DRIVER DISTRACTION AND CRASHES: AN ASSESSMENT OF CRASH DATABASES AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

A distracted driver has delayed recognition of information necessary for safe driving because an event in the vehicle or outside of the vehicle has attracted the driver's attention. A distracted driver may be less able to respond appropriately to changing road and traffic conditions leading to an increased likelihood of crash. Development of technology to reduce distraction-related crashes is proceeding, including the development of a workload/distraction management system in the SAfety VEhicle(s) using adaptive Interface Technology (SAVE-IT) program. In order to determine the potential benefits of systems such as SAVE-IT, it is necessary to understand the crash scenarios in which driver distraction is a likely contributor. This report has two purposes. The first is to review and assess available crash databases to determine which variables are available, feasible, and appropriate for determining distraction-related crash scenarios. The second purpose is to investigate a variety of other distraction-related scenarios in crash databases and those that may not appear in crash records directly, but, nonetheless, are likely to be related to distraction-related crashes. The crash databases reviewed are: the National Automotive Sampling System General Estimates System; The National Automotive Sampling System Crashworthiness Data System; the Fatality Analysis Reporting System; the Highway Safety Information System; and regional geographic information system databases. The report examines five crash scenarios to determine the relative frequency of distraction-related crashes by crash scenario: single vehicle run off the road; rear-end; intersection/crossing path; lane-change/merge; and head-on. This review also covers a number of distracted-driving scenarios both outside and inside the vehicle including: exterior incidents; looking at scenery; passenger interactions; adjusting entertainment systems; listening to music; cellular phone use; use of route-guidance systems; eating/drinking; adjusting vehicle controls; objects moving in the vehicle; and smoking. Also presented is a framework for rank-ordering the relative contribution of these scenarios to distraction-related crash risk.

[1]  Michael J. Goodman,et al.  DRIVER DISTRACTION WITH WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND ROUTE GUIDANCE SYSTEMS , 2000 .

[2]  J. Andrey,et al.  The situational risks of young drivers: the influence of passengers, time of day and day of week on accident rates. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  Warren Brodsky,et al.  The effects of music tempo on simulated driving performance and vehicular control , 2001 .

[4]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  The feasibility of detecting phone-use related driver distraction , 2001 .

[5]  J C Fell,et al.  THE RELATIVE FREQUENCY OF UNSAFE DRIVING ACTS IN SERIOUS TRAFFIC CRASHES - SUMMARY TECHNICAL REPORT , 2001 .

[6]  H. Beh,et al.  Performance on driving-related tasks during music , 1999 .

[7]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Driven to Distraction: Dual-Task Studies of Simulated Driving and Conversing on a Cellular Telephone , 2001, Psychological science.

[8]  M. Turner,et al.  The effect of music amplitude on the reaction to unexpected visual events. , 1996, The Journal of general psychology.

[9]  Paul Green,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND HUMAN FACTORS TESTS OF CAR PHONES. FINAL REPORT , 1993 .

[10]  William W. Hunter,et al.  CELL PHONE USE WHILE DRIVING IN NORTH CAROLINA , 2001 .

[11]  Transportation Officials,et al.  A policy on geometric design of highways and streets, 1984 , 1984 .

[12]  R. Savage,et al.  The effects of cigarette smoking on the response to stress in a driving simulator , 1972, British journal of pharmacology.

[13]  Wassim G. Najm,et al.  EXAMINATION OF CRASH CONTRIBUTING FACTORS USING NATIONAL CRASH DATABASES , 2003 .

[14]  J C Fell,et al.  THE RELATIVE FREQUENCY OF UNSAFE DRIVING ACTS IN SERIOUS TRAFFIC CRASHES - SUMMARY TECHNICAL REPORT , 2000 .

[15]  A. Trosclair,et al.  Cigarette smoking among adults--United States, 2000. , 2002, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[16]  Matthew Witte,et al.  Effect of cellular telephone conversations and other potential interference on reaction time in a braking response. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  Allan F Williams,et al.  Teenage drivers: patterns of risk. , 2003, Journal of safety research.

[18]  David W. Eby,et al.  Risky Driving: Relationship Between Cellular Phone and Safety Belt Use , 2003 .

[19]  N. Sherwood,et al.  Effects of cigarette smoking on performance in a simulated driving task. , 1995, Neuropsychobiology.

[20]  D Royal,et al.  VOLUME I: FINDINGS -- NATIONAL SURVEY OF DISTRACTED AND DROWSY DRIVING ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIORS: 2002 , 2003 .

[21]  H Alm,et al.  The effects of a mobile telephone task on driver behaviour in a car following situation. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  Michael J. Goodman,et al.  NHTSA DRIVER DISTRACTION RESEARCH: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE , 2001 .

[23]  Linda Ng Boyle,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF TEST SCENARIOS FOR OFF-ROADWAY CRASH COUNTERMEASURES BASED ON CRASH STATISTICS , 2002 .

[24]  Wassim G. Najm,et al.  Definition of the Light Vehicle Off-Roadway Crash Problem for the Intelligent Vehicle Initiative , 2001 .

[25]  Sven Dahlstedt Perception of some seat belt reminder sounds , 2001 .

[26]  Michael J. Goodman,et al.  The role of driver inattention in crashes: new statistics from the 1995 crashworthiness data system , 1996 .

[27]  P A Hancock,et al.  The distraction effects of phone use during a crucial driving maneuver. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[28]  Håkan Alm,et al.  THE USE OF CAR PHONES AND CHANGES IN DRIVER BEHAVIOUR , 2001 .

[29]  David W. Eby,et al.  DRIVER RESPONSE TO THE TETRASTAR NAVIGATION ASSISTANCE SYSTEM , 1997 .

[30]  Mark Vollrath,et al.  How the presence of passengers influences the risk of a collision with another vehicle. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[31]  F B Simmons,et al.  High-Powered Automobile Stereos , 1993, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[32]  Ethington,et al.  Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices and Problems in Traffic Control Agreements , 1968 .

[33]  E D Sussman,et al.  Driver inattention and highway safety , 1985 .

[34]  E R Braver,et al.  Carrying passengers as a risk factor for crashes fatal to 16- and 17-year-old drivers. , 2000, JAMA.

[35]  Fridulv Sagberg,et al.  Accident risk of car drivers during mobile telephone use , 2001 .

[36]  J. Sloboda,et al.  Functions of Music in Everyday Life: An Exploratory Study Using the Experience Sampling Method , 2001 .

[37]  Barry H. Kantowitz EFFECTIVE UTILIZATION OF IN VEHICLE INFORMATION : INTEGRATING ATTRACTIONS AND DISTRACTIONS , 2000 .

[38]  A Stevens,et al.  In-vehicle distraction and fatal accidents in England and Wales. , 2001, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[39]  Paul Green INTERNATIONAL INCIDENTS: CRASHES INDUCED BY DRIVER INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND WHAT CAN BE DONE TO REDUCE THEM. , 2000 .

[40]  J C Stutts,et al.  The role of driver distraction in crashes: an analysis of 1995-1999 Crashworthiness Data System Data. , 2001, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.