing Styles: Need for Cognition and Mammography Utilization , 2003, Health communication.

[28]  S. Kremers,et al.  Participation in a sigmoidoscopic colorectal cancer screening program: a pilot study. , 2000, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[29]  J E Ware,et al.  Methods For Measuring Patient Satisfaction With Specific Medical Encounters , 1988, Medical care.