Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Small World Connectivity on Firm Innovation

The structure of alliance networks strongly influences their potential for knowledge creation. Dense local clustering provides transmission capacity in the network by fostering communication and cooperation while non-redundant connections contract the distance between firms and give the network greater reach by tapping a wider range of knowledge resources. However, since firms are constrained in forming alliances, there appears to be a trade-off between creating transmission capacity versus reach. We argue that small world connectivity (i.e., simultaneity of high clustering and short average path lengths in a sparse, decentralized network) helps resolve this tradeoff by enabling transmission capacity and reach to be achieved simultaneously. We propose that firms embedded in alliance networks that exhibit high clustering and short average path lengths to a wide range of firms will experience greater knowledge creation than firms in networks that do not exhibit these characteristics. We find support for this proposition in a longitudinal study of the patent performance of 1106 firms in 11 industry-level alliance networks.

[1]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research , 1980 .

[2]  B. Kogut The network as knowledge : Generative rules and the emergence of structure , 2000 .

[3]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Measuring competence?: exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research , 1994 .

[4]  M. Kochen,et al.  Contacts and influence , 1978 .

[5]  G. Ahuja Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[6]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[7]  Robin Cowan,et al.  The dynamics of collective invention , 2003 .

[8]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Innovation and inter-firm linkages: new implications for policy , 1999 .

[9]  Rachelle C. Sampson,et al.  The Cost of Misaligned Governance in R&D Alliances , 2003 .

[10]  Mark Newman,et al.  Models of the Small World , 2000 .

[11]  R. Gulati Alliances and networks , 1998 .

[12]  Austen Albu Organisation of Industry , 2021, Nature.

[13]  Andrew B. Hargadon Firms as Knowledge Brokers: Lessons in Pursuing Continuous Innovation , 1998 .

[14]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[15]  James E. Rauch,et al.  Bandwidth and Echo: Trust, Information, and Gossip in Social Networks , 2001 .

[16]  A. Wilhite,et al.  Bilateral Trade and ‘Small-World’ Networks , 2001 .

[17]  W. Powell,et al.  Networks and Economic life , 2003 .

[18]  Z. Griliches The Search for R&D Spillovers , 1991 .

[19]  B. Kogut,et al.  INTERFIRM COOPERATION AND STARTUP INNOVATION IN THE BIOTECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY. , 1993 .

[20]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[21]  J. Hagedoorn Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960 , 2002 .

[22]  Thomas W. Valente Network models of the diffusion of innovations , 1996, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[23]  Thomas Cummings Innovation through alliances: Archimedes' hall of mirrors , 1991 .

[24]  David C Grabowski,et al.  Graduated driver licensing and teen traffic fatalities. , 2005, Journal of health economics.

[25]  Rachelle C. Sampson Experience effects and collaborative returns in R&D alliances , 2005 .

[26]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  NETWORK DATA AND MEASUREMENT , 1990 .

[27]  A. Cameron,et al.  Econometric models based on count data. Comparisons and applications of some estimators and tests , 1986 .

[28]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[29]  Nicholas S. Vonortas Research joint ventures in the US , 1997 .

[30]  J. T. Wulu,et al.  Regression analysis of count data , 2002 .

[31]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  A History of Mechanical Inventions , 1961, Nature.

[32]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[33]  C. Freeman Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues , 1991 .

[34]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[35]  Raimar Richers The theory of economic development , 1961 .

[36]  Joao Antonio Pereira,et al.  Linked: The new science of networks , 2002 .

[37]  John Guare,et al.  Six Degrees of Separation: A Play , 1990 .

[38]  Varghese P. George,et al.  From the Bottom Up? Technical Committee Activity and Alliance Formation , 2001 .

[39]  P. Allison,et al.  7. Fixed-Effects Negative Binomial Regression Models , 2002 .

[40]  Andrew Hargadon,et al.  Special Issue: Knowledge, Knowing, and Organizations: Action and Possibility: Reconciling Dual Perspectives of Knowledge in Organizations , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[41]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Knowledge Networks: Explaining Effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit Companies , 2002 .

[42]  Stephen P. Borgatti Identifying sets of key players in a network , 2003, IEMC '03 Proceedings. Managing Technologically Driven Organizations: The Human Side of Innovation and Change (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37502).

[43]  Andrew B. Hargadon Brokering knowledge: Linking learning and innovation , 2002 .

[44]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[45]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship , 1984 .

[46]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Where Do Small Worlds Come From? , 2003 .

[47]  G. Dosi Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation , 1988 .

[48]  R. Blundell,et al.  Dynamic Count Data Models of Technological Innovation , 1994 .

[49]  B. Kogut,et al.  The Small World of Germany and the Durability of National Networks , 2001, American Sociological Review.

[50]  S. C. Gilfillan,et al.  The sociology of invention , 1935 .

[51]  K. Pavitt,et al.  The technological competencies of the world''s largest firms , 1997 .

[52]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[53]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation : The case of R&D , 1997 .

[54]  Toby E. Stuart Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates i , 2000 .

[55]  M. Feldman The New Economics Of Innovation, Spillovers And Agglomeration: Areview Of Empirical Studies , 1999 .

[56]  D. Hecker High-Technology Employment: A Broader View , 1999 .

[57]  Scott Stern,et al.  Climbing Atop the Shoulders of Giants: The Impact of Institutions on Cumulative Research , 2006 .

[58]  R. Katila,et al.  Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .

[59]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Scale, scope, and spillovers: the determinants of research productivity in drug discovery. , 1996, The Rand journal of economics.

[60]  A. Rapoport,et al.  Connectivity of random nets , 1951 .

[61]  S H Strogatz,et al.  Random graph models of social networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[62]  Leonard M. Freeman,et al.  A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness , 1977 .

[63]  Kazuo Yamaguchi,et al.  The flow of information through social networks: diagonal-free measures of inefficiency and the structural determinants of inefficiency , 1994 .

[64]  T. Khanna,et al.  Do Firms Learn to Create Value? The Case of Alliances , 2000 .

[65]  D. Watts Networks, Dynamics, and the Small‐World Phenomenon1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[66]  Alan M. Frieze,et al.  Random graphs , 2006, SODA '06.

[67]  W. Luker,et al.  Employment Shifts in High-Technology Industries, 1988-96 , 1997 .

[68]  A. Jaffe Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[69]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[70]  Bjørn L. Basberg,et al.  Patents and the measurement of technological change: A survey of the literature☆ , 1987 .

[71]  P. Pattison,et al.  Small and Other Worlds: Global Network Structures from Local Processes1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[72]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[73]  D. Farrington,et al.  ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND YOUTH GANG MEMBERSHIP: SELECTION AND SOCIALIZATION , 2004 .

[74]  R. Gulati,et al.  Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[75]  Jacob Schmookler,et al.  Invention and Economic Growth , 1967 .

[76]  M. Newman,et al.  Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[77]  Judith K. Larsen,et al.  Gaining Control of the Corporate Culture.@@@Silicon Valley Fever: Growth of High-Technology Culture. , 1987 .

[78]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Don't go it alone: alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology , 2000 .

[79]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth , 1979 .

[80]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test , 1995 .

[81]  D. Mowery,et al.  Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer , 1996 .

[82]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Characterizing the “technological position” of firms, with application to quantifying technological opportunity and research spillovers☆ , 1989 .

[83]  G. Hamel Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances , 1991 .

[84]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[85]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[86]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[87]  R. Katila,et al.  SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF SEARCH BEHAVIOR AND NEW PRODUCT INTRODUCTION , 2002 .

[88]  D. Watts The “New” Science of Networks , 2004 .

[89]  Dean M. Behrens,et al.  Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries , 2000 .

[90]  K. Arrow Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[91]  B. Wellman Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. , 1988 .

[92]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[93]  Sharon L. Milgram,et al.  The Small World Problem , 1967 .

[94]  P. Soh The role of networking alliances in information acquisition and its implications for new product performance , 2003 .

[95]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[96]  J. Heckman Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[97]  Kenneth W. Koput,et al.  Networks and Knowledge Production: Collaboration and Patenting in Biotechnology , 1999 .

[98]  J. Hagedoorn Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Nterorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences , 1993 .

[99]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[100]  J. Shaver,et al.  Does international research and development increase patent output? An analysis of Japanese pharmaceutical firms , 2005 .

[101]  D. Teece Competition, Cooperation, and Innovation Organizational Arrangements for Regimes of Rapid Technological Progress , 1992 .