External economic drivers and US agricultural production systems

Abstract US agriculture operates in a market driven economy, although government policies can have influence on what farmers produce and how they produce it. As with other businesses, agricultural producers respond to economic incentives and disincentives, and make decisions to maximize their welfare; usually measured as net income. We examined how external economic drivers shape the type of agricultural systems that producers adopt. Specifically, we considered the influence of technological advancements, income supports embodied in farm legislation, and changes in market structure and consumer demand. Changes in technology have often favored large-scale and specialized operations. Many of the technological advancements have required large-scale production units to justify the investment. Often the technology has been commodity specific. However, there is some evidence that more diversified production units might be able to achieve economies of both scale and scope. The influence of commodity support programs has been ambiguous. As farm legislation has evolved to decouple production decisions from program benefits, the incentives to specialize in program crops (crops that receive price and/or income benefits under federal legislation, such as corn, other grains and oil seeds) have diminished. However, wealth and risk effects, albeit small, may have promoted or inhibited the adoption of a more integrated system. The ability of producers to adopt more integrated systems has been primarily influenced by their natural resource base and proximity to markets. Changes in market structure, channels and consumer demand in the past five decades have been dramatic with consolidation and specialization in both production and marketing sectors. However, the diversity of consumer demand has also created opportunities for more integrated farm operations. There is an increasing number of consumers who have become concerned about how and where their food has been produced. Markets for organic, locally produced, free range and the like are expected to grow. While price and income supports may have been biased towards specialization (as these programs were targeted to specific commodities), the reduction in risk associated with the programs has enabled producers to expand the number and diversity of their production enterprises. Furthermore, through the use of strategic alliances, cooperation among producers on a regional basis may eventually lead to greater integration and diversification than could be achieved for the individual farm operation.

[1]  R. Pope,et al.  Diversification in relation to farm size and other socioeconomic characteristics. , 1980 .

[2]  M. Roberts,et al.  Government Payments and Farm Business Survival , 2006 .

[3]  Carolyn Dimitri,et al.  The 20th Century Transformation of U.S. Agriculture and Farm Policy , 2005 .

[4]  Julie Guthman,et al.  Agrarian Dreams: The Paradox of Organic Farming in California , 2004 .

[5]  A. Mishra,et al.  Are “Decoupled” Farm Program Payments Really Decoupled? An Empirical Evaluation , 2006 .

[6]  M. Roberts,et al.  Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization Losing Under Contract : Transaction-Cost Externalities and Spot Market Disintegration , 2011 .

[7]  L. B. Delind Transforming Organic Agriculture into Industrial Organic Products: Reconsidering National Organic Standards , 2000 .

[8]  Penni Korb,et al.  Agricultural Contracting Update: Contracts in 2003 , 2006 .

[9]  Peter Marcuse,et al.  Sustainability is not enough , 1998 .

[10]  J. Macdonald Agricultural Contracting, Competition, and Antitrust , 2006 .

[11]  A. K. Hoshide,et al.  B850: Representative Farm Budgets and Performance Indicators for Integrated Farming Practices in Maine , 2004 .

[12]  John R. Schroeter,et al.  Captive supplies and the spot market price of fed cattle: The plant-level relationship , 2003 .

[13]  R. Hoppe,et al.  Decoupled Payments in a Changing Policy Setting , 2004 .

[14]  Martin H. Entz,et al.  Reconsidering Integrated Crop-Livestock Systems in North America , 2007 .

[15]  Z. Griliches HYBRID CORN: AN EXPLORATION IN THE ECONOMIC OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE , 1957 .

[16]  R. Huirne,et al.  Coping with Risk in Agriculture , 1997 .

[17]  R. Nehring,et al.  Scale Economies and Efficiency in U.S. Agriculture: Are Traditional Farms History? , 2004 .

[18]  E. Heady Diversification in Resource Allocation and Minimization of Income Variability , 1952 .

[19]  J. Price,et al.  THE 2002 FARM ACT: PROVISIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR COMMODITY MARKETS , 2002 .

[20]  R. Goodhue,et al.  Reading the Fine Print in Agricultural Contracts: Conventional Contract Clauses, Risks and Returns , 2006 .

[21]  Effects of Government Program Payments on Farm Portfolio Diversification , 1996 .

[22]  R. Levins,et al.  Beyond profitability: Using economic indicators to measure farm sustainability , 2001 .

[23]  William W. Lin,et al.  Supply Response under Risk: Implications for Counter-Cyclical Payments' Production Impact , 2007 .

[24]  C. Ward,et al.  Marketing Agreement Impacts in an Experimental Market for Fed Cattle , 1999 .

[25]  Productivity, Economies, and Efficiency in U.S. Agriculture: A Look at Contracts , 2004 .

[26]  Brent Hueth,et al.  Identity Preservation, Multitasking, and Agricultural Contract Design , 2004 .

[27]  Michael J. Roberts,et al.  The Incidence of Government Program Payments on Agricultural Land Rents: The Challenges of Identification , 2003 .

[28]  Carmen Bain,et al.  Third-party certification in the global agrifood system , 2005 .

[29]  Ashok K. Mishra,et al.  Number 36 Off-Farm Income , Technology Adoption , and Farm Economic Performance , 2007 .

[30]  Keith O. Fuglie,et al.  Adoption of Agricultural Production Practices: Lessons Learned from the U.S. Department of Agriculture Area Studies Project , 2001 .

[31]  Janet Perry,et al.  Contracts, Markets, and Prices: Organizing the Production and Use of Agricultural Commodities , 2004 .

[32]  R. Sexton,et al.  Captive Supplies and the Cash Market Price: A Spatial Markets Approach , 2000 .

[33]  Joe Dewbre,et al.  The Impact of Coupled and Decoupled Government Subsidies on Off‐Farm Labor Participation of U.S. Farm Operators , 2006 .

[34]  C. Greene,et al.  Price premiums hold on as U.S. organic produced market expands , 2005 .

[35]  S. Goetz,et al.  Rural Population Decline in the 1980s: Impacts of Farm Structure and Federal Farm Programs , 1996 .

[36]  A. Power,et al.  Energetics and ecosystem integrity: The defining principles of sustainable agriculture , 1991 .

[37]  J. Hanson The wholesale produce auction: An alternative marketing strategy for small farms , 2002 .

[38]  D. Sumner Implications of the Us Farm Bill of 2002 for Agricultural Trade and Trade Negotiations , 2003 .