A high-order time-accurate interrogation method for time-resolved PIV

A novel method is introduced for increasing the accuracy and extending the dynamic range of time-resolved particle image velocimetry (PIV). The approach extends the concept of particle tracking velocimetry by multiple frames to the pattern tracking by cross-correlation analysis as employed in PIV. The working principle is based on tracking the patterned fluid element, within a chosen interrogation window, along its individual trajectory throughout an image sequence. In contrast to image-pair interrogation methods, the fluid trajectory correlation concept deals with variable velocity along curved trajectories and non-zero tangential acceleration during the observed time interval. As a result, the velocity magnitude and its direction are allowed to evolve in a nonlinear fashion along the fluid element trajectory. The continuum deformation (namely spatial derivatives of the velocity vector) is accounted for by adopting local image deformation. The principle offers important reductions of the measurement error based on three main points: by enlarging the temporal measurement interval, the relative error becomes reduced; secondly, the random and peak-locking errors are reduced by the use of least-squares polynomial fits to individual trajectories; finally, the introduction of high-order (nonlinear) fitting functions provides the basis for reducing the truncation error. Lastly, the instantaneous velocity is evaluated as the temporal derivative of the polynomial representation of the fluid parcel position in time. The principal features of this algorithm are compared with a single-pair iterative image deformation method. Synthetic image sequences are considered with steady flow (translation, shear and rotation) illustrating the increase of measurement precision. An experimental data set obtained by time-resolved PIV measurements of a circular jet is used to verify the robustness of the method on image sequences affected by camera noise and three-dimensional motions. In both cases, it is demonstrated that the measurement time interval can be significantly extended without compromising the correlation signal-to-noise ratio and with no increase of the truncation error. The increase of velocity dynamic range scales more than linearly with the number of frames included for the analysis, which supersedes by one order of magnitude the pair correlation by window deformation. The main factors influencing the performance of the method are discussed, namely the number of images composing the sequence and the polynomial order chosen to represent the motion throughout the trajectory.

[1]  Joseph Katz,et al.  Instantaneous pressure and material acceleration measurements using a four-exposure PIV system , 2006 .

[2]  R. Adrian Particle-Imaging Techniques for Experimental Fluid Mechanics , 1991 .

[3]  B. T. Hjertaker,et al.  Three-phase flow measurement in the petroleum industry , 2012 .

[4]  A. Fincham,et al.  Advanced optimization of correlation imaging velocimetry algorithms , 2000 .

[5]  Tommaso Astarita,et al.  Analysis of interpolation schemes for image deformation methods in PIV , 2005 .

[6]  Fulvio Scarano,et al.  Two techniques for PIV-based aeroacoustic prediction and their application to a rod-airfoil experiment , 2011 .

[7]  Cor J. Veenman,et al.  Resolving Motion Correspondence for Densely Moving Points , 2001, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[8]  N. Malik,et al.  Particle tracking velocimetry in three-dimensional flows , 1993 .

[9]  F. Scarano Iterative image deformation methods in PIV , 2002 .

[10]  Fulvio Scarano,et al.  Advances in iterative multigrid PIV image processing , 2000 .

[11]  Bernhard Wieneke,et al.  Multi-frame pyramid correlation for time-resolved PIV , 2012 .

[12]  Ferry Schrijer,et al.  Effect of predictor–corrector filtering on the stability and spatial resolution of iterative PIV interrogation , 2008 .

[13]  Carl D. Meinhart,et al.  Second-order accurate particle image velocimetry , 2001 .

[14]  S. Wereley,et al.  A PIV Algorithm for Estimating Time-Averaged Velocity Fields , 2000 .

[15]  Wei Yan,et al.  A multi-frame particle tracking algorithm robust against input noise , 2008 .

[16]  Tim Persoons,et al.  High Dynamic Velocity Range Particle Image Velocimetry Using Multiple Pulse Separation Imaging , 2011, Sensors.

[17]  Mubarak Shah,et al.  A noniterative greedy algorithm for multiframe point correspondence , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[18]  J. Westerweel,et al.  Particle Image Velocimetry for Complex and Turbulent Flows , 2013 .

[19]  J. Westerweel,et al.  Universal outlier detection for PIV data , 2005 .

[20]  Michel Stanislas,et al.  Main results of the third international PIV Challenge , 2008 .

[21]  Christian J. Kähler,et al.  Comparison of CCD, CMOS and intensified cameras , 2007 .

[22]  H. E. Fiedler,et al.  Limitation and improvement of PIV , 1993 .

[23]  Jürgen Kompenhans,et al.  Particle Image Velocimetry - A Practical Guide (2nd Edition) , 2007 .

[24]  J. Nogueira,et al.  Local field correction PIV: on the increase of accuracy of digital PIV systems , 1999 .

[25]  Steven T. Wereley,et al.  A correlation-based continuous window-shift technique to reduce the peak-locking effect in digital PIV image evaluation , 2002 .

[26]  Fulvio Scarano,et al.  Three-dimensional evolution of flow structures in transitional circular and chevron jets , 2011 .

[27]  Christian J. Kähler,et al.  Fundamentals of multiframe particle image velocimetry (PIV) , 2007 .

[28]  Ronald J. Adrian,et al.  Dynamic ranges of velocity and spatial resolution of particle image velocimetry , 1997 .

[29]  A. Prasad,et al.  Optimization procedure for pulse separation in cross-correlation PIV , 1996 .

[30]  Mathieu Legrand,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of PIV peak locking through a multiple Δt strategy: relevance of the rms component , 2011 .