Diagnosis Of Persistent Infection In Prosthetic Two-Stage Exchange: PCR analysis of Sonication fluid From Bone Cement Spacers

Introduction: When treating periprosthetic joint infections with a two-stage procedure, antibiotic-impregnated spacers are used in the interval between removal of prosthesis and reimplantation. According to our experience, cultures of sonicated spacers are most often negative. The objective of our study was to investigate whether PCR analysis would improve the detection of bacteria in the spacer sonication fluid. Methods: A prospective monocentric study was performed from September 2014 to January 2016. Inclusion criteria were two-stage procedure for prosthetic infection and agreement of the patient to participate in the study. Beside tissues samples and sonication, broad range bacterial PCRs, specific S. aureus PCRs and Unyvero-multiplex PCRs were performed on the sonicated spacer fluid. Results: 30 patients were identified (15 hip, 14 knee and 1 ankle replacements). At reimplantation, cultures of tissue samples and spacer sonication fluid were all negative. Broad range PCRs were all negative. Specific S. aureus PCRs were positive in 5 cases. We had two persistent infections and four cases of infection recurrence were observed, with bacteria different than for the initial infection in three cases. Conclusion: The three different types of PCRs did not detect any bacteria in spacer sonication fluid that was culture-negative. In our study, PCR did not improve the bacterial detection and did not help to predict whether the patient will present a persistent or recurrent infection. Prosthetic 2-stage exchange with short interval and antibiotic-impregnated spacer is an efficient treatment to eradicate infection as both culture- and molecular-based methods were unable to detect bacteria in spacer sonication fluid after reimplantation.

[1]  J. Esteban,et al.  Evaluation of a commercial multiplex PCR (Unyvero i60®) designed for the diagnosis of bone and joint infections using prosthetic-joint sonication. , 2017, Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica.

[2]  A. Augusciak-Duma,et al.  Comparison of cultures and 16S rRNA sequencing for identification of bacteria in two-stage revision arthroplasties: preliminary report , 2016, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[3]  A. Hoerauf,et al.  Unyvero i60 implant and tissue infection (ITI) multiplex PCR system in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection. , 2016, Journal of microbiological methods.

[4]  J. Hardes,et al.  Two-stage revision arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infections: What is the value of cultures and white cell count in synovial fluid and CRP in serum before second stage reimplantation? , 2016, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[5]  C. Nelson,et al.  Sonication of Antibiotic Spacers Predicts Failure during Two-stage Revision for Prosthetic Knee and Hip Infections , 2014, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  T. Randau,et al.  Evidence of MRSE on a gentamicin and vancomycin impregnated polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA) bone cement spacer after two-stage exchange arthroplasty due to periprosthetic joint infection of the knee , 2014, BMC Infectious Diseases.

[7]  O. Borens,et al.  Accurate and early diagnosis of orthopedic device‐related infection by microbial heat production and sonication , 2013, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[8]  M. Mariconda,et al.  Sonication of antibiotic-loaded cement spacers in a two-stage revision protocol for infected joint arthroplasty , 2013, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[9]  A. Trampuz,et al.  Multiplex PCR of sonication fluid accurately differentiates between prosthetic joint infection and aseptic failure. , 2012, The Journal of infection.

[10]  A. Alier,et al.  The relationship between microbiology results in the second of a two-stage exchange procedure using cement spacers and the outcome after revision total joint replacement for infection: the use of sonication to aid bacteriological analysis. , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  M. Jacofsky,et al.  What is the Role of Serological Testing Between Stages of Two-stage Reconstruction of the Infected Prosthetic Knee? , 2011, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  T. Bauer,et al.  Improved Detection of Biofilm-formative Bacteria by Vortexing and Sonication: A Pilot Study , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  J. Parvizi,et al.  Staged Revision for Knee Arthroplasty Infection: What Is the Role of Serologic Tests Before Reimplantation? , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  J. Greenleaf,et al.  Sonication of removed hip and knee prostheses for diagnosis of infection. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.