Rethinking the Digital Divide: Impacts on Student-Tutor Relationships.

This article emerged from a series of debates and workshops on the impact of the Digital Divide on educational practice at the ‘Futures of Learning: New Learning Paradigms Conference’ in Paris. The conceptualisation of the Digital Divide into the ‘haves’ and the ‘have-nots’, with a perception of the economically developed world as ‘high tech’ and the developing and underdeveloped worlds as ‘low tech’, is no longer tenable. Building on the recognition based on mounting evidence that old perceptions of the Digital Divide are simplistic and that the Divide encompasses not one but many discontinuities, the nature of such a discontinuity between student and tutor becomes the focus of the argument presented here. Many have argued that increased use and availability of digital technologies in schools bring important benefits and opportunities for learning and teaching strategies but are staff and students able work together to ensure positive outcomes? If not, why might this be the case? In examining the implications of the student/teacher Digital Divide some questions concerning the future direction of education emerge.

[1]  P. Rabbitt,et al.  Space fortress as an IQ test? Predictions of learning and of practised performance in a complex interactive video-game , 1989 .

[2]  Jean Underwood,et al.  Academic offences and e-learning: individual propensities in cheating , 2003, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[3]  Peter J. Larkham,et al.  Plagiarism and its Treatment in Higher Education , 2002 .

[4]  James Paul Gee,et al.  What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy , 2007, CIE.

[5]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[6]  David W. Shaffer,et al.  Epistemic frames for epistemic games , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[7]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Reconceptualizing the Digital Divide , 2002, First Monday.

[8]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People's Online Skills , 2002, First Monday.

[9]  P. Howard,et al.  Days and Nights on the Internet , 2001 .

[10]  Jean Underwood,et al.  How technology shapes orthography: are conventional spellings on the way out (again)? , 2003 .

[11]  J. Underwood,et al.  Student attitudes towards socially acceptable and unacceptable group working practices. , 2003, British journal of psychology.

[12]  Chris J. Park,et al.  In Other (People's) Words: Plagiarism by university students--literature and lessons , 2003 .

[13]  Robin I. M. Dunbar Grooming, Gossip and the Evolution of Language , 1996 .

[14]  D. Cecez-Kecmanovic,et al.  Towards a communicative model of collaborative web-mediated learning , 2000 .

[15]  J. C. Herz,et al.  Joystick Nation: How Videogames Ate Our Quarters, Won Our Hearts, and Rewired Our Minds , 1997 .

[16]  Robert LaRose,et al.  Internet Self-Efficacy and the Psychology of the Digital Divide , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[17]  M. Cole,et al.  The psychology of literacy , 1983 .

[18]  H. Haste,et al.  Joined-Up Texting: The role of mobile phones in young people’s lives , 2005 .

[19]  Bruce W. Char,et al.  Academic dishonesty in a high-tech environment , 2003, SIGCSE.